开云体育

thx again for your advise, Karl ... That worked for me too,- even I cleaned em in addition. I now saved the replacement encoders in my tool box and saved time because the soldering job was obsolete.

Okay,? I see now. Please let us know how that turns out. Karl ________________________________ To: "xpantastic@..." <xpantastic@...> Sent: Sun, April 14, 2013 5:26:12 PM

the issue we're referring to here has to do with new encoders, not the originals. The replacement kit that Syntaur sells uses a pot that doesn't meet the exact specs of the originals. Hence the issue.

Have you changed your encoders already? The reason I ask, ?This is how my encoders were behaving for awhile. (multiple clicks per Inc/Dec) ? Eventually? this got worse, so I pulled out my

I hear ya. And I can see where it would be useful depending on your style of programming. I'm just different when it comes to programming synths. I've been programming for over 20+ years and have come

it was called iControlMIDI and it wasn't as bad as it looked. Actually very functional for those synths that are more difficult to edit. I use it for my SQ-80m (prototype SQ-80 rack in an ESQm casing)

Is a OSX or Ipad version in development ?

I don't think so mate. I did see an iPad editor for the Matrix and Xpander on ebay but it looked terrible. It was kinda generic and there were other synth editors by the seller that looked the same.

too bad osx version is not available-i'm not going to use windows on mac software personally ________________________________ To: xpantastic@... Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 2:09 PM

that may be, but I don't need this enough to spend $40 or $50 (can't remember) for Parallels, just for this one application.

Anyone using Xplorer on OSX yet btw per below btw ? http://xplorer.programmer.free.fr/bb/viewtopic.php?id=10

Yes I use Xplorer with OSX using Windows via Parallels. Works great… with "coherence mode" switched on you would never know you were running Windows and it would look like a regular OSX app for the

I have a thread on that forum about trying to get xplorer to work with vmware fusion. I was not successful, and I don't think that there is yet a solution.

Xplorer has the advantage of showing you every parameter and modulation mapping at a glance which is why I really love it… also it works both ways… you can edit on the computer and also the synth

yup, its two clicks for me as well, and it doesnt always happen, just seems random. Xplorer looks cool, but I use hardware synths because I like using the different "hands-on" interface that each

Look forward to hearing about that Omar. Its more like 2 clicks per parameter change on mine now I just checked it out… it works great though and the encoders feel real nice on mine. Less noisy for

its all matter of choice. this isnt a debate about what makes your Xpander keep value, nor is a new part a compromise over an original as long as it meets the same specs. if you want to clean your

Dont know ... If you have to turn the rotarys 3 times more for the same value change now,- which is exactly the case when 3 clicks produce a value change of + /- 1 only,- they will be worn out again

Yeah seems a shame to me as well… Still its better than them not working at all I suppose.

>>> Am 14.04.2013 07:02, schrieb orangefunk: good to know because I have em bookmarked for the case mine stop working correctly in future and after I cleaned the original ones. This is not good IMO