Re: DXKeeper 1.1.6 is available
Yes, of course I saw that too and Logger is a bit flaky on that
score because it doesn't have separate fields for name and QTH and
the exports the comment field with the <NAME> tag. I could see
what
By
Richard B Drake
·
#34
·
|
Re: DXKeeper 1.1.6 is available
The progress problem is a defect that was easily fixed; I'll send you a
progress report file so youc an verify that this was the only problem.
I noticed a lot of "truncated name" messages. With the
By
Dave, AA6YQ <dhb@...>
·
#33
·
|
Re: DXKeeper 1.1.6 is available
Dave,
The import went fine, except for the program error that occurs at
QSO #3757. I found that all I have to do to recover from that is
to close and reopen DXKeeper, then start the import again.
By
Richard B Drake
·
#32
·
|
Re: DXKeeper 1.1.6 is available
That's a pretty good clue, Rich -- it implies that the import operation is
not properly handling worked-but-not-confirmed QSOs. I've imported my 13K
QSOs (from the first-generation DXLab, which began
By
Dave, AA6YQ <dhb@...>
·
#31
·
|
Re: DXKeeper 1.1.6 is available
Dave,
I am still having a problem with the Progress Table not showing
correct results for imported log entries. I did a little more
research and found that the only entries that were appearing in
the
By
Richard B Drake
·
#30
·
|
DXKeeper 1.1.6 is available
DXKeeper 1.1.6 corrects a defect that prevents addition of the first
QSO to a log via the Capture Window. This release also includes
further improvements to the online help.
If you've already
By
Dave Bernstein <dhb@...>
·
#29
·
|
DXKeeper 1.1.5 is available
Along with the DXCC database support described below, this release
also includes updated online help, which is accessible via
http://www.qsl.net/dxkeeper/Help/index.htm .
If you've installed
By
Dave Bernstein <dhb@...>
·
#28
·
|
Re: Progress window
I should have a new version of DXKeeper ready tonite -- it doesn't
use DXView during imports, and thus should eliminate the performance
problem. Then we can determine whether there is an additional
By
Dave Bernstein <dhb@...>
·
#27
·
|
Re: Progress window
Yes, multiple databases are to be avoided. I started with the notion
of one DXCC database managed by DXView, with other applications
invoking DXView for callsign lookups, etc. But its unacceptable
By
Dave Bernstein <dhb@...>
·
#26
·
|
Re: Progress window
OK, a bunch of stuff here.
First I have succeeded in getting the import to work with DXView.
Here is what I did:
1) Closed all applications and closed my dial up connection.
2) Disabled Norton
By
Richard B Drake
·
#25
·
|
Re: Progress window
Wow, that is a bit complex but it sounds like you have a good
handle on it. The problem of keeping two copies of a database in
sync without requiring data to be entered in two places is always
a bit
By
Richard B Drake
·
#24
·
|
Re: Progress window
To ensure its ability to perform callsign lookups, DXKeeper will from
now on include a copy of the DXCC database previously only packaged
with DXView. During startup, DXKeeper will determine whether
By
Dave Bernstein <dhb@...>
·
#23
·
|
DXView 1.2.5 is available
The primary purpose of this release is to correct the defect in Hygain DCU
rotator support reported by Julio below. I learned from Ed at DataMatrix
(the developers of ProLog) that the "set bearing"
By
Dave, AA6YQ <dhb@...>
·
#22
·
|
Re: Progress window
I import more than 1000 qso's from logger with out problems
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Verzonden: woensdag 21 maart 2001 23:50
Aan: dxlab@...
Onderwerp: RE: [dxlab] Re: Progress
By
Ron Eberson <zx@...>
·
#21
·
|
Pathfinder Users: updated searches for the FR and LZ callbooks
Our man Kurt, OE1002419, noticed that both the FR and LZ callbook URLs had
changed, tracked down the new URLs, and sent them my way. So we have him to
thank for the updated Pathfinder searches now
By
Dave, AA6YQ <dhb@...>
·
#20
·
|
Re: Progress window
Sounds like there's a latent defect in the DDE connection between DXKeeper
and DXLab. I suggest you hold off until I release a version of of DXKeeper
that performs the country code lookup without
By
Dave, AA6YQ <dhb@...>
·
#19
·
|
Re: Progress window
I don't know, but I am having a great deal of difficulty with the
import. I took out all the DXCC entries in the ADIF file to force
a lookup in DXView. It starts off going OK, pretty slow but I
By
Richard B Drake
·
#18
·
|
Re: Progress window
Yes, if there's a country code present in the imported QSO, DXKeeper
respects it.
The procedure you suggest will result in each imported callsign being
checked by DXView to determine a country
By
Dave Bernstein <dhb@...>
·
#17
·
|
Re: Progress window
I'm not sure if DXView was open when I did the import. However, it
was open when I did the recompute. I just did that again to make
sure, it didn't help. However, I just noticed something else. When
I
By
Richard B Drake
·
#16
·
|
Re: Progress window
Without seeing your log, I can't know for sure, but my suspicion is
that many of your DXKeeper log entries are missing DXCC country
codess -- likely because DXView was not running when these entries
By
Dave Bernstein <dhb@...>
·
#15
·
|