¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Last call for responses


 

I meant significantly not signification auto correct (bummer)?

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:58 PM Karen McKnight via <imecorp=[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Neighbors:

I understand the legal aspect of it, however my concern is that a flow of traffic at site#3 would bring significant traffic to my property.? My area of Fairfield road suffers signification since The Fairfield ?Road organization did not extend the paved road to my area ; which suffers when in Monsoon.?

?I can see my area of Fairfield road, becoming a turnaround spot if the mailboxes are put ?at site 3. I already get trespassers whom take the liberties of using my property as a throughway.?

?I suggest we look at a neutral location that affects no-ones property. ? With this being said I'm not saying no ?but not saying yes at this time.?

Any feedback would be welcomed.

Thanks,
Karen

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:20 PM Ken Cameron via <rocks=[email protected]> wrote:
Thank you Karen for your question.

I assume that you are referring to near the intersection of Fairfield and 3 Canyons.? That is potential site #1 referred to in previous emails. The Road District attorney, Nathan Williams, looked at the easement documents for both that site and #3 and concluded that legally we have a much better case for installing the mailboxes on the easement of site #3 than #1.? This is because the easement for site #1 is just the usual broad easement for "ingress/egress and utilities" and is not a specific agreement between the Road District and the property owner, the Palominas School District.? In contrast, the easement agreement for site #3 is specifically between the Road District and the previous landowner and gives the Road District much more latitude as what we can do in the easement.

Personally I see other advantages to site #3 over #1 such as it's much more spacious than what we would have at site #1.?

Ken


On 3/10/2021 6:46 PM, Karen McKnight wrote:
I was just wandering why the mailboxes couldn't be placed at the beginning of the street by the entrance, where there are no homes and traffic would be to a minimum ?

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:34 PM Ken Cameron via <rocks=[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All,

I'm sure you're getting really tired of getting emails from me, but I
would like to get as many responses as possible regarding the proposed
location of the mailboxes. Of the 17 homeowners on the email lists, so
far 12 have responded with a thumbs up and none with a thumbs down.? If
you haven't responded, please do so by midnight tonight.

Thanks,

Ken








Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.