¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Concord


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Tony

Dis ¡¯n vreeslike interessante vraag. Mag ek die vraag op PEG vra? Ek sal jou naam uithaal as jy wil?

Groete

·¡±ô²õ²¹²ú¨¦

On 23 May 2025, at 11:22, Tony Moen via groups.io <transed@...> wrote:

Was the outlet pipe loosened and the impeller inspected?
Or
Were the outlet pipe loosened and the impeller inspected?
?
My gut initially voted for the second, my brain wants to know why.
?
So what should my brain tell my gut?
?
1???????????? If the above question is turned into a statement, it becomes (obviously):
The outlet pipe was loosened and the impeller inspected.
The argument here is that the verb is left out in the second clause because it¡¯s the same as in the first and we¡¯re simple avoiding a repetition.
?
If the same principle applies to the question as to the statement, then we would say ¡°Was the outlet pipe loosened and [was] the impeller inspected?¡±
?
2???????????? And of course one could say ¡°were the outlet pipe¡­¡± simply sounds wrong and what I would call the ¡°proximity rule¡± applies, as in the case of ¡°neither the girls nor the boy was at fault¡± (verb agrees with nearest subject).
?
Somehow I could be convinced more readily by argument 1 than by argument 2, but it comes to the same thing.?
?

?


Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.