On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 07:21 AM, Skip Hansen wrote:
I feel much better about this version as we don't lose any
functionality and I2C opens new possibilities.
Feedback please!
Sorry for the crickets from me. I've been down so many rabbit holes today I might have to change my name to Alice. I've been on the hunt thru my digital media swamp. I had to investigate everything I didnt recognize....Yup lots of rabbit holes.
So..the revision, I2C is good. No extra CS lines needed for multible devices like SPI.
IIRC I2C used to be 400khz max, may be more now, but that should handle any expansion one would want.
Doug Hall protocol needs discrete sync lines even using I2C?
The (future) wireless/BT link will have to be built out on the SB9600 command set....or?
