开云体育Hey Michael and everyone, I am indeed part of the group and thanks for chiming me in :)As Michael stated, the resonance seems to “collapse” when you adjust too far, but iirc I noticed if you raise the brilliance paddle up to top then back to centre you can “regain” the level and continue from where you had it collapse, allowing it to go further up in p-p voltage. ?Hope that makes sense! ? The one observation I noticed doing it this way however is the relationship of this calibration to the brilliance paddle movement. For example once calibrated to a higher p-p voltage, raising the paddle from middle to top then back to middle keeps the maximum resonance centred—however lowering the paddle to bottom and back to middle the balance point becomes offset and collapsed(the maximum slightly higher than the detent point). ?It makes me think that what we are actually trying to achieve here with this calibration is a bipolar balance so moving the paddle to either extreme and back to the detent we can keep the maximum level at the detent position if that makes sense. ?Not sure what p-p voltage that would be in certain CS80’s, maybe closer to the CS60 values as Michael was experimenting with, but just my own theory. Anyway… Someone out there must be holding some secret Yamaha documents about this calibration between revisions though, I find it too strange how this particular calibration was so off in the CS80 I had here. Greg C.
|
