Hi ?ukasz,
I agree with you an I'll contact Valery Lainey for closer control of
the data polynomes (we had some troubles with fortran tables
formating ...)
We play with high precision ephemerids so ... ?
... give us 3 or 4 days.
Best regards,
Serge.
On 19/09/2021 23:03, ?ukasz 'e2rd'
Sanocki wrote:
Hello
I think there is serious bug in Uranus moons data (code?). While
Titania and Oberon positions seems to be accurate, then other 3
moons are in random place - especially Miranda is faar away from
planet...
Look at attachement screenshot and photo taken by me at 14.09.2021
22:40 UT. For example stellarium shows correct data.
btw, I've updated debian package for Ubuntu/Debian
W dniu 14.09.2021 o?14:44, Martin Federspiel pisze:
Hi to everyone, who contributed to version
4.1.0, and a huge thank you! That updates XEphem significantly.
The quality of the updated positions of the Galilean moons can
be checked e.g. by comparing Christopher Go's series of images
of a triple transit of Callisto, Ganymede, and Europa on Aug
15th, 2021 (see
) with XEphem.
During the transit there was also an occultation of Europa by
Ganymede and a partial eclipse of Europa by Ganymede a few
minutes later. All that is well reproduced by XEphem 4.1.0,
whereas earlier versions didn't get the mutual events well.
Since openssl support is now included in 4.1.0, I had to install
libssl-dev on my Ubuntu 20.04 system to get 4.1.0 compiled.
Thanks again and best regards,
Martin Federspiel
--
Serge Montagnac + GPG Key 0xDF083D7B +
Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate.