Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
I added to discussion? - https://github.com/gdyuldin/x6100_gui/discussions/20#discussioncomment-11504870
--
Georgy // R2RFE
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
Well, must repeat wifi config after each next SD firmware upgrade. Georgy, maybe add Backup button to webserver page. It would do sth like:
tar -czf /mnt/x6100_r1cbu_private.tgz /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/ /root/.ssh/
After SD upgrage I will copy created .tgz to DATA part. and next boot will merge my private settings into new system.
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
It's not supported by LVGL default keyboard layout ()
As a workaround for wifi connection you can:
* turn on wifi on the radio
* connect to radio with USB cable and PuTTY
* launch `nmtui-connect` and connect to WIFI network. Your password and connection parameters will be saved within system, so later radio will be able to connect to this network without password prompt.
--
Georgy // R2RFE
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
And where is the ^ symbol on the keyboard?"
|
Re: log file R1BCU ft8 firmware
Georgy,? Mea Culpa, I had the wrong memory card in the radio, wasn't running ver 28...all good now webserver works great.
?
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
yes that was the problem.? I had to setup a guest wifi as that was the only one my router allowed to remove the client isolation. after connecting to guest its working great.? On netgear router its called "allow guests to see each other and access my local network".? Thank you!
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 06:04 PM, greencane372 wrote:
I also tried from another PC and same result.
Hmm... I'm not sure, perhaps your using something like "client isolation". This might block connecting from PC to radio.
Also, some routers have a possibility to execute ping from web interface. You can also check, that ping from router to radio is successful.
--
Georgy // R2RFE
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
Some (many?) routers have Wireless feature called Isolation or Client Separation. If enabled, WiFi clients can "talk" ONLY to Access Point (internet) and all wired devices but NOT between each other - PC or laptop connected to such AP has no way to X6100 if both of them use WiFi. Switching one of them (X6100 or PC/laptop) to ETH, to other AP on local net or disable Isolation might help in that case.
|
Re: log file R1BCU ft8 firmware
There might be another possibility. Some (many?) routers have Wireless feature called Isolation or Client Separation. If enabled, WiFi clients can "talk" ONLY to Access Point (internet) and NOT between each other - PC or laptop connected to such AP has no way to X6100. Switching PC/laptop to ETH, other AP on local net or disable Isolation might help.
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
I had to reinstall, then used angry ip to find it. But it has been working fine since.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 9:00?AM greencane372 via <greencane372= [email protected]> wrote: Hello, just tried this firmware its amazing!!!? ?FT8 in the same radio box is awesome.? I am having no luck getting the webserver access.? I am on my home wifi and tried both and directly to the IP assigned by my router.? Are there any settings on the device to enable this that I am missing?? I am 1 day into using this alternative firmware so getting used to it.
thank you, KD2UWR
|
Re: Patched BASE firmware with changed TX audio filter low cutoff frequency
#firmware
Sean,
Any SDR radio like the Hermes Lite 2, Square SDR or Radioberry has the ESSB capability and extra things like Pure Signal and CESSB depending on the PC program.
Gary
W9TD
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
.6 is my PC.
I also tried from another PC and same result.
below is the output of that command.
C:\Users\mverd>arp -a
Interface: 169.254.171.3 --- 0xd
? Internet Address ? ? ?Physical Address ? ? ?Type
? 169.254.255.255 ? ? ? ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff ? ? static
? 224.0.0.22 ? ? ? ? ? ?01-00-5e-00-00-16 ? ? static
? 224.0.0.251 ? ? ? ? ? 01-00-5e-00-00-fb ? ? static
? 224.0.0.252 ? ? ? ? ? 01-00-5e-00-00-fc ? ? static
? 239.255.255.250 ? ? ? 01-00-5e-7f-ff-fa ? ? static
? 255.255.255.255 ? ? ? ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff ? ? static
Interface: 192.168.1.6 --- 0xe
? Internet Address ? ? ?Physical Address ? ? ?Type
? 192.168.1.1 ? ? ? ? ? 80-cc-9c-2f-d5-ca ? ? dynamic
? 192.168.1.10 ? ? ? ? ?d8-3a-dd-36-1a-59 ? ? dynamic
? 192.168.1.11 ? ? ? ? ?d8-3a-dd-36-1a-59 ? ? dynamic
? 192.168.1.12 ? ? ? ? ?00-90-a9-3d-b7-46 ? ? dynamic
? 192.168.1.47 ? ? ? ? ?7c-d9-5c-7a-a2-03 ? ? dynamic
? 192.168.1.255 ? ? ? ? ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff ? ? static
? 224.0.0.22 ? ? ? ? ? ?01-00-5e-00-00-16 ? ? static
? 224.0.0.251 ? ? ? ? ? 01-00-5e-00-00-fb ? ? static
? 224.0.0.252 ? ? ? ? ? 01-00-5e-00-00-fc ? ? static
? 239.255.255.250 ? ? ? 01-00-5e-7f-ff-fa ? ? static
? 255.255.255.255 ? ? ? ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff ? ? static
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
Is 192.168.1.6 is address of your router or it's IP of your PC?
Could you show `arp -a` output?
Could you try from another device (phone/tablet)?
--
Georgy // R2RFE
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
Thank you Georgy for replying.? maybe it is something with my router.? I can see it has a valid IP address on both my router and on the x6100 (192.168.1.50).? The x6100 even says the NPT time is synced on boot and status = connected on the wifi screen.? but when I ping from my PC on the same wifi network I get:
?
C:\Users\mverd>ping 192.168.1.50
Pinging 192.168.1.50 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.6: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.6: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.6: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.6: Destination host unreachable.
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.50:
? ? Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
Webserver should be available all the time, there is no setting to turn it off. Could you check ping to your radio IP?
--
Georgy // R2RFE
|
Re: X6100 alternative firmware v0.28.0
Hello, just tried this firmware its amazing!!!? ?FT8 in the same radio box is awesome.? I am having no luck getting the webserver access.? I am on my home wifi and tried both and directly to the IP assigned by my router.? Are there any settings on the device to enable this that I am missing?? I am 1 day into using this alternative firmware so getting used to it.
thank you, KD2UWR
|
Re: Patched BASE firmware with changed TX audio filter low cutoff frequency
#firmware
I think eSSB is ok if used responsibly when bands are quiet and a little more audio clarity can help with long DX contacts. I would certainly never use it on 60 Meters as FCC rules are specific on that one. I would neither go above 4Khz as we are indeed abusing the limits of FCC rule 97.307(a).
Anything above 4KHz is wasted energy and more prone to interfere with adjacent channels.
I was considering the Yaesu FTDX-10 as this has the full 4KHz bandwidth, But $1,599.95 is a little pricy.
|
Re: Patched BASE firmware with changed TX audio filter low cutoff frequency
#firmware
Sean,
Here in the US, ESSB is not actually allowed as FCC rule 97.307(a) states: "No amateur station transmission shall occupy more bandwidth than necessary for the information rate and emission type being transmitted, in accordance with good amateur practice." And later on in 97.307 in table 1 for 60meters, the USB emission code is 2K80J3E where the 2K8 stands for 2.8KHz bandwidth. Nevertheless, no one will probably get a fine for using ESSB.
Gary
W9TD
|
Re: Patched BASE firmware with changed TX audio filter low cutoff frequency
#firmware
Georgy,
I plan to put together a simple proof of concept here on my X6100, and then put the code on GitHub.
I just ordered one of those USB->Ethernet adapters, because so far I have only connected via the serial interface. I think that for those tests it would be useful to have multiple ssh sessions open at the same time.
?
Franco
|
Re: Patched BASE firmware with changed TX audio filter low cutoff frequency
#firmware
Would be nice to still keep the 160Hz for voice and 3500 would improve both voice and FT8. Maybe a bandwidth of 160 to 3500 would be a good compromise?
|
W9DHI, Gregg Lengling
Gary