Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Re: Request to send letter to property owner of site #3
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýJim, Honestly, I don¡¯t understand all these delays, but if you can answer the following questions, perhaps it will explain the delays. (1) Why are you optimistic that the school district will allow installation of the mailboxes on their property? If their situation is like Vista Del Oro, what was the 40¡¯ easement along the west side of their property was deeded or sold to the Road District. Most likely, there no longer is an easement for us to install the boxes on. But even if there is an easement, we still need their permission. (2) If the school district will not allow installation on their property or easement, where would you propose the mailboxes be installed? (3) You seem to have some serious reservations about site #3 west. What are they? (4) You say, ¡°I believe we can get what we want without him [Nathan Williams]¡±. What do we want and how are we going to get it without an attorney being involved? Some kind of legal agreement must be drawn up and recorded in the Recorder Office. Your objection to Nathan sending a letter of intent to the property owner of site #3 appears to be financial. That¡¯s not a problem. I will be happy to pay all his charges for sending the letter. I promise you, at this point, nothing would make my happier! I am eager to pay! If Nathan sends the letter in the next few days, the school district turns us down, and the surveyors come out, then perhaps we could have the mailboxes installed in about 45 days, say about May 1. I will be happy to personally interact with the surveyors. We need very little information from them. I don¡¯t understand your comment about the mailboxes. "16" refers to the number of tenant doors, not ft. The mailboxes I discussed are the standard ones exactly like they have at Vista Del Oro, Covey Run, and the main part of Wild Horse. KenOn 3/22/2021 10:44 AM, Jim Ruby wrote:
|