开云体育

Hi Charlie, I do not know if either man is still active, but if you send me your email address ( kevin@... ) I will send them your post and contact information at the email address they

Hi Jack, The haplogroup of the descendants of William Daniel of Middlesex County, VA is I-M253. This line has impeccable primary evidence to support identification of multiple descendants of William

Kevin and List Members, I descend from Martin Daniel Sr (ca. 1750-1811) of Mecklenburg Co., VA through his son Martin Daniel Jr (ca 1792-bef 1850).? Back in 2010, I was in contact with a? James

Hi Kevin Some years ago I was emailing a descendant of the Daniels of Tabley. He said they are R1b and not I2. I think the same may be true of the Middlesex VA Daniels. Jack

Hi Jack, I moved this discussion under the topic of "Roger Daniel of Warwick County, VA" so that future researchers can find it more easily. Kevin

It’s fine. I appreciate all the info in this discussion. It’s helped me realize how difficult all this is to sort out. I definitely intend to do some DNA testing to see where it goes. I just need

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:40 PM, <dgarner.tn@...> wrote: > > Hello, > I am new to the Daniel Surname DNA Project and to this group. I am trying > to trace my line. I can trace it back to one

This thread continues a discussion about Roger Daniel which was started in a thread by David Garner on 30 January 2020. I am attaching a hypothetical tree for descendants of Roger Daniel supplied in

"Warwick County, VA where Roger Daniel resided" I have Roger IV dying in Granville County in 1680. There were many Rogers: V, VI, VII, and yet another who was son of John son of Roger IV.

Thanks Jack. I am spinning this off into a new message thread so we can stop hijacking David's thread and it will be easier for future researchers to find this information.

"I am confused, is Woodson M. Daniel's ancestor claimed to be William Daniel of Middlesex, VA or Roger Daniel of Warick, VA?" Not Roger directly, but we don't know. There may be more than one Woodson

Y DNA cannot be used in this fashion. Y DNA cannot prove a connection to Roger Daniel if his Y DNA is not proved. What this group could prove at the time the chart was published was, as I recall,

I believe you are correct that no primary records exist, therefore we have only DNA to use so we must make the best of it. Primary records are no more trustworthy than DNA since NPEs of all types are

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:17 PM, Jack Danel wrote: https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/KPS3-866/woodson-m-daniel-1820-1870 The farther back the ancestry goes from Woodson Daniel in this

"I guess I should have clarified. I was born David Daniel. My last name was changed when I was adopted by my stepfather as a child. So that’s where Garner comes from. I am descended in an unbroken

"Find-a-grave Woodson is a descendant of Roger IV Daniel, the progenitor of a fairly well tested lineage that is identified by the A11115. If you think he is yours, I have more info." As far as I am

If you think your Woodson is the same as the find-a-grave Woodson, there is a cheap and easy way to check. You would get an SNP A11115 test from Yseq.org for about $20. If they are not the same, then

I guess I should have clarified. I was born David Daniel. My last name was changed when I was adopted by my stepfather as a child. So that’s where Garner comes from. I am descended in an unbroken

Y DNA is passed only from father to son, so unless your direct paternal line is an unbroken string of men with the surname Daniel back to Woodson M. Daniel, your Y DNA would not be the same as his Y