²Ñ²¹¡¯²¹³¾,
I ?guess I don¡¯t understand why traffic would increase down the dirt road to your house. It¡¯s approximately a 1/4 mile from where the proposed mail boxes would go to your house. And the site is before the turn onto Paseo Venado. Additionally there is space on the opposite side of the road from the mail box to turn around. I would imagine the only ones drive down towards your house are lost as it is a dead end. Given all the options I do not really see how any others are better and more neutral than site #3.?
Matthew Paddock
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mar 10, 2021, at 22:00, Karen McKnight <imecorp@...> wrote:
?
I meant significantly not signification auto correct (bummer)?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:58 PM Karen McKnight via <imecorp=
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Neighbors:
I understand the legal aspect of it, however my concern is that a flow of traffic at site#3 would bring significant traffic to my property.? My area of Fairfield road suffers signification since The Fairfield ?Road organization did not extend the paved road to my area ; which suffers when in Monsoon.?
?I can see my area of Fairfield road, becoming a turnaround spot if the mailboxes are put ?at site 3. I already get trespassers whom take the liberties of using my property as a throughway.?
?I suggest we look at a neutral location that affects no-ones property. ? With this being said I'm not saying no ?but not saying yes at this time.?
Any feedback would be welcomed.
Thanks,
Karen
Thank you Karen for your question.
I assume that you are referring to near
the intersection of Fairfield and 3 Canyons.? That is potential
site #1 referred to in previous emails. The Road District
attorney, Nathan Williams, looked at the easement documents for
both that site and #3 and concluded that legally we have a much
better case for installing the mailboxes on the easement of site
#3 than #1.? This is because the easement for site #1 is just the
usual broad easement for "ingress/egress and utilities" and is not
a specific agreement between the Road District and the property
owner, the Palominas School District.? In contrast, the easement
agreement for site #3 is specifically between the Road District
and the previous landowner and gives the Road District much more
latitude as what we can do in the easement.
Personally I see other advantages to
site #3 over #1 such as it's much more spacious than what we would
have at site #1.?
Ken
On 3/10/2021 6:46 PM, Karen McKnight
wrote:
I was just wandering why the mailboxes couldn't be
placed at the beginning of the street by the entrance, where
there are no homes and traffic would be to a minimum ?
Hi
All,
I'm sure you're getting really tired of getting emails from
me, but I
would like to get as many responses as possible regarding
the proposed
location of the mailboxes. Of the 17 homeowners on the email
lists, so
far 12 have responded with a thumbs up and none with a
thumbs down.? If
you haven't responded, please do so by midnight tonight.
Thanks,
Ken
