¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Github's future?

 

Reason at Microsoft has always been focused on how to make more money.
Nothing else.
That's how they got so big.

There probably are plenty of people at Microsoft who like github and want to see it thrive.
But if the bean counters somehow determine that snuffing out github will allow them?
to sell $billions more of their own crapware, that's what will happen.
Plenty of precedent, some of it recent.

Could be that their corporate culture has changed to truly embrace open source,
not just embrace and extinguish.? ?But I'm not holding my breath.
Could be that management currently sees a future in letting github thrive more or less
as it is.? But that could?also change.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 06:46 am, Kevin Timm wrote:
Finally, a voice of reason - thanks Mike
?
73 Kevin?
K5KDT
?
>>>? Github is a platform to serve advertisements to software developers.? The price they pay to advertise is providing free project hosting.? Microsoft would have to be pretty foolish to screw it up.? If they alienate developers they lose their ad revenue.? The mass migration away from Sourceforge a while back should serve as a cautionary tale to them.

73 Mike
KK7ER


Re: Removing surface mounted resistor #ubitx

 

Thanks to all of you that responded, it's good to know that I should be able to work on the SMD components if required.


Re: Current Firmware

Jack Purdum
 

So how do we beginners determine which libraries are missing and where to find them?

I would start by urging programmers to follow the convention I mentioned earlier, which is to provide the download URL for any non-Arduino libraries on the same line as their #include directive. Then at least you've know where to go to download the required libraries.

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, June 6, 2018, 11:07:57 AM EDT, Dennis <dennis@...> wrote:


On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 06:29 am, Jack Purdum wrote:
Missing libraries is a very common error that beginners make
So how do we beginners determine which libraries are missing and where to find them? I'm going to try this exercise on a win10 machine later today. Perhaps it will work better than the mac. I don't understand why we can't be provided with a single compiled file to upload to the Arduino. I would suspect that most hams are not accomplished programmers.


Re: Removing surface mounted resistor #ubitx

 

Thanks Skip. I'll certainly try that before I think about removing R70... Do you think it's worth building the rest of the audio path as per Version 4?


Re: RF power chain mods and improvements..

 

If the mixers are getting hit hard enough to go into compression,?
then we don't really need 12dB of gain in that transmit side 45mhz amp.
May as well back it off to 8 or 6 dB, 0 dB is fine, whatever a 2n3904 can reliably do at 45mhz.
Buy it back with more gain in the little back-side daughterboard.

If we come to a solution here, I'm hoping it resolves mostly to stacking resistors on top of existing parts.
I assume we are just lowering that feedback resistor from collector to base, and then also the bias resistor
from base to ground by a proportional amount.
All stackable, so just put a new 1206 part on top of the existing one.
This happens at Q40, Q20, Q90, Q911, Q92, Q96 to reduce the gains.? Keep the 2n3904's.
?
The daughterboard could have more than a few parts, we have lots of room.
Most current owners will be much more inclined to do the mods if they don't involve replacing a dozen 2n3904's.
The daughterboard is easily reversible, just remove the wires from it to T8-5 and the top pin of RV1, then restore C82.
(T8-5 and RV1-1 are through-hole pins, easily accessible from the bottom.)

Maybe kit up the daughterboard along with some other needed stuff, such as parts for a dummy load?
and a diode RF probe.? Would add about $1 to the cost.

Jerry


Re: Current Firmware

 

Hi Dennis,

It looks like what you are trying to compile is, the code you would see if you clicked on "view source code" in your browser while looking at the code on GitHub. Of course, it is possible that something was temporary wrong at GitHub when you tried to download the code.

Try this link to download the zip file for the code.?

I believe the CEC firmware has compiled HEX files available. There were instructions for how to install a program on Windows that could program an Arduino from the HEX file. In my case, as I have a Mac, it was just easier to compile the CEC software and upload it from the Arduino Sketch.?

Hopefully the number of errors you get, if any, will be simple "not found" errors as Jack mentioned. Those would be the libraries you would install from the?"Sketch", "Include Library", "Manage Libraries" dropdown. Jack also points out that libraries can be downloaded directly from URLs, but I think anything needed for the factory firmware would be obtainable using the Sketch user interface.

Hang in there, much of programming and compiling seems counterintuitive. But, once you begin find your way around it starts to make sense. Once it all makes sense you've gone off the deep end and become a real programmer.

Side note: Hmmm. Maybe all those dire warnings about Microsoft and GitHub have so quickly become reality. After all, look at the first error:
"warning: missing terminating ' character
? ? Microsoft is acquiring GitHub!"

The deal hasn't even closed yet, and here we are...

Tom, wb6b


Re: BITX40 CW Carrier Mod - CW Waveform shaping ? #bitx40

 

I went ahead and made the mod as suggested by Allard to improve the CW Carrier Waveform shape on the BITX40.??
The 2.2uF capacitor value to ground wasn't correct (I think Allard based this value on an earlier incorrect comment from me).
I calculated that the required capacitance to achieve a > 5mS rise time on the waveform as about 270 nF so I ended up
using both? a 220 nF and a 47 nF disc capacitor wired in parallel to approximate this.?

Previously I was using a 4K7 resistor between Raduino D6 and C107 for the carrier mod.? I checked output power on CW
as well as residual carrier on LSB with PTT closed with no mic audio, both before and after the mod and noticed no significant changes?
so I don't think that there are any undesirable side-effects from this mod.?

I don't currently have a working scope so I used my FLEX-1500 to monitor the transmitted CW signal from the Bitx40, connected to a dummy load.
PowerSDR has a scope view which allowed me to monitor the shape of the received BITX40 waveform with sufficient resolution to demonstrate a?
noticeable improvement in the the waveform shape.?

I have attached a couple of .PNG files that show the before and after cases. You can see that before the mod the CW waveform was very square looking, whereas
after the changes it has much more of a desirable trapezoidal shape. The received post-mod signal also sounds more pleasing to ear.?

Cheers

Michael VE3WMB?

P.S. Next on my list is to try providing an uninterrupted supply voltage to pin 6 of the LM386 by tombstoning? R111 and feeding the top end of it with +12V.
My hope is that this might reduce or even eliminate the remaining BITX40 audio thump on the TX -> RX transition.?


Re: Current Firmware

 

Too bad the Arduino IDE doesn't have a GUI interface to 'upload' a .hex (or .elf) file.
? ? This would make it easy to share a single 'compiled file'/ machine code and you could just upload to the Arduino.
? ? Easy enough to share the .hex, but the next battle will be you figuring out how to upload it.
There is software available for a P.C. that does

But I haven't found such for a mac, or have a way to test using an intel based 'modern' mac.

You don't have to be an accomplished 'C programmer' to use the Arduino IDE.

I don't see any libraries used in Farhan's supplied code that isn't part of the standard Arduino IDE.

Dennis,
I'd be happy to send you a single 'flat' ino file (the one that the Arduino IDE creates during the compile / linking process) in a private mail if this makes things easier for you to get going.
If you would like this, send me your email address by responding to this post with the "private" button, and I will send you a single file sketch.
I did not clean up the code that generates the compiler warnings.? I have checked that the single flat file? compiles and links.

Regards,
Gary


Re: Building homebrew ubitx: Need pre-v3 schematic PDF. Also, source for 45M15 (45 MHz IF) filter?

Rahul Srivastava
 

How about sweeping a 2-3 xtal filter using 40- or 48MHz xtals... In all possibility they will be 3rd OT.

Rahul VU3WJM



Re: Raduino replacement #bitx20

Mike aka KC2WVB
 

Exactly. I have both the bit40 and uBitX and as far as I can tell the difference is firmware and means of connecting to the main board.?
In the uBitX the firmware uses an encoder to change the vfo and the bitx40 uses a potentiometer.....

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, 9:20 AM M Garza <mgarza896@...> wrote:
The Bitx40 Raduino used to use 2 connectors with wiring harnesses.? ? The uBITx uses a connector and a row of pins.? The pins eliminate the need for the signal wire harness.??
Otherwise, it is basically the same.

Marco - KG5PRT?

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, 5:42 AM Dennis Yancey <bigbluedry@...> wrote:
According to the website, the only difference in the Raduino¡¯s is the firmware. Are you saying this is not the case?


Re: Building homebrew ubitx: Need pre-v3 schematic PDF. Also, source for 45M15 (45 MHz IF) filter?

 

You may check www.rf-microwave . com.? They sell to universities, labs and hams. I bought quite nice stuff from them. Maybe they are not the cheapest but they have them... The owner I was told is or was an eme operator. In practice he is one of us.


Il 06/giu/2018 16:19, "Michael LeBlanc" <michaelleblanc1@...> ha scritto:
I was able to find one at Aliexpress:?
Came in a package of two for $US14.56.

-Michael VE1LEB


Re: Removing surface mounted resistor #ubitx

Nigel G4ZAL
 

I use 2 soldering irons to remove double ended SMD components (kind of like tweezers).
I often use this method over a hot air reflow station, which I also have, but prefer the low(er) heat approach.

Nigel.


Re: Current Firmware

 

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 06:29 am, Jack Purdum wrote:
Missing libraries is a very common error that beginners make
So how do we beginners determine which libraries are missing and where to find them? I'm going to try this exercise on a win10 machine later today. Perhaps it will work better than the mac. I don't understand why we can't be provided with a single compiled file to upload to the Arduino. I would suspect that most hams are not accomplished programmers.


Re: RF chain power mods and improvements

 

It may.? I've considered a compressor with peak clipper for the audio to hold
the level below the distortion point.? Then I looked at why we get distortion (spurs).
I'd still do the audio processing though as it has value other than spur control.

FYI the spurs are mixers hitting the compression point.

I may try a SRA1H and amp up the LO for the 45mhz spot.

Allison


Re: Removing surface mounted resistor #ubitx

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

To Robbie and all that are when I installed the pop fix I connected it to M1 side of C51 which works. At this connection point it will not short out the audio to U1 and your side tone will work. ?The pop fix during TX is turning on the FET essentially grounding the audio input pin on the TDA2822, so yes there will be no side tone. By moving the FET to C51/M1 you will short audio as it comes off the Q70 preamp stage. This has been working for me for several months using Don¡¯s simple 4 part pop fix, thanks Don :-)

Skip Davis, NC9O

On Jun 6, 2018, at 09:48, Robbie Robertson <robbie.robertson@...> wrote:

I have the R3 board, and have tried to duplicate the anti-pop cct from the R4 schematic (current on a proto board).
The mod works ok, in that there is no 'pop' on transitions between TX and RX, but the CW sidetone is no longer coming through the speaker...

I want to try changing the value of R70 from 10, to 1000 Ohms (as per Rev4), but I've never tried removing a surface mounted component before, and a bit scared of damaging the board/resistor (in case I need to put it back).

Can anyone advise how best to go about this please?

I'm even toying with the idea of cutting the tack on either side so I can bridge the gap with a new value (or feed lines to my proto board for testing of various resistances...


Re: K5BCQ kits in BITX40 #bitx40

 

Thanks Doug! And thank you for notifying me of the bad link. I still haven't figured out what went wrong so I deleted the link. Must be something stupid simple (my downfall!).
Don


K5BCQ kits in BITX40 #bitx40

 

For those wondering if the K5BCQ AGC and ClickFix kits work with the BITX40, they do! The AGC works just as well as in the ¦ÌBITX and the ClickFix is, by far, the quietest modification that I have tried. The latter uses the PTT line for keying the receive preamp but that is all explained on the nd6t.com web site. No software changes are necessary unless you use the AGC board as an S meter source (which I recommend) and that is only to calibrate the display to accommodate the improved dynamic range. 73, Don


Re: Building homebrew ubitx: Need pre-v3 schematic PDF. Also, source for 45M15 (45 MHz IF) filter?

 

I was able to find one at Aliexpress:?
Came in a package of two for $US14.56.

-Michael VE1LEB


Re: Removing surface mounted resistor #ubitx

 

There are lots of youtube videos on the SMD.? I would not worry about damaging the small parts as they cost almost nothing.

For a one time deal,you can put lots of solder on the part so it just sort of floats off and grab it with some stainless steel tweezers. Use the old standby of 60/40 or 63/37 tin/lead solder and stay away from the lead free stuff.


What I like to use is hot air.? For about $ 60 including shipping you can get one of the hot air rework stations.? While I doubt they would hold up for much usage, I have one and it works fine for hobby usage.? You get the hot air and a soldering pencil with some very small tips that you need.? It also works well on heat shink tubing.

Find some old computer boards that have the SMD on them and practice to you get the hang of it.??

If you plan on doing much smd work, plan on spending about $ 300 to $ 350 to get some equipment.? Look at an Amscope se400z microscope for just under $ 200, the $ 60 hotair rework station, and various? tweezers and a few other things.

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Robbie Robertson <robbie.robertson@...> wrote:
I have the R3 board, and have tried to duplicate the anti-pop cct from the R4 schematic (current on a proto board).
The mod works ok, in that there is no 'pop' on transitions between TX and RX, but the CW sidetone is no longer coming through the speaker...

I want to try changing the value of R70 from 10, to 1000 Ohms (as per Rev4), but I've never tried removing a surface mounted component before, and a bit scared of damaging the board/resistor (in case I need to put it back).

Can anyone advise how best to go about this please?

I'm even toying with the idea of cutting the tack on either side so I can bridge the gap with a new value (or feed lines to my proto board for testing of various resistances...



Re: Removing surface mounted resistor #ubitx

 

I probably reinvented the wheel but I figured out a trick that helps me with smd components.? I cut a small piece of plastic drinking straw and by sliding it down the tweezers they lock onto the component so you don't have to worry about dropping it.? Sure you can buy expensive tools that do that.? You can also buy an assembled radio.
--