In many cases I¡¯ve resorted to admitting the member and resending the questionnaire afterwards. It seems to have a better chance of reaching them that way. Our group is NuM so there¡¯s not much risk.
?
Call me pessimistic but I don¡¯t think there¡¯s an easy solution to this. Mark tried really hard for awhile and couldn¡¯t. At the very least, maybe this will push him towards quicker implementation of the planned web-based questionnaire. Already we are losing members to parallel FB groups because they make it so easy. An emailed questionnaire (that goes into a black hole half the time) requiring an email response is a huge disincentive.
On Feb 13, 2018, at 1:26 PM, Don <
dgrass1@...> wrote:
It¡¯s nice to know it¡¯s not just me having this problem. I took your advice and contacted Mark.
?
Thank you,
Don
?
[Excess quote trimmed by moderator]
