开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Joseph Yates, a ship’s carpenter, b. 1750, who married Sarah Atmar


 

开云体育

Completely understandable, I also must look at the data and ask myself what this stuff tells me…lol

?

I have attached your file to Joseph in our master on-line genealogy program available at this link:

?

?

This on-line program is part of the hosting and preservation program of the Guild.? It means that whatever we save and upload to it will be there for all access as long as the Guild exists.

?

I plan to do a Beta Test on possibly hosting many trees with the on-line program.? The advantage is the preservation aspect but also leaves it under your control versus hoping your tree will be around after you die at the whim of a retail company such as Ancestry, Heritage, Geni, etc.? Although technically capable of hosting many GEDCOMs I need to understand how it might feel to have that many and what you as the user can do.? That’s why we are doing a Beta test.? I have asked someone to be the Beta user; whenever I get agreement and start the test, I will alert everyone about the test so you can give it a spin as well.? What you may not realize is we have three GEDCOM’s on the system already.

?

If you already know you would be interested in having a GEDCOM uploaded for access and safekeeping, let me know.

?

Regards, Ron Yates

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of John H. Yates
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: john.yates@...
Subject: Re: [yates-one-name-study] Joseph Yates, a ship’s carpenter, b. 1750, who married Sarah Atmar

?

Ron,

The line sometimes blurs (for me) between when we are talking about
my Y-DNA focus and your Autosomal focus. My focus was building a tree
for Joseph Yates, as I always try to do for new suspects. I was
thinking one or more of your suspects did have a known paper trail
to Joseph.

Anyway, I did find Joseph Yates' Revolutionary War record in fold3.
It is attached.

John

On 4/16/23 6:35 PM, Ron Yates wrote:

Yep, understand; the attachment *does NOT show Joseph’s* line.? I know
it is difficult to keep in mind, what I was showing was the seven *DNA
lines that DO match to Leigh*.? From there, we try to infer the best we
can which of the Yates lines Joseph and therefore Leigh might descend from…

My inference is that Joseph and Leigh, */based on the unmasked frequency
of 7 out of 20/*, may very well descend from
Tattersall-Wells-Warfield-Guiney-Tapp line.? Just a guidepost, not proof.

Ron

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.