开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Today

 

开云体育



On 3/12/21 9:25 AM, WillyTex via groups.io wrote:
“There’s no beating around the bush: This was de facto eugenics, wiping out the disabled and the elderly."

They’re Trying to Impeach Andrew Cuomo for the Wrong Thing


Looks like a recall election is coming up for California voters. Even Democrats have signed the recall petition.? We need to have these governors run up on criminal charges so we can uncover the fact that the feds blackmailed them into following orders or their state wouldn't get their federal funds which can be in the billions.? Greatest crime in history.



Re: Lock Down Reports

 

开云体育



On 3/12/21 9:06 AM, Emily Mae via groups.io wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:01 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Hospitalizations from the flu season not covid.? Happens every year.
Your refusal to acknowledge the existence of Covid-19 and insistence in attributing massive numbers of hospitalizations and deaths to the flu is pure conspiracy theory.??

Sieg hile Reich Officer Emily.? Massive numbers?? Really? You are very delusional.


Re: What!?

 

开云体育



On 3/12/21 6:44 AM, awb via groups.io wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:00 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Biologically men are sympathetic dominant and women parasympathetic dominant.
And this relates to the conversation exactly how??

Very cogently, but like I said you apparently weren't very good in your science class.? Do you even know what those two terms relate too??


Re: Today

WillyTex
 

“There’s no beating around the bush: This was de facto eugenics, wiping out the disabled and the elderly."

They’re Trying to Impeach Andrew Cuomo for the Wrong Thing


Re: What!?

 

开云体育

Wow, our link dog had to dig way back to 2012 find an article that agreed with her POV.? When was the last time you were in a toy store, Ann?

On 3/12/21 6:43 AM, awb via groups.io wrote:

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:57 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Because they often are.
Again, a lazy-ass assumption.
From the NYT back in 2012:

More Dads Buy the Toys, So Barbie, and Stores, Get Makeovers

  • ?
  • ?
  • ?
  • +

Barbies are for girls and construction sets are for boys. Or are they?

For the first time in Barbie’s more than 50-year history, Mattel is introducing a Barbie construction set that underscores a huge shift in the marketplace. Fathers are doing more of the family shopping just as girls are being encouraged more than ever by hypervigilant parents to play with toys (as boys already do) that develop math and science skills early on.

It’s a combination that not only has Barbie building luxury mansions — they are pink, of course — but Lego promoting a line of pastel construction toys called Friends that is an early Christmas season hit. The Mega Bloks Barbie Build ’n Style line, available next week, has both girls — and their fathers — in mind.

“Once it’s in the home, dads would very much be able to join in this play that otherwise they might feel is not their territory,” said Dr. Maureen O’Brien, a psychologist who consulted on the new Barbie set.

Consumer surveys show that men are increasingly making the buying decisions for families, reflecting the growth in two-income households and those in which the women work and the men stay home. One-fifth of fathers with preschool-age children and working wives said they were the primary caretaker in 2010, according to?. And 37.6 percent of working wives??than their husbands in 2011, up from 30.7 percent 10 years earlier.



Re: What!?

 

开云体育



On 3/12/21 6:41 AM, awb via groups.io wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Genders are part of nature.? Are you anti-nature now?
This is not even a relevant question. This has nothing to do with what my point was. Sure, some of us have vaginas and others have penises. We tend to label that either male or female. If you want to call that "nature" then fine. Because you missed my point I'll make it once again: Arbitrarily designating certain playthings as either boy friendly or girl appropriate is learned behavior based on nothing inherent - not built into the DNA, so to speak. Obviously, you accept certain cultural "norms" without question. I do not.

It's not a "cultural norm", it's science.? Apparently you weren't very good in science class. ?


Re: Lock Down Reports

 

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:01 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Hospitalizations from the flu season not covid.? Happens every year.
Your refusal to acknowledge the existence of Covid-19 and insistence in attributing massive numbers of hospitalizations and deaths to the flu is pure conspiracy theory.??

In WA, here is the reality.? This is due, btw, to wearing masks.?

Zero lab-confirmed influenza deaths have been reported for the 2020-2021 season to date. ?
Zero influenza-like illness outbreaks in long term care facilities have been reported for the 2020-2021 season to date.

In CA, here is the reality:

The number of flu deaths reported statewide is down nearly 90%, with four flu deaths reported so far in the current flu season versus 39 flu deaths reported in the last flu season.

?
--
Em


Re: What!?

 

Wonderful article.? Loved all the portraits.??
--
Em


Re: The Big Chill

 

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:38 AM, Emily Mae wrote:
The Number Two reason is because the grid is privatized—inevitably underinvested in as the quest by private industry for more and more of the almighty dollar goes on and on—and was?is badly underinvested in and so underprepared.?
Got to do better on these looonnnnngggg sentences!??
?
--
Em


Re: The Big Chill

 

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 05:39 PM, WillyTex wrote:
“The race to add in renewables pushed out more reliable forms of energy and kept new reliable energy from being built. That resulted in the buffer in our electric grid being stripped out—going from more than a 20% surplus years ago to single digits in the last couple of years.”

Texas Energy Outage Postmortem

You do realize you're getting your information from a science fiction writer, don't you?? Get me an expert and we'll talk.??

The Number One reason people froze to death is because the Texas power grid is not connected to other grids that could have provided backup.? The Number Two reason is because the grid is privatized—inevitably underinvested in as the quest by private industry for more and more of the almighty dollar goes on and on—and was badly underinvested in and so underprepared.?
? ??

Benjamin Sovacool, professor of energy policy at the University of Sussex, reportedly told Newsweek that in Northern Europe, “wind power operates very reliably in even colder temperatures, including the upper Arctic regions of Finland, Norway, and Sweden.” ()

More can be read on adapting renewable energy forms to cold weather??,??, and??.

Crucially, the continued use and investment of renewable energy can help slow the effects of climate change, which leads to more extreme weather patterns.

A recent Reuters fact check of social media posts claiming to show “a helicopter, using fossil fuels, spraying de-icer, made with fossil fuels, to de-ice a wind turbine” in Texas is available??.??
--
Em


Re: That's Different Because

WillyTex
 

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:51 AM, WillyTex wrote:
Sometimes it's not so much the issues, but the hypocrisy that grates. YMMV.
“You have got to be kidding. Apple, seriously, putting out this statement and yet they allow Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and just take a look at the top hip hop songs on Apple Music. Disgusting. Apple is spitting in your face and telling you it’s raining.”

More Big Tech Hypocrisy: Apple Blackballs Parler… Again!


Re: What!?

 

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:46 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
Pink used to be associated with young BOYS... as I understand it was the British Army... the adult men were the Redcoats, the yong recruits wore pink jackets. ?Obviously there is nothing inherently feminine or masculine about any color. ?Or toy.
?
What gave pink it’s new life as a color for girls were Mamie Eisenhower and later Jackie Kennedy.
?
?I also find this discussion interesting seeing as how Bhairitu has no kids and the last time he had any contact with one was probably 1980.

Sal
?
Another interesting little factoid. The red jackets you see in the hunting field (fox hunting with horses) are actually called "pink" even though they are a deep red color.


Re: What!?

 

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:00 AM, Emily Mae wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 07:03 AM, awb wrote:
Can't agree with you more.? The whole thing is getting ridiculous.? I don't think just you would be annoyed at trying to find the toys for boys and the toys for girls but moms might not like that either.
Here is the thing. I am not sure what "toys for boys and the toys for girls" even means. What toys are strictly for any gender? It just doesn't compute for me. Are you saying that girl dolls are only played with by girls and men/action figure/military dolls are only played with by boys? Why would this be the case? I'll tell you why - because it is learned behavior. All of it is learned by innocent children when they are first handed their gender-friendly/specific toy. It is an insidious thing. In reality, there really is no boy or girl toy. It is the same for clothing. What precludes a boy from wearing a dress or skirt or flowery top? Conditioning by unimaginative parents, that's what. And don't get me started about pink for girls and blue for boys - what the hell is that?!
My daughter loved playing with trucks.? She didn't like pink.? My sister's boy liked pink.? He also loved playing with trucks.? Who doesn't like playing with trucks!?! When he grew up a little and went to school, he quit wearing pink.? A "girl" color.? Unless, of course, it's pearl pink.??
? ?
?
--Pearl Metallic 1979 Corvette Might Be Too 'Custom' To Love
Exactly. I didn't even realize the pink/blue thing was a thing until about 10 years ago. I was flabbergasted. Such BS. So much is unconsciously dictated to us about all sorts of things. In my sport (riding) the girls are tough, often don't have children, are often single and have day jobs like driving heavy trucks and shoeing horses. Pink just isn't in the computation. My grand nephew is being raised wearing whatever he wants including dresses and pink flowery prints. It will be interesting to see what his adult wardrobe is going to include. I can't wait.

Here’s Why it All Changed: Pink Used to be a Boy’s Color & Blue For Girls

?
?
?

Recent years have seen some big changes in terms of our perception of gender, with the age-old concepts of gender identities and “norms” being challenged and question by people all over the world.

New terms like “gender-neutral” and “non-binary” have entered the lexicon, but there’s still a lot of progress to be made in this area and there are still a lot of seemingly gender-specific concepts, and even colors.

For years, we’ve all lived and operated in a world where pink is traditionally seen as a feminine color, while blue is reserved for boys. We see this rigid dichotomy everywhere, from greetings cards to children’s clothes.

?

Five week old twins newborn wearing pink and blue – boy or girl?

When a new baby is born, parents are typically given countless blue or pink gifts in relation to the child’s gender, but, as strange as it may seem to us nowadays, there was a time when blue was the “feminine” color, and pink was more popular with males.

To understand this concept, we have to go back to a time before colors were associated with gender at all. As revealed by Jo B. Paoletti, a professor at the University of Maryland and author of?Pink and Blue: Telling the Boys from the Girls in America, there was once a time well before pink and blue were used to distinguish between boys and girls at all.

Portrait of a young girl in pink dress by Raimundo de Madrazo y Garreta, 1890s

Portrait of a young girl in pink dress by Raimundo de Madrazo y Garreta, 1890s

?

Back in those days, society was actually a lot more progressive than it eventually became, with gender-neutral clothing being the norm. All children, whether male or female, were typically dressed in white.

https://youtu.be/MssjjdVAj6k

Both boys and girls would wear dresses at this time, and the color white was chosen due to the fact that it was very easy to clean using bleach. Children wouldn’t really start wearing more colorful attire and gender-specific items like shirts and skirts until they reached the age of six or seven.

Young boy in pink, American school of painting, c. 1840

Young boy in pink, American school of painting, c. 1840

As reported by The List and revealed by Paoletti in her book, the concept of associating individual colors with genders didn’t really start to happen until the mid-19th century.

At this point, light tones and pastel colors started to be more commonly seen on children and associated with little ones. Decades later, the individual colors of pink and blue started to be linked with one gender or the other, but not in the way we might expect. In fact, blue was usually worn by girls and pink was the preferred shade for boys.

The Blue Boy by Thomas Gainsborough, 1779

The Blue Boy by Thomas Gainsborough, 1779

?

A specific example of this can be seen in an old trade publication from 1918. According to Smithsonian, the magazine Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department noted “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls”.

Theories to explain this have varied over the years, but it’s generally believed that blue was associated with the Virgin Mary, hence its more feminine connotations, while pink was linked to red, which was seen as a strong and masculine color.

In the 1280s, Duccio painted the Christ child dressed in pink

In the 1280s, Duccio painted the Christ child dressed in pink

These ideas were reinforced by writer and color expert Gavin Evans during an interview with Business Insider.

Evans revealed that back in the late 19th century and early 20th century, it was common for mothers to be told that boys should be dressed in a masculine color like pink in order to grow into a more manly individual later in life, while girls should be dressed in a more feminine alternative like blue.

Paul-Henri Thiry, Baron d’Holbach by Louis Carmontelle. Pink was considered a strong and ‘manly’ color.

?

Strangely enough, in the wake of World War II, the script was flipped and pink suddenly started being marketed and sold by fashion brands and retailers as the perfect color for women, while blue was suddenly manly and masculine.

Over time, the gap between these colors only increased and the pink/blue divide started to spread to toys, accessories, cribs, strollers, and more.

Marilyn Monroe as Lorelei Lee, singing ‘Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend’

Nowadays, with greater understanding and awareness of gender identities and more work being done to break down old stereotypes of gender-specific associations, the time of the pink/blue divide might be approaching its end.

Fashions and trends can change in an instant, and the fascinating but strange story of pink and blue is clearly a perfect example of just how quickly these ideas can come and go.


Re: What!?

 

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:00 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Biologically men are sympathetic dominant and women parasympathetic dominant.
And this relates to the conversation exactly how??


Re: What!?

 

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:57 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Because they often are.
Again, a lazy-ass assumption.
From the NYT back in 2012:

More Dads Buy the Toys, So Barbie, and Stores, Get Makeovers

  • ?
  • ?
  • ?
  • +

Barbies are for girls and construction sets are for boys. Or are they?

For the first time in Barbie’s more than 50-year history, Mattel is introducing a Barbie construction set that underscores a huge shift in the marketplace. Fathers are doing more of the family shopping just as girls are being encouraged more than ever by hypervigilant parents to play with toys (as boys already do) that develop math and science skills early on.

It’s a combination that not only has Barbie building luxury mansions — they are pink, of course — but Lego promoting a line of pastel construction toys called Friends that is an early Christmas season hit. The Mega Bloks Barbie Build ’n Style line, available next week, has both girls — and their fathers — in mind.

“Once it’s in the home, dads would very much be able to join in this play that otherwise they might feel is not their territory,” said Dr. Maureen O’Brien, a psychologist who consulted on the new Barbie set.

Consumer surveys show that men are increasingly making the buying decisions for families, reflecting the growth in two-income households and those in which the women work and the men stay home. One-fifth of fathers with preschool-age children and working wives said they were the primary caretaker in 2010, according to?. And 37.6 percent of working wives??than their husbands in 2011, up from 30.7 percent 10 years earlier.


Re: What!?

 

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Genders are part of nature.? Are you anti-nature now?
This is not even a relevant question. This has nothing to do with what my point was. Sure, some of us have vaginas and others have penises. We tend to label that either male or female. If you want to call that "nature" then fine. Because you missed my point I'll make it once again: Arbitrarily designating certain playthings as either boy friendly or girl appropriate is learned behavior based on nothing inherent - not built into the DNA, so to speak. Obviously, you accept certain cultural "norms" without question. I do not.


Re: The Big Chill

WillyTex
 

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 01:14 PM, WillyTex wrote:
Out of the 45 gigawatts that went dark, 18 gigawatts were from wind and solar.
“The race to add in renewables pushed out more reliable forms of energy and kept new reliable energy from being built. That resulted in the buffer in our electric grid being stripped out—going from more than a 20% surplus years ago to single digits in the last couple of years.”

Texas Energy Outage Postmortem


Re: Sports News

WillyTex
 

"Cowboys owner Jerry Jones wants 100% capacity at AT&T Stadium in Arlington for 2021 season."


Sports News

WillyTex
 

Play Ball!

"The Texas Rangers on Wednesday announced that they will allow 100% capacity at Globe Life Field for their home opener in Arlington."

Texas Rangers Become First to Allow 100% Capacity in the Stands for Opening Day.


Re: What!?

 

On 3/11/21 12:46 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
Pink used to be associated with young BOYS... as I understand it was the British Army... the adult men were the Redcoats, the yong recruits wore pink jackets. ?Obviously there is nothing inherently feminine or masculine about any color. ?Or toy.

What gave pink it’s new life as a color for girls were Mamie Eisenhower and later Jackie Kennedy.

?I also find this discussion interesting seeing as how Bhairitu has no kids and the last time he had any contact with one was probably 1980.
You couldn't be more wrong.? No I don't have any kids but I do have grand nephews and nieces, the youngest of which was born in 2000. For Christmas of that year I gave her a toy piano.? Even at 6 months of age she was fascinated with it and yes she turned out to be an accomplished musicians performing in groups in her teens.? She is also an accomplished artist and art major in college.

I also taught music lesson during the 1980s so had to deal with young students daily.? The trick was to get them to enjoy their lessons rather than some damn thing their parents wanted.? I had some drum student who had no idea of the advanced performance level they were at until they went to college. ;-)