On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 2:27 PM Brandon Rhodes via <brandon=[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 2:06 PM Elwood Downey <elwood.downey@...> wrote:
1. I confirm your report using XEphem 4.0.1 but I can also report the?jumping does NOT happen with my legacy 3.7.6 so?SOMEBODY BROKE SOMETHING.
Back in July, someone offered to update the Pluto orbital elements ¡ Here's the code update they suggested:
I have just tested and can confirm that the above-linked commit is the one that introduced the discontinuity. Apparently this new elliptical orbit for Pluto does not provide a smooth join with the ¡°chap95_pluto¡± Pluto positions that "planpos()" uses over the time period from?CHAP_BEGIN to?CHAP_END which, it appears, are the dates?1689/3/19 through?2247/10/1.
I'm open to ideas about the best way to resolve this. Should we revert the improvement and go back to our old Pluto ellipse?