¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: DRAKE TECHNICAL NET UPDATE ( March 21, 2021 )
Tried to check in but band wasn't cooperating in SC. W4BRX
By Jim Barnard · #56307 ·
Re: DR7 fitting partial success.
I don't suppose you kept copies of those service bulletins? 73 -Jim NU0C "Gary Follett" <xntrick1948@...> wrote:
By Jim Shorney · #56306 ·
Re: DR7 fitting partial success.
I remember being at work in 1978, having a chat with a few fellow workers. Two of them were hams. I announced to my ham friends that I had planned to purchase a new TR7, not specifically saying
By Gary Follett · #56305 ·
Re: DRAKE TECHNICAL NET UPDATE ( March 21, 2021 )
I hated I missed it, I got in at the very end after check ins finished. Yes, conditions were pretty bad. I couldn't even hear Ron even though he's only a couple hundred miles west of me.
By Billy Pickering · #56304 ·
Re: TR-7 versus TR7
Interestingly, legend has it that Bob had a fondness for British sports cars which had some impact on how he named radios. My brother had a TR-6 (four wheel version). Seems to me like he was always
By Jim Shorney · #56303 ·
Re: Drake SP-75 Question
Thank you, Jim. ¡ªSteve, W?PZ
By Steve Beaman <beamanator@...> · #56302 ·
DRAKE TECHNICAL NET UPDATE ( March 21, 2021 )
The Drake tech net today had 16 check-ins under very poor band conditions. We had the following mix of Drake radio's. TR-4(X) = 4 TR-5 = 3 TR-7 = 3 C TWINS = 2 73'S, Mark, WB0IQK
By M Gilger · #56301 ·
TR-7 versus TR7
Hmmmmm....nothing looks cast in stone. Wikipedia shows the Triumph with no hyphen (TR7) in the whole article. Drake shows the radio as "*TR7*" on the front page of the manual, and on the front panel
By VE7PS · #56300 ·
Re: MN2000
Yeah, it's sort of a dark gray. I thought maybe I had a pic of mine with the green knobs. I'll do that later. I'm more of a function over form guy. It it does the job I don't care how it looks. In my
By Jim Shorney · #56299 ·
Re: Drake SP-75 Question
No, the SP75 came with 4 pin aviation connectors like what were common for mic connectors on rigs of that era. https://www.americanradiosupply.com/gx164-4-pin-male-aviation-panel-connector/ There
By Jim Shorney · #56298 ·
Re: MN2000
Jim: You are right about the A model being green...or at least the cabinet is.? Front panel looks like dark gray??? But maybe I have only ever seen them in B & W QST's!!!? Not too many of those
By VE7PS · #56297 ·
Re: DR7 fitting partial success.
No, I mean the TR7, not the TR-7. 73 -Jim NU0C "VE7PS" <ve7ps@...> wrote:
By Jim Shorney · #56296 ·
Re: MN2000
Commercial version of Lew McCoy's "Ultimate Transmatch" described in the linked article. This is what mine looks like (except for the outer knobs).
By Jim Shorney · #56295 ·
Re: MN2000
Wasn¡¯t Murch on the Adams Family? Sorry couldn¡¯t resist! Ron W5SUM
By Ronnie Hull - W5SUM · #56294 ·
Re: MN2000
For a minute there, I thought you had said "Murch better, and beefier than many current tuners." Thanks, Barry - N4BUQ
By n4buq · #56293 ·
Re: DR7 fitting partial success.
Guess pics can't be embedded...
By VE7PS · #56292 ·
Re: DR7 fitting partial success.
Jim - I would challenge your claim of the 1st blue TR-7.? I would think that belongs to Triumph Motors, 3 years before the Drake!? ;-) TRIUMPH TR7 BUYER'S GUIDE | Classics World 73 Peter VE7PS
By VE7PS · #56291 ·
Re: MN2000
None of us know everything. ¡®Murch¡¯ is an old school brand of basic, well built, tuners. Much better, and beefier than many current tuners. 73 de Steve, NR4M
By Steve Bookout, NR4M · #56290 ·
Re: MN2000
I know you're going for the look, but if you just want to get on 160 cheaply, pick up one of the MFJ-986 or similar - the differential T-Tuner.? A fast and easy to use legal limit option, usually
By Eric W7EV · #56289 ·
Re: Drake SP-75 Question
I didn¡¯t word that quite right. I don¡¯t intend to mod the SP-75. Just the ends of the cable connectors. ¡ª Steve, W?PZ
By Steve Beaman <beamanator@...> · #56288 ·