开云体育

Quick answer: Michael, you can set that frequency range anyway you want. ?It’s been along time since mine was stock, but I think it easily did the 40 m band.

I quickly took information from others and created my own little sketch that allows me to do 80 m as well, made a few hardware changes for that and bought an output low pass filter. ?

?I built my Bit40,? but was looking to find some specifications.? Is there a good list of specifications???? The HF Sigs site has some for the uBitx but missing on the Bitx40.?? For instance what should be the frequency range, bottom to top end???? I wanted to know if it goes to the right limits on both end.? Just some verification before I do any mods.

Thanks
73, KM4OLT
Michael

Hi,

If I recall correctly the forty meter filter also passes 30 meters, and the 20 meter filter includes 17 meters. The materials are starting to arrive for my external filters and I intend to build one for each band and not include two bands per filter.

73,

Bill KU8H

--
bark less - wag more

sweep of L17, L18, L19?

Yes, corner is set a high so it can be used on 60m too.

Aha!!!! photo of "80 meter" bandpass filter on my ubitx ...L20, L21, L22 as swept? ..corner frequency is closer to 6 mhz than 4

Jim

Hi, I try to explain that happend to my uBitx, in 40 m dont have trouble , the signal its strong, but when advance in superior bands 20, 15, 10, the noise its very low, I supose was the antenna, but prove with ft-817 and have a strong signal in this bands, I try the BFO settings, gain some signal streng in 20 m no more, any ideas??, Sorry for my English, 73 from Chile.

Punctuation, lad! For lack of a comma, it reads as JW4JM. Still, a neat call. My previous, a selection from those available, was ZL3LH (different region, and vanity calls not implemented in regulations), 'Left Hand' to balance me (dexter being Latin for the right side/hand/arm: skill and sword-arm strength). Present call is a 'vanity', and quite pleasantly fluid to the 'fist'...
73 de ZL2DEX

Allison

I may have needed to define my terms better. It was not -30 dBc but -24 dB referenced to one of the two tones used for testing. That is a figure of merit that I normally use to set drive levels and I consider it the maximum acceptable although, as you point out, there is no spec for most modern equipment and no FCC level other than "must not cause interference outside the signal bandwidth". Modern equipment like the Icom 7300 uses a general specification of -50 dBc for all unwanted emissions and this presumably includes IMD products outside the filter bandpass.

Maybe another way of looking at it: Testing on 80 meters, through a very sharp bandpass filter that limits harmonics and spurs to -60 dBc or better, I set the Drive level to produce +37 dBm on CW. I then put a single tone at -43 dBV into the audio input to get +30 dBm output on SSB. I then increased the tone input in 1 dB increments until I achieved 1 dB of compression. That happened at an audio level of -34 dBV, 9 dB higher than the level to make one watt, and the RF output with that input was +38 dBm. An increase of 9 dB of audio produced an increase of 8 dB in RF output; 1 dB of compression.

I then added a second tone at the same level and measured the difference between one of the tones and the first adjacent product: -15 dB. Opposite sideband products were less than 30 dB down from the primary tone level.

Operation of my radio at the 1 dB compression point results in unacceptable (to me) IMD as well as unacceptable (to everyone) splatter in the opposite sideband and outside the filter sideband on the desired sideband. I could not achieve my desire for -24 dB for the first IMD product with any more than -41 dBV of audio drive which produced an RF output of 1.6 watts.

WA8TOD

开云体育

HI,

Here is a picture of my Nano a Nano ISP programming setup. I used the ISP headers with the pins connected one to one, except for the orange wire connected to pin 10 on the Nano programmed as an ISP to reset on the Nano being programmed.

The ISP header pins are connected internally to pins 11, 12, and 13. Because the Nano on my uBITX does not have the ISP header installed, I described the actual pins used rather than the ISP header pins. The brown wire from reset on the ISP programmer Nano to +5V is the (use with caution) direct short disable reset fix.

Be advised on some boards (Uno vs Nano) pin 1 of the ISP header is rotated by 180 degrees. So double check if you use the ISP headers.?



Tom, wb6b

I wasn't having that problem until I installed the AGC board.? Then, when it happened, I soldered a 10nF ceramic capacitor across the audio pot from high side to ground.? The feedback went away, but I noticed the audio has less high response.
Dan, W2DLC

Glad you're back Gordon.

Bet of luck with your recovery.

73
Dennis W7DRW

"brown lead to the center"

Benjamin,
The wall warts are not all well filtered, so that probably accounts for the hum.? It seems like you audio may not be the problem, because the receiver is naturally quiet if the grounding is good.? You should check the connection of the antenna to the board, because maybe you have a bad solder joint or broken wire. The brwon lead should go to the center of the antenna connector.? Also, there have been reports of poor quality BNC connectors, so you may want to test that or just replace it with a better one.
Dan, W2DLC

Check the potentiometer wiring, there is some mistake on first wiring (inverting high and middle)
73 - remi f1mqj
—-
vérifier le c?blage du Potentiomètre, un schéma de c?blage inversait le milieu et le point chaud

I ve at least 3 Chinese nano boards from various sellers, working fine with arduino ide and windows 8.1 (the only problem I have : it need to be run as administrator -giving strange messages when standard user mode).
73 - Rémi -F1mqj?
—-
j’ai au moins 3 cartes nano chinoises de vendeurs divers, programmées sans problème avec Windows 8.1 et l’ide Arduino (le seul problème est qu’il faut le faire en administrateur- il envoie des messages étranges en mode utilisateur standard).

开云体育

I have come out of surgery now, and I think I’ll be home tonight and may be able to construct voltage divider on my Heathkit Cantenna to get a attenuated signal that I can further attenuate on toward a ICOM 718 S-meter. ? I have about 4 ?fixed attenuator pads. ?Using those, Setting the baseband signal about the same for each test?I should be able to get a “baseline” on a mostly UNmodified version three, I think it has diode to protect Q90