Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: CW PTT attack time to slow
#ubitx
This might be a possible fix:?https://qrpguys.com/ubitx-cw-conditioning-adapter
|
CW PTT attack time to slow
#ubitx
Joop Stakenborg
Hi there,
just finished a ubitx build and I am trying to use it with my K3NG arduino keyer. I have set the CW configuration to straight key. The keyer output is open collector. I get a nice sidetone and there is enough power output, about 11 Watts on 20 meters. But if I use the paddle the PTT response is to slow, either the first ¡®dit' is lost or the first ¡®dah' is turned into a ¡®dit¡¯. Does it help changing the pull-up resistor at the keyer input? Anyone have a suggestion? Regads, Joop PG4I |
Re: uBitx Unfiltered
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:14 AM, Kees T wrote:
Since there is not much shielding between sections on a uBITX, wouldn't it help going to RD16HHF1 (or RD15) part, so at least the MOSFET Source lead can be solidly grounded vs tying it to a "heatsink antenna". I would also make those MOSFET leads ALL "REALLY short".I've side stepped that.? That has been done on every IRF510 amp in Bitx and a big handful more radios out there.??In every case my reaction to that is, it is insane.? ?Everyone I see I tell them heat sink paste, insulator kit, and ground that heat sink.? The difference is better heat remove is the sink is outside the case and less RF all over.? ?So far I know of two kits that do not do that and both are the most stable I've seen maybe they have learned something. Three things shall be done, ground the heatsink, if it is inside a box provide openings to allow convection cooling to happen, and keep the leads on RF power devices short and that includes traces on the board. For those that want to try that:? Get the heatsink and insulator kit.? Bend the leads at the case UP 90 degrees and then install with the case of the mosfet flush to the bottom of the board.? The heat sink is not in an awkward place (under the amp).? Solution is thick aluminum L (.25" minimum) to the rear wall (aluminum) of the box with a finned heatsink outside.? Use insulator kits and (non conductive) thermal transfer paste.? Everything gets bolted up solid for best heat transfer. Allison |
Re: uBitx Unfiltered
I still believe "there is a pony out there" .....small handful of parts and a good dual relay switched LPF board.
73 Kees K5BCQ? Isn't the rest of that is "I can smell it...." Yes ferrite and a few more caps in the right places plus some top pour of copper with stitching to tie it all down so ground (there is no such thing) has less transverse current paths and lower surface resistance.?? Why say that...? Adding parallel caps is useless if the ground it goes to has RF resistance (or inductance).? The DC lines start right next to the power amp so ferrite and caps liberally spread about limits the distribution.? At one point the? R18, R28, R38, and R48 were tried at 330 ohms with 9.6V Zener at each corresponding cap to ground was added.? That stuffed the spurs (not the primary ones) down by 6DB.? ?So yes there undesired RF on the switched DC. Allison |
Amplifier
#ubitx
#ubitx-help
#parts
??? ??????
Hello everyone I want to amplify the power by amplifier so i want the amplifier for it with simple so i want some suggestions
|
Re: UBITX V3 TX GAIN VARIATIONS
Gordon Gibby
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks so much Allison --- now that I have a handle on the harmonics, working on Q90 will be one of my next projects.? ?That looked like the easiest gain target....?? I have read your posts earlier and purchased parts...just need to get that project done
sometime.? ?I have two people inour group planning to build uBitx's.? ?If I can get 10W on 80 and 5 watts on 30 I'll be pretty happy for my digital goals.
I have a transistor amp (and switched LPF system) waiting on me somewhere to connect up.? ?Had to tame the harmonics a bit before that was a possibility.? ?
Cheers,
gordon
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 1:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] UBITX V3 TX GAIN VARIATIONS ?
VEry annoying I attached three things and none followed the post!
So 2n2222A datasheet 2n3904 data sheet and picture of said amp built on Kitsandparts board. |
BITX40 Saving Settings Issue
hamhog1
Just finished putting the BITx40 in an enclosure and most things are working.? I set it up first in the default configuration and tested per directions.? I then installed sketch v.1.28 per instructions and all seemed well. Next I did all the modifications for raduino-v1.28 except the capacitance touch sensor.??
?
One issue is that when I make changes in the Settings and set up the rig for cw operation, when I shut down the rig, I lose all the previous settings for cw and only lsb or usb is available.? When I turn on again the VFO may show the mode as CWU/L but no keyer or ptt and when I go to Settings no CW options.? I am not able to send cw and cw is not shown as one of the modes available when go to Select Mode.? If I do a default reset and then set up cw it works until I shut it down.? Then I lose the settings. Must be missing something.? I downloaded v1.28 again and reinstalled it. No luck.
?
Another issue I have is that the CW Spot does not work.? I have installed a momentary push switch, but it appears to not be grounding the pin.
I am impressed with the rig and it works perfectly when set up either for ssb or cw with the above exceptions.? Only when I shut down, I lose the settings.
?
Thanks for any help.
Gary K4VIG
? |
Re: UBITX V3 TX GAIN VARIATIONS
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 08:46 AM, Kees T wrote:
I was wondering about the reasoning behind using several parallel 2N3904 transistors in the uBITX circuit.....they are inexpensive, but why not just use a single 2N2222 ?For the driver you need about 400mw and one 2n2222A would not do it maybe as push pull as I've run them as linear that way for 500mw. The big thing is the 3904 is high power?and trying spread the load. To me it creates more issues.? Same for the pre-driver. As stated before the 3904 peak HFE is at 10MA and for the 2n2222A its 150MA. For a power amp diminishing HFR with increasing currents means you get non linear operation. However farhan has the bias so high the driver and predriver runs at AB levels.? >>>the BFR106 has the dissipation, but the 3.5 to 5GHz Ft invites instability No it doesn't as the amp is a resistive feedback amp and gain max is 18DB if the device can do that.? A 3904 can but the gain corner is 8mhz and drops from there to about 10db at 30mhz.? For that amp to hit 18DB at 28mhz the device must have an FT of 1100mhz or higher.? Bipolars have FT as a limit for common emitter amps.? For Q90 its works well. For the predriver and driver part none of those listed are better than 2n2222A Though the DXT2222 (ignoring footprint) is also good as it behaves like the TO18 part at high currents.? Other parts are 2n2219A (same die as 2n22222A in TO5/TO39 and can handle more power) but FT limited.? ?The classic 2n3866 is better but FT is 500mhz and the 2n5109 is better still.? This is from better to best. I built an amp using a KITSANDPARTS board (5W CW AMP) with mods using a 2n5109 driving a pair of IRF510s.? The result is flat (within 2DB) power from 3 to 30mhz and at about 26db overall gain.? With 14DBM drive I get 10W and at 20dbm its up to near 17W at 13.8V.? At 20V 20W is easy with additional drive. The only changes were replace his 2219 with 5109, and lift the driver transformer center tap to inject bias there.? Transistors are mounted on top as are the IRF510s and the output transformer and bias transformer? also the bias network are on the underside to allow?for heatsinks (board was designed to take BD139s).? Bias anything in the range of 100 to 350ma was tried but about 180ma per mosfet was about right for linear operation. You need a driver that can product the desired gain across a decade and the transformers have to be better.? The layout must be like its a VHF amp! There are other IRF510 amps that do that or better!? MOSFETs have no FT however impedance matching is a challenge regardless the part. Allison |
Re: ATU for mBITX
I have one of the Chinese tuners, with the plastic, variable capacitors, that I built from a kit.? I found the adjustments to be very touchy and not repeatable.? I have since replaced it with an?MFJ-9201, QRP Antenna Tuner.? It is well made and is a lot easier to use than the Chinese, kit tuner.
|
Gordon Gibby
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý?Wow, that's a pretty complicated printed circuit board....and we already have a ton ofproblems with one laid out by a fellow who has years of experience at it.....wish you good luck!!!? ?
cheers,
gordon
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Ben Holmes <judosandan@...>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 12:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] Any Gerber Experts Round Here? #ubitx #kicad ?
P.S. How 'bout a free PCB for the help?? I'm looking to build this: /g/BITX20/message/54034
|
Re: uBitx Unfiltered
Yes, I think with some low pass, band pass filters it will be useable, especially on 20 and below. I still think it's amazing what can be packed in when one considers the price. When I started out, the cheapest way to get on the air was to get military surplus, in my case a 'wireless set #19' Cost me 50.00, which translates to about 320.00 today, covered 80/40, single 807 final, had terrible chirp, and you had to build a HV supply.
Next rig was a dx60/hr10/hg10. New worked out to about 300.00 CAD, or 1900.00 in today's money. Regardless of the growing pains, we've come a long way! |
Re: Can we start using SUBGROUPS? uBiTX, biTX40, QRPKITS, Original BiTX20, Homebrew, Other?
bands11
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHey folks, ?I guess I need to put my oar in the water, too. ? :-) ? I can¡¯t begin to thank you all for the diversity and variety of topics on this group. ?I admit that some went on to extreme limits, but the very breadth of them have provided me with lots of things to think about and learn about. ?I am grateful for the experts out there who continue to help those who are not so knowledgeable (and sometimes REALLY not so knowledgeable). ?You have made my day on topics well out of my comfort zone. ?Thank you ¡ you know who you are ¡I¡¯ve played with, reprogrammed, and modded my BITX40¡¯s and my uBITX with much glee and abandon! ?I¡¯m having SO much fun at this stage in my life (Novice in 1958 and re-upping in 2008). ?I enjoy the occasional drift into reminiscing of old rigs, Heathkits, and tube gear, the detailed discussions of harmonics and spurs, the offers of rigs for sale (or pieces of rigs), following the parametric analysis of bandwidth and SWR measurements, and some of the EFHW ¡°discussions¡±. BRING IT ON! ?It¡¯s all been for my entertainment, improvement, and learning. Thanks to all of you ¡ and your observations, opinions, and biases! 73 and Highest Regards, Bob KE7QEQ Let¡¯s give a shout-out to all the LIBRARIANS! ?¡ oh, I¡¯m sorry. ? Sigcat |
Power and SWR meter
Dear al,
The newest Power and SWR meter design and for sure home made, small and really accurate. See for more information : /g/RadioStuff Also nice to see the one of a kind CWModem...... 73' PD0LEW, Johan Holstein |
calibration question
#ubitx-help
Two questions:
When I tune in 10MHz WWV in LSB mode on the uBITX, the frequency reads 9.998.500.? Does it mean the rig is out of calibration or is it supposed to read like this in LSB mode?? I note that Fc-BW/2 is exactly what I'm reading on the display so it makes me suspicious.? Before I go through the calibration procedure and potentially screw things up further, I was hoping someone can confirm. BTW, the calibration procedure on hfsignals.com just says find an AM broadcast signal and says nothing about the mode the rig is set to (USB/LSB).? Doesn't the mode matter during calibration?? Thanks! 73 Mike KK7ER |
Re: ATU for mBITX
I have a T1 its the ideal pocket sized ATU.? Excellent battery life? I replace
it once a year on general principle..? I believe it can tune?a nail on 80m. For less than 12W its bullet proof L tuner.? It tunes up well even at 1W and less.? It does so in less than 5 seconds. One hard note while they rate it for a max of 20W I've blown detector diodes?on 40M for some antenna cases.? Its related to power under some reactive condition where the voltage at the atu output exceeds diode tolerance voltage.? It does not show tuning a HW wire at 15W.? It only takes out one diode of the pair. That said for under 15W its easy to use and works very well. I use it with the: KNQ7A (40M) SSB Slop bucket 20 SSB Argonaut 505 (all bands) SSB mostly Tempo-one QRP tube radio (modified,? 12BY7 driver as final about 4-5W) HB 40M SSB HB20M SSB HB15M SSB HB 10M SSB Kistandparts 1W CW WM20? SSB PSK20 PSK31 FT817 with matching interface cable HF Allison |
Re: uBitx Unfiltered
Allison,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Yup, the blowby around the LPF's is at the top of the list of things to fix. Most forum readers seem to have that one figured out. I did say "should" not "will" for a reason. Also, as you originally brought up long ago, those 7dBm mixers are seeing nothing like 7dBm from the si5351, which means they are overdriven at lower signal levels than they should be. Worth keeping in the list when talking about trouble around those IF stages. Jerry On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 08:55 AM, ajparent1/KB1GMX wrote:
However it was assumed the 20M LPF worked as we found out later it does not. |