Hi Guys, looking forward to seeing everyone at nor’easter. ?Per Mike’s note on gamesquad, I’m looking for a first round match on Friday with a start time of about 10-11 AM. ? Please email me if anyone would like to play. ?
-Paul Sidhu
pauls838@...
|
NorEaster TShirt Ordering Cut-off date - Friday Feb 28th
Hi all,
The cut-off date for ordering a NorEaster tshirt is this Friday, February 28th.
After that date, I place the order with our vendor.? I do not order extras, so if you would like one, make sure to register at: and order one!
-Mike
|
NorEaster First Round Matchups
Hi all,
Just 32 days until the NorEaster!
Anyone looking for first round matchups, please use this YASL email list.
This year's TD, Charlie Hamilton,?hamiltoncharliew at gmail dot com?is watching this list, and can help, if you wish.? You can also self-pair, we're pretty laid back on matchups, especially for Round 1.
Best Regards,
Mike
|
Spot on, you don't have prisoners as a priority, but they can spell the difference between a win or a loss sometimes, Vic.
The moral of the story is, as the attacker, you control putting yourself in situations where a rout might cause a surrender. It's something to be looked out for anyway, but even more-so here. Thanks, Carl
The Germans. The Americans fall short on the "provided that" provision. Carl
Interesting. The VC are: “ Provided the Germans have not amassed >= 8 CVP (which would result in an immediate German Victory), the Americans win at Game End if there is no Good Order German MMC in any hex with a coordinate numbered ≥ 5.”
So, let’s say that by the last turn, the Germans have 6 CVP, 4 of which are prisoners (so they would get 4 more CVP for them at game end).? At Game End, the Americans have satisfied their own VC. Who wins? i.e. does the German VC include the game end “bump” for the prisoners? The way the German VC is worded, it’s not entirely clear.
- Len ? Prisoners count double at game end unless an SSR to the contrary is present. Carl On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 2:06 PM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury= [email protected]> wrote: In Not Digging Potatoes, there is a CVP cap for the Americans.? Do prisoners count double immediately should they be captured only at game end?
|
Thanks Carl, you beat me to the answer. Have fun with it Len, Vic.? 
The Germans. The Americans fall short on the "provided that" provision. Carl
Interesting. The VC are: “ Provided the Germans have not amassed >= 8 CVP (which would result in an immediate German Victory), the Americans win at Game End if there is no Good Order German MMC in any hex with a coordinate numbered ≥ 5.”
So, let’s say that by the last turn, the Germans have 6 CVP, 4 of which are prisoners (so they would get 4 more CVP for them at game end).? At Game End, the Americans have satisfied their own VC. Who wins? i.e. does the German VC include the game end “bump” for the prisoners? The way the German VC is worded, it’s not entirely clear.
- Len ? Prisoners count double at game end unless an SSR to the contrary is present. Carl On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 2:06 PM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury= [email protected]> wrote: In Not Digging Potatoes, there is a CVP cap for the Americans.? Do prisoners count double immediately should they be captured only at game end?
|
Finally, not too many Germans in this one, so they may not have the luxury.
The moral of the story is, as the attacker, you control putting yourself in situations where a rout might cause a surrender. It's something to be looked out for anyway, but even more-so here. Thanks, Carl
The Germans. The Americans fall short on the "provided that" provision. Carl
Interesting. The VC are: “ Provided the Germans have not amassed >= 8 CVP (which would result in an immediate German Victory), the Americans win at Game End if there is no Good Order German MMC in any hex with a coordinate numbered ≥ 5.”
So, let’s say that by the last turn, the Germans have 6 CVP, 4 of which are prisoners (so they would get 4 more CVP for them at game end).? At Game End, the Americans have satisfied their own VC. Who wins? i.e. does the German VC include the game end “bump” for the prisoners? The way the German VC is worded, it’s not entirely clear.
- Len ? Prisoners count double at game end unless an SSR to the contrary is present. Carl On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 2:06 PM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury= [email protected]> wrote: In Not Digging Potatoes, there is a CVP cap for the Americans.? Do prisoners count double immediately should they be captured only at game end?
|
The moral of the story is, as the attacker, you control putting yourself in situations where a rout might cause a surrender. It's something to be looked out for anyway, but even more-so here. Thanks, Carl
The Germans. The Americans fall short on the "provided that" provision. Carl
Interesting. The VC are: “ Provided the Germans have not amassed >= 8 CVP (which would result in an immediate German Victory), the Americans win at Game End if there is no Good Order German MMC in any hex with a coordinate numbered ≥ 5.”
So, let’s say that by the last turn, the Germans have 6 CVP, 4 of which are prisoners (so they would get 4 more CVP for them at game end).? At Game End, the Americans have satisfied their own VC. Who wins? i.e. does the German VC include the game end “bump” for the prisoners? The way the German VC is worded, it’s not entirely clear.
- Len ? Prisoners count double at game end unless an SSR to the contrary is present. Carl On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 2:06 PM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury= [email protected]> wrote: In Not Digging Potatoes, there is a CVP cap for the Americans.? Do prisoners count double immediately should they be captured only at game end?
|
The Germans. The Americans fall short on the "provided that" provision. Carl
Interesting. The VC are: “ Provided the Germans have not amassed >= 8 CVP (which would result in an immediate German Victory), the Americans win at Game End if there is no Good Order German MMC in any hex with a coordinate numbered ≥ 5.”
So, let’s say that by the last turn, the Germans have 6 CVP, 4 of which are prisoners (so they would get 4 more CVP for them at game end).? At Game End, the Americans have satisfied their own VC. Who wins? i.e. does the German VC include the game end “bump” for the prisoners? The way the German VC is worded, it’s not entirely clear.
- Len ? Prisoners count double at game end unless an SSR to the contrary is present. Carl On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 2:06 PM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury= [email protected]> wrote: In Not Digging Potatoes, there is a CVP cap for the Americans.? Do prisoners count double immediately should they be captured only at game end?
|
Interesting. The VC are: “ Provided the Germans have not amassed >= 8 CVP (which would result in an immediate German Victory), the Americans win at Game End if there is no Good Order German MMC in any hex with a coordinate numbered ≥ 5.”
So, let’s say that by the last turn, the Germans have 6 CVP, 4 of which are prisoners (so they would get 4 more CVP for them at game end). ?At Game End, the Americans have satisfied their own VC. Who wins? i.e. does the German VC include the game end “bump” for the prisoners? The way the German VC is worded, it’s not entirely clear.
- Len
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 20, 2025, at 2:11?PM, Carl N. via groups.io <carlhnogueira@...> wrote:
? Prisoners count double at game end unless an SSR to the contrary is present. Carl On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 2:06 PM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury= [email protected]> wrote: In Not Digging Potatoes, there is a CVP cap for the Americans.? Do prisoners count double immediately should they be captured only at game end?
|
Prisoners count double at game end unless an SSR to the contrary is present. Carl
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 2:06 PM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury= [email protected]> wrote: In Not Digging Potatoes, there is a CVP cap for the Americans.? Do prisoners count double immediately should they be captured only at game end?
|
In Not Digging Potatoes, there is a CVP cap for the Americans.? Do prisoners count double immediately should they be captured only at game end?
|
|
|
Re: Initial Skirmish question
Agreed Chuck, it can use AP with a TK # 7.
Tom On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:49?AM Chuck Tewksbury via <chuck.tewksbury= [email protected]> wrote:
In YASL2 initial skirmish does the French sw INF gun shoot AP? I can’t see why not
|
Initial Skirmish question
In YASL2 initial skirmish does the French sw INF gun shoot AP? I can’t see why not
|
Re: Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Ok.? I killed his entire registration ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carl N. via
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 7:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [yasl] Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter ? I have been able to confirm with Robert that this year he is having to withdraw from the?tournament in general. ? It doesn't look like Robert withdrew on the website...
I'm assuming "Paul" is Paul Anderson - the only Paul we have signed up for the tourney?? I'll add him into the mini.? Let me know if this is incorrect and it is a different Paul (e.g. one who just sent a check in rather than using the website).
Thanks,
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph Gochinski via
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 6:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [yasl] Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
Paul
It is yours
Email? me off list when you can
Joe
> On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:50?PM, Comcast via <Voyager77=[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ?Hi Joe
> I’ll take it if still open
> Thx
>
> Paul
>> On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:36 PM, Joseph Gochinski via <jgochinski=[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> ?Gentlemen
>>
>> Robert Hammond has to? withdrawal
>> From the Friday mini tourney.
>>
>> This of course means there is an opening
>>
>> Email here to claim the spot.
>>
>> I will send along the scenarios and tourney info to you..
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Re: Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
Ok.? I killed his entire registration ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carl N. via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 7:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [yasl] Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter ? I have been able to confirm with Robert that this year he is having to withdraw from the?tournament in general. ? It doesn't look like Robert withdrew on the website...
I'm assuming "Paul" is Paul Anderson - the only Paul we have signed up for the tourney?? I'll add him into the mini.? Let me know if this is incorrect and it is a different Paul (e.g. one who just sent a check in rather than using the website).
Thanks,
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph Gochinski via
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 6:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [yasl] Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
Paul
It is yours
Email? me off list when you can
Joe
> On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:50?PM, Comcast via <Voyager77=[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ?Hi Joe
> I’ll take it if still open
> Thx
>
> Paul
>> On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:36 PM, Joseph Gochinski via <jgochinski=[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> ?Gentlemen
>>
>> Robert Hammond has to? withdrawal
>> From the Friday mini tourney.
>>
>> This of course means there is an opening
>>
>> Email here to claim the spot.
>>
>> I will send along the scenarios and tourney info to you..
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Re: Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
Bruce
It is Paul A
Thanks
Joe
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 13, 2025, at 7:01?PM, Bruce Carson <bcarson@...> wrote:
?It doesn't look like Robert withdrew on the website...
I'm assuming "Paul" is Paul Anderson - the only Paul we have signed up for the tourney? I'll add him into the mini. Let me know if this is incorrect and it is a different Paul (e.g. one who just sent a check in rather than using the website).
Thanks,
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph Gochinski via groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 6:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [yasl] Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
Paul
It is yours
Email me off list when you can
Joe
On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:50?PM, Comcast via groups.io <Voyager77@...> wrote:
?Hi Joe
I’ll take it if still open
Thx
Paul
On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:36 PM, Joseph Gochinski via groups.io <jgochinski@...> wrote: ?Gentlemen
Robert Hammond has to withdrawal
From the Friday mini tourney.
This of course means there is an opening
Email here to claim the spot.
I will send along the scenarios and tourney info to you..
Thanks
Joe
|
Re: Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
I have been able to confirm with Robert that this year he is having to withdraw from the?tournament in general. Thanks, Carl
It doesn't look like Robert withdrew on the website...
I'm assuming "Paul" is Paul Anderson - the only Paul we have signed up for the tourney?? I'll add him into the mini.? Let me know if this is incorrect and it is a different Paul (e.g. one who just sent a check in rather than using the website).
Thanks,
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph Gochinski via
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 6:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [yasl] Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
Paul
It is yours
Email? me off list when you can
Joe
> On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:50?PM, Comcast via <Voyager77=[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ?Hi Joe
> I’ll take it if still open
> Thx
>
> Paul
>> On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:36 PM, Joseph Gochinski via <jgochinski=[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> ?Gentlemen
>>
>> Robert Hammond has to? withdrawal
>> From the Friday mini tourney.
>>
>> This of course means there is an opening
>>
>> Email here to claim the spot.
>>
>> I will send along the scenarios and tourney info to you..
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Re: Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
It doesn't look like Robert withdrew on the website...
I'm assuming "Paul" is Paul Anderson - the only Paul we have signed up for the tourney? I'll add him into the mini. Let me know if this is incorrect and it is a different Paul (e.g. one who just sent a check in rather than using the website).
Thanks,
Bruce
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph Gochinski via groups.io Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 6:06 PM To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [yasl] Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter Paul It is yours Email me off list when you can Joe On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:50?PM, Comcast via groups.io <Voyager77@...> wrote:
?Hi Joe
I’ll take it if still open
Thx
Paul
On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:36 PM, Joseph Gochinski via groups.io <jgochinski@...> wrote:
?Gentlemen
Robert Hammond has to withdrawal
From the Friday mini tourney.
This of course means there is an opening
Email here to claim the spot.
I will send along the scenarios and tourney info to you..
Thanks
Joe
|
Re: Opening in the Friday mini fur the nor’easter
Paul
It is yours
Email me off list when you can
Joe
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:50?PM, Comcast via groups.io <Voyager77@...> wrote:
?Hi Joe
I’ll take it if still open
Thx
Paul
On Feb 12, 2025, at 4:36 PM, Joseph Gochinski via groups.io <jgochinski@...> wrote:
?Gentlemen
Robert Hammond has to withdrawal
From the Friday mini tourney.
This of course means there is an opening
Email here to claim the spot.
I will send along the scenarios and tourney info to you..
Thanks
Joe
|
Len Kay
Bruce Carson