This is an excellent question. I was perplexed why my end of the road was not paved.? If someone could shed some light on this it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Karen
Karen¡¯s statement, ¡°The Fairfield ?Road
organization
did not extend the paved road to my area¡¡± brings up a question
I¡¯ve thought
about. What are the roads that the Fairfield Estates Road
Maintenance and Improvement
District (FERMID) are responsible for? I assume they are defined
in the governance
document, and I suspect that they are the roads the original
developer planned
and those are shown on the county parcel map (attached). Karen¡¯s
driveway is on
the easement of the Odean and Sandoval property shown on the map
in Philip¡¯s
email.
You may have noticed something odd about the
way I outlined
Fairfield Estates (FE) on the attached map. Karen¡¯s property is
8081 FC and the
parcel immediately to the north looks like it should be in FE. I
left it out
because it has an address on Circle S Drive. Philip¡¯s photo
shows it is separated
from Karen¡¯s property and the rest of FE by a dry wash, and they
don¡¯t use our
roads. I checked their tax document, and it turns out the
property is in FE,
however it¡¯s not taxed by FERMID, which is fair.
Ken
Just saw Karen last email. Thank you, Karen.
On 3/11/2021 8:06 AM, Karen McKnight
wrote:
Thank you for the layout and explanation .? I then
have no issues with option #3.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:15
AM Philip Apodaca <
PSAAPO@...> wrote:
I
concur with Mr. Paddock and want to also point out it would
be on the paved portion and there is another property
between you and the proposed site.?
