Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Modification of Allard.
#bitx40help
Hello everybody.
In order to start editing my Bitx40, I take stock of the components I miss. As I chose to modify the code of Raduino, with the version of Allard PE1NWL, I read and translated in French the page "User instructions for Raduino_v1.15". If I understand correctly, I have to buy a 10tours 100k potentiometer, and install the famous function button between A3 and mass. I see in the photo of Allard a capacitor, and I have not seen anywhere this addition. Is it necessary? And if so, what capacity? Thanks again to all for your work and have a nice day. 73 of F1NQP Jean-Jacques |
||
Re: Customs charge
I wonder: has anyone here used DHL and NOT been charged for Customs? Might be a case for removal from hfsigs site. Is there an alternative available from/at that location? India Post is reliable, and not all that significantly slower.
de ZL2DEX who got his, and replacement Raduino, by post - Thanks, Farhan and crew! :). |
||
Re: Customs charge
DHL works fine for shipping into the US. ?Other countries, it can nearly double the price of your Bitx40.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would have gladly paid $10 to avoid the 2 month grand tour of the USPS that my package took. On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 10:19 pm, Lawrence Galea wrote: I wonder why people still continue to use DHL when it has been said here so many time what they do. |
||
Re: ?Raduino v1.26 (eliminate carrier burst, improved calibration method) released
Allard's code does not yet drive the bfo from the si5351.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
He's been careful to minimize the hardware hacks required to use his code. Hacking the bfo like that is a relatively major change. The current code base will continue on as version 1. Version 2, not yet released, will allow us to drive the bfo from the si5351. Should significantly improve calibration accuracy, among other advantages. Jerry On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 09:33 pm, ohwenzelph wrote: Have not used the Raduino yet so have not kept up with the advances with programming/software/sketches. Is it not being used for the BFO as well? Tnx |
||
Re: Customs charge
I wonder why people still continue to use DHL when it has been said here so many time what they do. Just ban them from any of your purchases. Regards Lawrence On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:19 AM, David Wilcox via Groups.Io <Djwilcox01@...> wrote:
|
||
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 29, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
John P
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:28 pm, Tom VE3THR wrote:
Might be time to try an afternoon net for this time of year.I suggested that a week or two ago. Nobody commented. I was thinking 3PM or 4PM on Sunday afternoons. Anybody else have any ideas? ? -- John - WA2FZW |
||
Re: Multiband bitx
I show how I've added a second BPF on my blog:?
In a follow up post I showed how to add a second LPF as well. Only problem is that after much testing I've found it doesn't work well. I have redone it as shown here with a socket compatible with the QRP Labs filters: I even went so far as to rebuild the original Bitx40 LPF on a a board and reinstall it. I'm going to do the same with the BPF section of the circuit (make it pluggable, single band) and just move filters around to get to the band I want. I could probably do mass amounts of switched BPF/LPF's if I wanted, but I actually don't want. I'm going to modify my case so that the top comes off easily and I can change bands in under a minute. To me that seems like good enough without getting crazy. Dual band would be nicer, but this is plenty sufficient. -- Ryan Flowers W7RLF ? ?<-- Learn how to go digital on the BITX40 |
||
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 29, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
I've been fiddling with my Bitx40 this week. I made the LPF pluggable, compatible with QRP Labs filters, so that it's easy to change the LPF out on for another band. I have the stuff to do the BPF too, but haven't got around to that part yet. I sat down to continue with it and noticed the time: 6:43 pm! Surely I could get the radio back together in time for the QSO night. I did. But, no output. Bad solder- whoops! Fixed that, by that time it was almost 7:30pm, no contacts. Darn! I'll try again next weekend.
-- Ryan Flowers W7RLF ? ?<-- Learn how to go digital on the BITX40 |
||
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 29, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
Hi Al, I found the same thing. I had to change my LSB calibration from - 230 to 50ppm. My USB also changed from 2460 to 2564 Hz but it may have been off before as I don't use USB. I guess CQ WW wore out the bands but it did help me get my BitX DXCC total up to 54 73, Willy On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Al Duncan VE3RRD <ve3rrd@...> wrote: Worked Jerry W0PWE and Tom VE3THR. Didn't hear anyone else, not even Willy! |
||
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 29, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
Yup...my big dx contact tonight so far was VE3RRD Al. We live in the same town !!! Nothing else even on 7.274.?
Might be time to try an afternoon net for this time of year. I usually have a HF rig on 7.277 if I'm in the shack during the day. Will be on 277 near the hours tonight if anyone in central or west coast tonight. 73 Tom |
||
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 29, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
Worked Jerry W0PWE and Tom VE3THR. Didn't hear anyone else, not even Willy!
When I tuned in Jerry, I thought he was 2 KHz high, but it turned out it was me that was 2 KHz low. This was my first contact after updating to v1.26 firmware, I had to change my LSB calibration from -340 to +80 to get back on frequency. 73,? AL? VE3RRD |
||
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 29, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
Things seem very quiet on the BitX calling Frequency of 7.277 that is until SW broadcasters arrived. I tried 7.177 and heard nothing. I am on 7.274 now calling CQ. Did work Russ KG0BK in Duduque,IA on 7.277 earlier but that was all I heard. Willy W1LY On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:25 AM, John P <j.m.price@...> wrote:
|
||
Re: Raduino as NBFM TX
One could do it on interrupt. - f On 30 Oct 2017 4:49 am, "Smitty, KR6ZY" <mark-groupsio@...> wrote:
|
||
Re: ??????Raduino v1.26 eliminate carrier burst improved calibration method released
Ah, I get it now.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Alternatively, go to from where you can download the current as well as all previous versions. When you download from that page, the version number will be included in the ZIP filename. 73 Allard PE1NWL On Mon, October 30, 2017 01:03, Dexter N Muir wrote:
Allard, the sketch might be individually named, but the Download button |
||
Re: Customs charge
David Wilcox
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI still have one of the first PFR3s handed to me by Doug himself at FDIM years ago. It is worth every pound you may have paid. ?Have fun. Dave K8WPE On Oct 29, 2017, at 12:36 PM, Philip Thompson <pcteee@...> wrote:
|
||
Re: ???Raduino v1.26 eliminate carrier burst, improved calibration method released
Allard, the sketch might be individually named, but the Download button gets you a Zip file that's always the same name. Simple remedy, Graham: rename the Zip with version number while you move it out of the default download folder. Move it anyway, so the next version doesn't conflict.
Dex, ZL2DEX |
||
Re: Customs charge
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI have received 2 Bitx¡¯s from india Using India post, no extra $10 ?and no customs charges ? Regards Charlie GI4FUE ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Philip Thompson ? Hi folks ?
? |