¿ªÔÆÌåÓýDave, I'm sorry I appear to have upset you - in the context of this mail list, I asserted that it would require a significant effort to use a $100ish N100 system in a uBitx, and you agree with me, as best I understand your responses.I never advocated the RPi was a better desktop device than the N100 boards we are generally discussing - I've been discussing embedded applications, like the *current* uBitx design. As for the cost differential, I pushed back on the characterization of the linked-to board as "a bit pricier now" - it's 250% more expensive than the bare RPi 5 board with 8 gigs of RAM, that's not just "a bit pricier" in my opinion, but opinions vary. And I will concede, adding items to an RPi to make it a convenient desktop system does raise the cost beyond the cost of the board alone - obviously - but I am not advocating to use the RPi as a desktop, on the other hand you *are* advocating to use an N100 in an embedded application like the uBitx. If you really feel the need to respond, please, let's take this off-list - I doubt many here are interested in any further discussion on this matter. Ken, N2VIP On Feb 3, 2024, at 17:09, Dave, N1AI <n1ai@...> wrote:
|