Karen, As I said, I suspect it is
because your end of the road was not planned to be a road by the
developer, and it's not shown as a road on the county parcel map.
But I really don't know.? The FERMID governance document should
shed some light on the question so it's another reason to get a
copy of that document. ?
Ken
On 3/11/2021 8:32 AM, Karen McKnight
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
This is an excellent question. I was perplexed why
my end of the road was not paved.? If someone could shed some
light on this it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Karen
Karen¡¯s statement, ¡°The Fairfield
?Road organization did not extend the paved road to my
area¡¡± brings up a question I¡¯ve thought about. What
are the roads that the Fairfield Estates Road
Maintenance and Improvement District (FERMID) are
responsible for? I assume they are defined in the
governance document, and I suspect that they are the
roads the original developer planned and those are
shown on the county parcel map (attached). Karen¡¯s
driveway is on the easement of the Odean and Sandoval
property shown on the map in Philip¡¯s email.
You may have noticed something odd
about the way I outlined Fairfield Estates (FE) on the
attached map. Karen¡¯s property is 8081 FC and the
parcel immediately to the north looks like it should
be in FE. I left it out because it has an address on
Circle S Drive. Philip¡¯s photo shows it is separated
from Karen¡¯s property and the rest of FE by a dry
wash, and they don¡¯t use our roads. I checked their
tax document, and it turns out the property is in FE,
however it¡¯s not taxed by FERMID, which is fair.
Ken
Just saw Karen last email. Thank
you, Karen.
On 3/11/2021 8:06 AM, Karen McKnight wrote:
Thank you for the layout and explanation
.? I then have no issues with option #3.
On Thu, Mar 11,
2021 at 8:15 AM Philip Apodaca <
PSAAPO@...>
wrote:
I
concur with Mr. Paddock and want to also point out
it would be on the paved portion and there is
another property between you and the proposed
site.?
