Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
#case #parts
#parts
I ordered a uBITX case kit from Sunil at amateurradiokits.in several weeks ago. After ordering the standard case, I realized I wanted to upgrade to the NEXTION 5 inch one.? ?My confused ordering efforts were patiently handled by Sunil and I was rewarded with a marvelous case kit with all the necessary hardware and extra features of AGC, Audio and preps for future mods.? The powder coating was beautiful and everything was high quality.? The packing and shipping was very satisfactory and I was surprised at the speed of delivery.? Sunil was a pleasure to work with.? Thank you, Sunil!
|
Jack, W8TEE
The thing that made me nervous about it was they didn't say it was compatible with the Arduino IDE or its libraries.? If it was compatible, they would have said that. Jack, W8TEE
On Tuesday, January 7, 2020, 11:57:18 AM EST, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:
The RobotDyn SAMD21 board looks similar, but is not a Nano plug in replacement. For starters, there are 14 pins on each side vs 15 on the Nano. The Raduino uses all available Nano pins, so the RobotDyn board will be short two. The pin functions printed on the silkscreen show no attempt at compatible pin ordering between the RobotDyn and the Nano. It is a 3.3v processor vs 5.0v for the Nano. Not a deal breaker but could require a few adjustments to be made. Jerry, KE7ER On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 08:12 AM, <wb2cba@...> wrote:
I found this on amazon. It looks like it is pin compatible with arduino nano. I wonder if this can be used to replace nano with arm processor alternative. -- Jack, W8TEE |
Thanks Kees, The only drawback we've found is that you can only use 3.3V compatible I/O as the Teensy 4's input/output pins are NOT 5 volt tolerant. ?Bear that in mind when using it. ?We spell that out explicitly in all our documentation. Jim, W0EB
------ Original Message ------
From: "Kees T" <windy10605@...>
Sent: 1/7/2020 10:03:48 AM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] New Teensy 4.0 to NANO direct plug in adapter #ubitx #v6 Good job TSW Gang. This may be applicable to other Nano projects. |
Evan, My webpage's host (private server) has requested I NOT put a PayPal link on the page - he is feuding with them. You can order by sending the listed fee via PayPal to w0eb@... Jim, W0EB
------ Original Message ------
From: "Evan Hand" <elhandjr@...>
Sent: 1/7/2020 10:41:00 AM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] New Teensy 4.0 to NANO direct plug in adapter #ubitx #v6 Jim, |
The RobotDyn SAMD21 board looks similar, but is not a Nano plug in replacement.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
For starters, there are 14 pins on each side vs 15 on the Nano. The Raduino uses all available Nano pins, so the RobotDyn board will be short two. The pin functions printed on the silkscreen show no attempt at compatible pin ordering between the RobotDyn and the Nano. It is a 3.3v processor vs 5.0v for the Nano. Not a deal breaker but could require a few adjustments to be made. Jerry, KE7ER On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 08:12 AM, <wb2cba@...> wrote:
I found this on amazon. It looks like it is pin compatible with arduino nano. I wonder if this can be used to replace nano with arm processor alternative. |
Re: UBITX6 Will Not Select 17 Meters
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýJust catching up. ?As I recall the JackAl mod didn¡¯t allow you to select 17 meters from the display (could type in 18.xxx mhz though)... and I remember a post from Jack saying that the uBITx was not designed for 17 meters... but I guess it was since its on the v6 display??? ? That¡¯s not confusing. ?MRM_._,_._,_ -- ¡_. _._ |
I found this on amazon. It looks like it is pin compatible with arduino nano. I wonder if this can be used to replace nano with arm processor alternative.
RobotDyn - SAMD21 M0-Mini 32-bit ARM Cortex M0 Core Compatible with Arduino M0 Form Mini and Pinhead soldered- Arduino m0 pro Compatible SAMD21 M0-Mini 32-bit ARM Cortex M0 core (Pinheaders Soldered) 73 Barb WB2CBA |
Re: UBITX6 Will Not Select 17 Meters
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 10:36 PM, Andy_501 wrote:
Andy, try this:? /g/BITX20/message/74213 ?- Bill? KB3T |
OOps, somehow I missed getting that manual in the website's main directory as well as in the documentation directory so all browsers could find it. ?Should be there now, but just in case here it attached as a PDF file for you Skip. sorry about that, Jim - W0EB
------ Original Message ------
From: "Skip Davis via Groups.Io" <skipnc9o@...>
Sent: 1/6/2020 11:06:11 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] New Teensy 4.0 to NANO direct plug in adapter #ubitx #v6 Jim I tried to see the adapter board manual and the link returned the dreaded 404 message, you might check it at your end. |
Re: [BITxV6] Rcvr audio quality & diagnostic processes
Andy,
I have found that the BFO adjustment will make the uBitx sound terrible, tinny and full of high pops. Adjusted properly, the rigs (I have 3) all sound good.? Not great like my IC-7300, but good. I would recommend trying the attached procedure, assuming that you have a device with internet and mic capability.? It works well, and will let you know visually that the rig's BFO is adjusted as best it can be. NOTE: you will need a microphone connected and allow access to it to use the audio spectrum analyzer on the HFSignals web page. It works with my ipads and iphones if you do not have a pc/laptop with mic. Original post from Farhan: /g/BITX20/message/74079 73 Evan AC9TU |
Re: CW Audio High Pitched and Thin
#cw
Thanks John,
?
I hadn't seen that setting before. I'm sure that is the same setting that is available in Memory Manager. I will give it a try tonight.? ? I did not understand that there was a separate BFO calibration for SSB and CW.? Can anyone explain why there needs to be a separate BFO calibration for CW? 73, Dean |
Re: CW Audio High Pitched and Thin
#cw
Hello Dean,
I simply used the settings from the menu on the rig. First enable settings, then return to the menu and extra settings are available like for the ssb bfo adjustment. I set mine so that I cut as much as possible the higher audio tones. It means that I most likely let some of the low audio frequencies of the opposite side band through, but it is more pleasant than the full ssb bandwidth when listening to cw imo. 73, John |
Re: ubitx v3 cw problem
I'd strip it down. Put it back to original specs, then work your way up. Just my 2 cents worth.? On Tue, Jan 7, 2020, 1:16 AM Ron-NE0X story <ne0xron@...> wrote:
|
ubitx v3 cw problem
Ron-NE0X story
how much news can the fake news fake, while the fake news fakes, fake news? i have a v3 i took on trade, wont work on cw, has a small board added that has something to do with cw, has a push button switch on it. im trying to find out what it is and maybe determine if i am doing something incorrectly or should just remove the board? ron ne0x |
Re: CW Audio High Pitched and Thin
#cw
Thanks Evan,
I used Memory Manager previously to set the BFO and master calibration for SSB and as far as I can tell they are spot on.? I am comfortable with using it. There is the CW (L/U) BFO Calibration setting (see below).? I presume this is the one you are referring to.? Can you or anyone explain what this value does and what range of values I should? try?? I believe I read on Ian's site to set it to 700 - but that did not seem to make any difference. Thanks, Dean |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýJim I tried to see the adapter board manual and the link returned the dreaded 404 message, you might check it at your end.Skip Davis, NC9O? On Jan 6, 2020, at 19:50, Jim Sheldon <w0eb@...> wrote:
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss