¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Pxx connectors

 

Hello Alessandro.
The schematic can be found


P1 can be used for voltage input.? It would?bypass the switch and input protection diode on the V6.
? ? ?This is similar to earlier revisions, except the Drain voltage to the finals is not a separate wire/node.? It is connected on the PCB to a common +12V.
? ? ?To supply a different voltage to the finals, a PCB trace would need to be cut.
P2 is an alternate antenna connection? (like used on earlier revisions) Also a handy probe point for a high impedance instrument.
P5 was designed for an internal battery pack (and also a handy place to tap input Voltage - diode Vt)

Rgds,
Gary


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

AMBE owns the implementation of the open standard in their silicon, not the specification the chip was designed to - that was designed by JARL and is an open standard.

As others noted, open source implementations are possible, and can be experimented with today.

Manufacturers seem to prefer to license their AMBE intellectual property rather than re-invent the wheel, but that doesn't mean AMBE chips or Intellectual Property are required to support D-Star.

The take-aways:
- D-Star is an open standard
- AMBE chips are not required to support D-Star
- Open Source Codecs are available to experiment with home brew D-Star

In my opinion, employing an AMBE chip in a home brew design isn't out-of-line with what Amateur Radio is about, it is an expedient to achieve a goal - much like using an off-the-shelf RF deck to build a home-brew radio or amplifier, but I also agree "opinions vary."

Ken, N2VIP

On Oct 15, 2021, at 15:29, Jerry Gaffke via groups.io <jgaffke@...> wrote:

The D-Star spec might be public, but it all seems rather murky.
As you say, it is implemented by buying something like that proprietary ABME chip,.
FreeDV, on the contrary, has code available that can run on a low end ARM processor.
That seems more in line with what Amateur Radio should be.
Clearly, opinions vary.


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

I do t think they are doing anything wrong, there are several approved radios that support HF DSTAR -IC-9100, IC-7100, IC-705 - it isn't a hobbyist experiment so much as an under-utilized mode included with several radios.

Flex supports HF D-Star with the addition of an appropriate decoder chip on a USB port on several of their HF Radios.

Ken, N2VIP

On Oct 16, 2021, at 10:01, Tom, wb6b <wb6b@...> wrote:

So are the folks experimenting with D-Star on HF just kind of flying under the radar?

Tom, wb6b


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

Hi,

This is all interesting information. I'm back in the reading mode exploring the things that have come up in the posts.?

One would think that "advanced multi-band excitation coding" (AMBE) being invented so long ago would be easily improved upon. But, sometimes the fundamental design is well done and not a compromise that was realizable with the technology of the time (circa 1990), that it stands the test of time. Certainly would not need the expensive custom codec chips; now that it can be implemented in software on current microprocessor chips.?

One thing that occurred to me might be a sort of "earth-to-mars" mode. Where each operator's voice, in a conversation, is stored/buffered and sent at a significantly lower bit rate to the destination. This could allow for having voice conversations under significantly reduced signal to noise ratios, facilitating better DX communication. Albeit with a turnaround delay for each side to pick up on their side of the conversation. Maybe would give each side some time to think a bit before they start speaking again to reply. Would also produce sort of an intriguing feeling of suspense, waiting for the data stream, in the noise, to end so you can listen the reply from the distant other location.?

So are the folks experimenting with D-Star on HF just kind of flying under the radar?

Tom, wb6b


Re: New kit: QDX - Digital Transceiver by QRP Labs

 

One more question: which is the tx and rx bandwidth? For example, if I
wanted to create a wide FSK mode, just like 3G or 4G ALE (rev C or D of
MIL STD 188-141 and 188-110), would it be possible?

73 Rafael PU2UIT
Rhizomatica

On 10/14/21 9:53 PM, Hans Summers wrote:
Hi Rafael

As Jerry said... It's a matter of optimization. Most currently popular
ham digi modes are sequential FSK modes (single carrier). FT8 accounts
for more digi mode activity than all the others put together. A good
SSB rig is a more complex and costly transceiver and that's what's
needed for multi-carrier modes.?

73 Hans G0UPL


Pxx connectors

Alessandro Santucci
 

I'm sorry, I was not able to find the related topics in past messages, so once more a questione about these connections. Is there anyone can exp'lain what are the P2 and P5 connectors?? I understood the P1 can be used for a 12v source, is it so?? Thanks in advance for any help.? Best 73's? Alex I5SKK


Re: Keys

 

I bought a key kit from a bit back. Not sure if that's the sort of product you're looking for or not.


Reed


Keys

 

A couple of you have shown keys that have been made by various amateurs who manufacture them for sale.? Perhaps those of you who have shown them would be kind enough to send me contact info for these manufacturers - I might want to order a key or two.

Gerry Sherman

Sent by the Thunderbird


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

yepp ... freedv runs on smartmic (sm1000) or inside mchf qrp rig (both with an stm32 chip)

dg9bfc sigi

Am 15.10.2021 um 21:28 schrieb Jerry Gaffke via groups.io:

The D-Star spec might be public, but it all seems rather murky.
As you say, it is implemented by buying something like that proprietary ABME chip,.
FreeDV, on the contrary, has code available that can run on a low end ARM processor.
That seems more in line with what Amateur Radio should be.
Clearly, opinions vary.

From Wikipedia:??

Proprietary codec? ?Like other commercial digital modes (,?,?,?,?,?), D-STAR uses a closed-source proprietary voice codec () that's patented by Digital Voice Systems, Inc. (DVSI)?because it was the highest quality and only codec available in silicon when the system was released. Amateur radio operators do not have access to the specification of this codec or the rights to implement it on their own without buying a licensed product. Amateurs have a long tradition of building, improving upon and experimenting with their own radio designs. The modern digital age equivalent of this would be designing and/or implementing codecs in software. Critics say the proprietary nature of AMBE and its availability only in hardware form (as ICs) discourages innovation. Even critics praise the openness of the rest of the D-STAR standard[]?which can be implemented freely. As of 2017 the patents have expired, as announced by Bruce Perens, K6BP at the 2017 ARRL/TAPR DCC in his State of Digital Voice talk.

Would be interesting to see what Bruce Perens thinks about D-Star these days.
He's one of the original forces behind the FreeDV codec (didn't write it, but encouraged its development).

Jerry, KE7ER

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:02 PM, Ken Hansen wrote:
The d-Star mode is open source, the chip that the two radio manufacturers use is proprietary, but it is only out of convenience that Icom and Kenwood use the AMBE vocoder. Just as Yaesu and Alinco use the same chip to implement C4FM and DMR
?
Of course, one would need to learn Japanese to read the D-Star specifications, but they are public, were developed by JARL, and are available for anyone to implement without license fee.
?
?


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

Thanks, I wasn't aware of the open source codec.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:15 PM, Rafael Diniz wrote:
AMBE is just the audio codec (source coding), it has nothing to do with
the actual channel coding (modulation), right?

And indeed, AMBE patents already expired some time ago... and there are
some open source implementations hanging around for some time, eg:


For eg., freedv uses codec2 or LPCNet for audio coding.


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

The D-Star spec might be public, but it all seems rather murky.
As you say, it is implemented by buying something like that proprietary ABME chip,.
FreeDV, on the contrary, has code available that can run on a low end ARM processor.
That seems more in line with what Amateur Radio should be.
Clearly, opinions vary.

From Wikipedia:??

Proprietary codec? ?Like other commercial digital modes (,?,?,?,?,?), D-STAR uses a closed-source proprietary voice codec () that's patented by Digital Voice Systems, Inc. (DVSI)?because it was the highest quality and only codec available in silicon when the system was released. Amateur radio operators do not have access to the specification of this codec or the rights to implement it on their own without buying a licensed product. Amateurs have a long tradition of building, improving upon and experimenting with their own radio designs. The modern digital age equivalent of this would be designing and/or implementing codecs in software. Critics say the proprietary nature of AMBE and its availability only in hardware form (as ICs) discourages innovation. Even critics praise the openness of the rest of the D-STAR standard[]?which can be implemented freely. As of 2017 the patents have expired, as announced by Bruce Perens, K6BP at the 2017 ARRL/TAPR DCC in his State of Digital Voice talk.

Would be interesting to see what Bruce Perens thinks about D-Star these days.
He's one of the original forces behind the FreeDV codec (didn't write it, but encouraged its development).

Jerry, KE7ER


On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:02 PM, Ken Hansen wrote:
The d-Star mode is open source, the chip that the two radio manufacturers use is proprietary, but it is only out of convenience that Icom and Kenwood use the AMBE vocoder. Just as Yaesu and Alinco use the same chip to implement C4FM and DMR
?
Of course, one would need to learn Japanese to read the D-Star specifications, but they are public, were developed by JARL, and are available for anyone to implement without license fee.
?
?


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

AMBE is just the audio codec (source coding), it has nothing to do with
the actual channel coding (modulation), right?

And indeed, AMBE patents already expired some time ago... and there are
some open source implementations hanging around for some time, eg:


For eg., freedv uses codec2 or LPCNet for audio coding.

Rafael

On 10/15/21 10:02 PM, Ken Hansen wrote:
The d-Star mode is open source, the chip that the two radio
manufacturers use is proprietary, but it is only out of convenience
that Icom and Kenwood use the AMBE vocoder. Just as Yaesu and Alinco
use the same chip to implement C4FM and DMR

Of course, one would need to learn Japanese to read the D-Star
specifications, but they are public, were developed by JARL, and are
available for anyone to implement without license fee.


<>

Personally, the AMBE chip (at about $20 in single qty) seems like a
bargain compared with other methods of implementing D-Star, DMR, C4FM,
etc., but opinions vary.

I can buy an AMBE board for about $150 and 'operate' D-Star on my
windows PC w/o a radio (but what fun is that?):

<>


<>

That $150 board costs so much because it not only has the $20 AMBE
chip, but also a fair amount of other technology to support serial,
USB, WiFi AND Ethernet connectivity.

Ken, N2VIP

On Oct 15, 2021, at 10:19, Tom, wb6b <wb6b@...> wrote:

?
Hi,
?
I¡¯ve ben doing a bit more reading on amateur radio digital voice
modes used on HF.
?
To focus on one possibility for a digital voice mode that may be
compatible with nonlinear RF finals, I discovered that D-Star is
being experimented with by some hams on HF.
?
D-Star uses GMSK, Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying on VHF/UHF. Best I
can tell the modulation mode is not changed in the HF world.
?
If so, this might be a way to add a voice mode to digital only modes
transceivers, with simple nonlinear RF output stages, like the QDX.?
?
D-Star uses a proprietary codec, so what I¡¯d *suggest is use the
frequency shift (GMSK) modulation method but swapping out the D-Star
codec for the FreeDV codec.?*
?
Any major flys in the ointment here? Other than getting ham radio
operators interested in yet another voice mode?
?
There are, also, multiple frequency shift modes that might offer some
advantages. But GMSK seems the likely starting point for
experimentation or at least for this conversation.
?
I know there are folks that have gained much more knowledge of this
area than my beginnings at sorting through this area of knowledge.
Hopefully some of those folks will be able to add some practical
additional knowledge on the subject.
?
Tom, wb6b
?


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The d-Star mode is open source, the chip that the two radio manufacturers use is proprietary, but it is only out of convenience that Icom and Kenwood use the AMBE vocoder. Just as Yaesu and Alinco use the same chip to implement C4FM and DMR

Of course, one would need to learn Japanese to read the D-Star specifications, but they are public, were developed by JARL, and are available for anyone to implement without license fee.


Personally, the AMBE chip (at about $20 in single qty) seems like a bargain compared with other methods of implementing D-Star, DMR, C4FM, etc., but opinions vary.

I can buy an AMBE board for about $150 and 'operate' D-Star on my windows PC w/o a radio (but what fun is that?):




That $150 board costs so much because it not only has the $20 AMBE chip, but also a fair amount of other technology to support serial, USB, WiFi AND Ethernet connectivity.

Ken, N2VIP

On Oct 15, 2021, at 10:19, Tom, wb6b <wb6b@...> wrote:

?
Hi,
?
I¡¯ve ben doing a bit more reading on amateur radio digital voice modes used on HF.
?
To focus on one possibility for a digital voice mode that may be compatible with nonlinear RF finals, I discovered that D-Star is being experimented with by some hams on HF.
?
D-Star uses GMSK, Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying on VHF/UHF. Best I can tell the modulation mode is not changed in the HF world.
?
If so, this might be a way to add a voice mode to digital only modes transceivers, with simple nonlinear RF output stages, like the QDX.?
?
D-Star uses a proprietary codec, so what I¡¯d suggest is use the frequency shift (GMSK) modulation method but swapping out the D-Star codec for the FreeDV codec.?
?
Any major flys in the ointment here? Other than getting ham radio operators interested in yet another voice mode?
?
There are, also, multiple frequency shift modes that might offer some advantages. But GMSK seems the likely starting point for experimentation or at least for this conversation.
?
I know there are folks that have gained much more knowledge of this area than my beginnings at sorting through this area of knowledge. Hopefully some of those folks will be able to add some practical additional knowledge on the subject.
?
Tom, wb6b
?


Re: New kit: QDX - Digital Transceiver by QRP Labs

 

Thanks Hans. Now I understood. And indeed, a well optimized modem with
good FEC using single carrier FSK can be very good for digital
communication too, as you mention.

I want one! Lets us know when there is more in stock.
; )

Rafael

On 10/14/21 9:53 PM, Hans Summers wrote:
Hi Rafael

As Jerry said... It's a matter of optimization. Most currently popular
ham digi modes are sequential FSK modes (single carrier). FT8 accounts
for more digi mode activity than all the others put together. A good
SSB rig is a more complex and costly transceiver and that's what's
needed for multi-carrier modes.?

73 Hans G0UPL


Re: New kit: QDX - Digital Transceiver by QRP Labs

 

Understood. Indeed, very neat optimized design. Thanks Jerry.

Rafael

On 10/13/21 7:30 PM, Jerry Gaffke via groups.io wrote:
Exactly.? A non-linear power amp allows it to be optimized
for it's intended purpose.? It does not attempt to do everything.

If you need multiple simultaneous tones, there are dozens of
SSB transmitters you can choose from.??
But they won't be as cheap or as efficient with the power supply.

Jerry, KE7ER

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:02 AM, Rafael Diniz wrote:

And why does this limitation exists? Because of the non-linear power
amplifier? Most of digital telecommunication these days are OFDM /
GFDM... always multi-carrier.


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

I believe these are the current regs for the USA:? ? ?http://www.arrl.org/part-97-text
According to 97.305(c), emissions described in 97.307(f).3 can be used on HF below 10m,
Here is the text of 97.307(f).3:
"(3) Only a RTTY or data emission using a specified digital code listed in ¡ì97.309(a) of this part may be transmitted. The symbol rate must not exceed 300 bauds, or for frequency-shift keying, the frequency shift between mark and space must not exceed 1 kHz."

There have been attempts to change this, here's an effort by the ARRL in 2013:


The FCC responded with this proposed rule in 2016:


So far as I know, the regs have not changed.
But I have not been paying attention lately.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM, Jerry Gaffke wrote:
I believe section?97.307(f) of the FCC Rules still places a maximum symbol rate of 300 baud on emissions below 10 meters.


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

Tom,

I like where you are going with this.
I have zero interest in a proprietary codec like DStar on HF.? Or on VHF for that matter.
Having looked into FreeDV a few years ago, am convinced that's a good way to go.

Primary issue:?
I believe section?97.307(f) of the FCC Rules still places a maximum symbol rate of 300 baud on emissions below 10 meters.
This is stupid and archaic, it is gotten around by using multiple simultaneous carriers on the faster digital modes.
Which means a linear amp must be used on the HF bands for a digital mode fast enough to support real time voice.
Either method winds up occupying about the same bandwidth, the regs should simply state a maximum bandwidth.

That's for the USA.
Regs in other countries might not be quite so brain dead.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:13 AM, Tom, wb6b wrote:
Hi,
?
I¡¯ve ben doing a bit more reading on amateur radio digital voice modes used on HF.
?
To focus on one possibility for a digital voice mode that may be compatible with nonlinear RF finals, I discovered that D-Star is being experimented with by some hams on HF.
?
D-Star uses GMSK, Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying on VHF/UHF. Best I can tell the modulation mode is not changed in the HF world.
?
If so, this might be a way to add a voice mode to digital only modes transceivers, with simple nonlinear RF output stages, like the QDX.?
?
D-Star uses a proprietary codec, so what I¡¯d suggest is use the frequency shift (GMSK) modulation method but swapping out the D-Star codec for the FreeDV codec.?
?
Any major flys in the ointment here? Other than getting ham radio operators interested in yet another voice mode?
?
There are, also, multiple frequency shift modes that might offer some advantages. But GMSK seems the likely starting point for experimentation or at least for this conversation.
?
I know there are folks that have gained much more knowledge of this area than my beginnings at sorting through this area of knowledge. Hopefully some of those folks will be able to add some practical additional knowledge on the subject.
?
Tom, wb6b
?


Re: HF Digital Voice Modulation modes

 

Hi,
?
I¡¯ve ben doing a bit more reading on amateur radio digital voice modes used on HF.
?
To focus on one possibility for a digital voice mode that may be compatible with nonlinear RF finals, I discovered that D-Star is being experimented with by some hams on HF.
?
D-Star uses GMSK, Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying on VHF/UHF. Best I can tell the modulation mode is not changed in the HF world.
?
If so, this might be a way to add a voice mode to digital only modes transceivers, with simple nonlinear RF output stages, like the QDX.?
?
D-Star uses a proprietary codec, so what I¡¯d suggest is use the frequency shift (GMSK) modulation method but swapping out the D-Star codec for the FreeDV codec.?
?
Any major flys in the ointment here? Other than getting ham radio operators interested in yet another voice mode?
?
There are, also, multiple frequency shift modes that might offer some advantages. But GMSK seems the likely starting point for experimentation or at least for this conversation.
?
I know there are folks that have gained much more knowledge of this area than my beginnings at sorting through this area of knowledge. Hopefully some of those folks will be able to add some practical additional knowledge on the subject.
?
Tom, wb6b
?


Re: Conversi¨®n v5 lcd a v6 tft

 

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:15 AM, lu7yw wrote:
I'm trying to install a TFT screen (not Nextion) on a uBitx v5, I've connected everything according to the documentation for version 6, I use the INO files from version 6.3.1 but I can't get the screen to show anything, it just appears white.
Any help from now Thank you very much!!!
LU7YW
Are you shorting the J1 'jumper' on the on the TFT module to put it into "5V tolerant" mode?
Gary


Re: Conversi¨®n v5 lcd a v6 tft

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Mario:

Suggest directly contacting Ashar and ask your question.
Since Reed put allot of effort in improving on and also making Ashar¡¯s firmware accessible for vision impaired Hams, he may be able to answer your question.
<greenkid336600@...>:

73 Dave WD8AJQ
[A Blind Ham]

Sent from for Windows

?

From: lu7yw
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 6:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Conversi¨®n v5 lcd a v6 tft

?

Jack, I fully understand what you are saying.

The issue is that in the original firmware of Ashar Farham nowhere makes reference to the library of the tft screen.

That's why I'm so puzzled.

?