开云体育

Thanks Dave, understood. 73, N0AN Hasan [email protected]> wrote:

+ AA6YQ comments below + You can't reliably determine whether "your spot" was received via the Source field of an Entry in the Spot Database Display, which is t he callsign of the station that most

+ AA6YQ comments belo-w + At minimum, 1. protocol compatibility 2. issues raised by users not understanding which "variant" they are running 3. questions from 3rd party developers like me 73, Dave,

I guess I am confused. How does something that someone else is working on, cost them time and energy? Thanks 73 Kent N6WT [email protected]> wrote:

WSJTX Improved (a.k.a wsjtx-devel) is hardly a "hostile fork". The developer of WSJTX Improved is a member of the primary WSJTX development team and wsjtx-devel is his "test bed" for items that may be

Well cool then! I'll go back. I guess I should stick to stuff I know -- if I can ever find out what that is... Thanks, Earl / KD5XB e e Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) secure

WSJT-X Improved is not a hostile fork. It is written by Uwe DG2YCB who is also on the development team for WSJT-X. Bruce McLain bruce.mclain@...

After this post, I uninstalled WSJT-X "Improved" and went back to WSJT-X. I find that I can hardly operate it! I have some learning to do -- but perhaps I've done the right thing. Happy New Year,

thanks. 73 de Salvatore (I4FYV)

Thanks Tom, I'll check this. Hasan [email protected]> wrote:

A "hostile fork" is any branch that fails to follow the the limitations of the original developer and which is not merged back into the primary development map.

So, any new spot that comes in within 15 minutes of the current spot will not show up on the screen, but right-clicking on the spot and showing sports near XXX should show other stations that have

Tom, 15 minutes Hasan [email protected]> wrote:

In SpotCollectors configuration, you might see what you have the Maximum separation time set to in the Combination Criteria pane. Tom-KQ5S

Tom, I'll have to wait until a spot from someone else shows up in SC, and I'll try that. Tnx, 73, N0AN Hasan [email protected]> wrote:

Will do! My first experience in FORTRAN was on an IBM 1620 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1620 ). Its answer to 1 + 1 was always something like 1.99999998. -- John P. WA2FZW

If you right-click on the spot for TX7N and then choose "Display spots of TX7N near XXXX" does your call show up there? Tom-KQ5S

I may have found the answer to my own question. It may be because every time I have spotted TX7N it has already been spotted (but I sure don't see it in my list), and therefore SC doesn't display

I see the update in the N6WS connect window when I spot TX7N, but I never see my spot appear in the SC table. If other people spot TX7N it appears in the list. ...and yes, I have Big CTY Overrides and

hello, Dave, what do you mean with "hostile forks"? Just for sake of curiosity. 73 de Salvatore (I4FYV)