Re: Is there an azimuth where the moon will not be?
XEphem can give you azimuth and elevation for the moon at any time and create a list of positions for intervals of your choosing easily. But to answer your initial question, just like the sun, the
By
randolf0klein@...
·
#3942
·
|
Is there an azimuth where the moon will not be?
Hi,
I have not downloaded XEphem, but will do. I'm a Unix/Linux fan - in fact I
still use Solaris as part of my business, but intend phasing that out, as
Oracle have killed off Solaris. I run Ubuntu
By
David Kirkby
·
#3941
·
|
Re: mouse zoom
I guess separate code is needed to enable mouse-zoom in the other solar system screens? Mercury, Venus, Mars, &c.
By
Bernie Walp
·
#3940
·
|
Re: mouse zoom
Hi, Brandon:
Thanks for your additions to skyviewmenu.c ! Love that zoom.
Bernie
NASA/IRTF telescope opr.
By
Bernie Walp
·
#3939
·
|
Re: Mars model ; uranus model
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 2:03 PM Elwood Downey <elwood.downey@...>
wrote:
They are complementary, not redundant. gsc goes to about visual magnitude
> 15. That cutoff was made, in part, so it
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3938
·
|
Re: New patches for XEphem
wrote:
I'll be careful when doing commits from mailing list patches to include the
patch name in the commit message, and also a mention of whether the patch
was contested or discussed ¡ª that should
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3937
·
|
Re: New patches for XEphem
Hi
W dniu 06.10.2021 o?03:00, Lutz M?ndle pisze:
This modification gives us gsc 2.4.2. - not gsc 2.3 (see http://gsss.stsci.edu/webservices/GSC2/WebForm.aspx)
In gsc2.4.2 last field in data is
By
?ukasz 'e2rd' Sanocki
·
#3936
·
|
Re: New patches for XEphem
Am Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021, 12:51:53 CEST schrieb Brandon Rhodes:
I just thought "let's do this properly".
this is exactly where a pull request would be better than just some patch, to
document
By
Mathias Homann
·
#3935
·
|
Re: New patches for XEphem
Wow! Thank you for all of these patches, Lutz. I think I should be able to
apply them and commit each of them by hand for you with something like:
git commit --author='Lutz M?ndle
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3934
·
|
Re: New patches for XEphem
Please submit those as pull requests on github.
separate pull requests if possible.
Cheers
MH
Am Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021, 03:00:27 CEST schrieb Lutz M?ndle:
By
Mathias Homann
·
#3933
·
|
New patches for XEphem
Hi,
here comes some patches to restore and extend functionality of XEphem.
All patches are created against the version 4.1.0 and can applied with
patch -p5 < <path to patchfile>/<patchfile>
from
By
Lutz M?ndle
·
#3932
·
|
Re: SOLVED: Re: [xephem] 4.1.0 make problem
Thanks for letting us know that the build succeeded! I've updated the
INSTALL file to mention that library:
https://github.com/XEphem/XEphem/commit/b421f91a9b785f9f157f8eca5b8bd6ff5efd4832
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3931
·
|
Re: 4.1.0 make problem
wrote:
Oh, you¡¯ve already solved it! Good. My email reader, alas, is bad at
threading (it's Gmail) and so the difference in title tossed your happy
"SOLVED" email over into a little thread of its
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3930
·
|
Re: 4.1.0 make problem
Alas, I don't have Linux Mint! But I searched Google for:
"linux mint" "openssl/ssl.h: No such file or directory"
¡ª since I often find the combination of operating system and (exact, hence
the
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3929
·
|
Re: SOLVED: Re: [xephem] 4.1.0 make problem
... oh yes, I made a mistake, it is *libssl-dev* (also in ubuntu) and not openssl-dev.
Sorry and best regards,
Martin
By
Martin Federspiel
·
#3928
·
|
SOLVED: Re: [xephem] 4.1.0 make problem
Yes! libssl-dev did the trick. Thank you, Rick,
Bernie
By
Bernie Walp
·
#3927
·
|
Re: 4.1.0 make problem
Thanks, Martin:
The operating system says openssl is "built in" but since I am seeing those make errors with XEphem 4.1.0, I looked in the apt repositories for openssl-dev, and saw 13 choices. This
By
Bernie Walp
·
#3926
·
|
Re: 4.1.0 make problem
I had the same issue, and I did as Martin mentions¡ I installed libssl-dev and then 4.10 built successfully. I¡¯m on Arch, but I think the library is the same for Mint.
Clear skies!
Rick
By
Rick Towns
·
#3925
·
|
Re: 4.1.0 make problem
Hi Bernie,
first, I had the same error on my Ubuntu Linux. Now openssl is included in the XEphem code to enable downloads via the https protocol, a good thing! You have to install the proper openssl
By
Martin Federspiel
·
#3924
·
|
4.1.0 make problem
Hi Brandon or anyone:
I am stumped by my initial attempt to install 4.1.0 on Linux Mint. It got the make error below, which confuses me because the 4.0.2 make runs fine. Can you give me any advice?
By
Bernie Walp
·
#3923
·
|