Re: SOHO images and XEphem
Thank you! ?I've done what you suggested and all is fine now. ?Unfortunately there is no maintainer for XEphem within the MacPorts community, so it looks like the latest version(s) won't get pushed
By
SpikeLightfoot
·
#3922
·
|
Re: SOHO images and XEphem
You are right in release 4.0.1 Brandon had not included ssh patches
in order
to integrate kindly the collaborative parts ...
The 4.1 actual official release is fully operative on soho,
By
Serge Montagnac
·
#3921
·
|
SOHO images and XEphem
I'm not sure what the latest state of XEphem is with respect to retrieving SOHO images. ?The images are currently available via https (e.g.
By
SpikeLightfoot
·
#3920
·
|
Re: XEphem in its natural environment
Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2021, 03:41:28 CEST schrieb Trane Francks:
The fedora rpm packages that I'm providing are available for PPC little endian
- I think all the longish computational stuff
By
Mathias Homann
·
#3919
·
|
Re: XEphem in its natural environment
No laughter from me. I always liked the classical UNIX and Linux desktop environments. For a time, I used TWM on Slackware, although I eventually settled on KDE. I always wanted to see a solid CDE
By
Trane Francks
·
#3918
·
|
XEphem in its natural environment
I just wanted to thank Elwood (yet again!) for building such an awesome program, and also all the people working on the github version.
I run Arch Linux and I use TWM as my X Window manager. I just
By
Rick Towns
·
#3917
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
My attempt to install from AUR (Arch User Repository) on Manjaro
GNU/Linux was unsuccessful. This is unusual. I tried on a laptop and a
desktop, both failed. I will try to compile by hand, before
By
Alan Davis
·
#3916
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
On 21/09/2021 12:22, Brandon Rhodes
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:46 PM Serge Montagnac
<obs.psr@...>
wrote:
By
Serge Montagnac
·
#3915
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
Something ate my answer:
It's not Uranus view - this is Sky View with increased magnitute limit to about 18 mag
--
?ukasz Sanocki
By
?ukasz 'e2rd' Sanocki
·
#3914
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
This is correct, but full url is someting like in line 31:
http://gsss.stsci.edu/webservices/vo/ConeSearch.aspx?RA=352.702&DEC=-4.4221&SR=0.2&FORMAT=CSV&CAT=GSC23
RA is RA in degrees :)
DEC is DEC
By
?ukasz 'e2rd' Sanocki
·
#3913
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
--
?ukasz Sanocki
AP-Media
By
?ukasz 'e2rd' Sanocki
·
#3912
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
wrote:
Am I correct that this change would switch the project to requiring GNU
Make, since I don't think "ifeq" is compatible with all "make"
implementations?
Is everyone happy with that change? If
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3911
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 5:59 PM ?ukasz 'e2rd' Sanocki <lukasz@...>
wrote:
I needed some faint-star catalog (~20mag), so I played about gsc 2.3 and
> found post by Piero Bradley about
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3910
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
Thank you for the updated Uranus file, Serge! Having applied your patch to
the "main" branch in the repository, I now see several more moons of Uranus
in the window. (And I'm curious to learn how
By
Brandon Rhodes
·
#3909
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
Good evening,
The structure of this file is magic to me but it works, thanks! :)
I needed some faint-star catalog (~20mag), so I played about gsc 2.3 and found post by Piero Bradley about
By
?ukasz 'e2rd' Sanocki
·
#3908
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
Wonderful, thank you everybody.
By
Bernie Walp
·
#3907
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
Thanks Mathias ... read my message to the list and upgrade the
uranus.2040 data file.
Thanks for coop,
Serge
By
Serge Montagnac
·
#3906
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
Good evening ?ukasz, ... and Brandon ?
I didn't not work to much to find the bloody thing ... I suspected
the line 1 of uranus.2040 again ...
( the 7th field
By
Serge Montagnac
·
#3905
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
rpm packages for openSUSE Leap 15.2, 15.3 and Tumbleweed and for Fedora 32, 33
and rawhide have been built successfully and can be found on
By
Mathias Homann
·
#3904
·
|
Re: XEphem 4.1.0
Hi ?ukasz,
I agree with you an I'll contact Valery Lainey for closer control of
the data polynomes (we had some troubles with fortran tables
formating ...)
We play with high
By
Serge Montagnac
·
#3903
·
|