For what it's worth, I've just been trying to figure out why it
*didn't* work the last time – previously I had
?x25 win 7
?x25 wout 7
?x25 ips 1024
?x25 ops 1024
?x25 subscribe packetsize permit 128 1024
?x25 subscribe windowsize permit 2 15
for interop with Hans' SunLink (which refuses calls otherwise as
it isn't configured to accept anything above 7), but right now
I've reverted to the "original"
?x25 win 15
?x25 wout 15
?x25 ips 1024
?x25 ops 1024
? ! no 'x25 subscribe packetsize'
? ! no 'x25 subscribe windowsize'
It's really not clear to me how the facility negotiation works...
On 2023-12-16 21:40, Christopher Collet
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
That did the trick. Thanks! I just had to remove
the X25 TELEBAHN profile and now it works fine
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at
5:30?PM Phillip Heller via <pheller=
[email protected]>
wrote:
I can check my Cisco config tomorrow morning,
but I recall running into something similar.? Try to adjust
your profile to window size of 2 (both directions) and
modulo 8, or disassociate the profile entirely.
Also, Wireshark has a comprehensive dissector for XOT,
so it may prove helpful in troubleshooting and comparing
with what xotpad negotiates.
?
I configured my Cisco as per the
sample?configuration on the x25 website but it seems
that I'm still missing something. Looks like the
error is "
?XOT Call Confirm packet, Bad value for facility,
Window size is not within permitted range." I'm able
to connect to 471041 just fine from xotpad
Router#pad 471041
Trying 471041...
% Connection refused by remote host
Router#
*Dec 15 20:32:23.522: [193.219.181.219,1998/,25515]:
XOT O P2 Call (18) 128 lci 1
*Dec 15 20:32:23.522: ? From (0): ?To (6):
471041
*Dec 15 20:32:23.522: ? Facilities: (6)
*Dec 15 20:32:23.522: ? ? Packet sizes: 1024
1024
*Dec 15 20:32:23.522: ? ? Window sizes: 15 15
*Dec 15 20:32:23.522: ? Call User Data (4):
0x01000000 (pad)
*Dec 15 20:32:23.682: [193.219.181.219,1998/,25515]:
XOT I P2 Call Confirm (11) 128 lci 1
*Dec 15 20:32:23.682: ? From (0): ?To (0):
*Dec 15 20:32:23.682: ? Facilities: (6)
*Dec 15 20:32:23.682: ? ? Packet sizes: 1024
1024
*Dec 15 20:32:23.686: ? ? Window sizes: 15 15
*Dec 15 20:32:23.686: XOT Call Confirm packet,
Bad value for facility, Window size is not
within permitted range
*Dec 15 20:32:23.686: [193.219.181.219,1998/,25515]:
XOT O P2 Clear (5) 128 lci 1
*Dec 15 20:32:23.686: ? Cause 3, Diag 66
(Invalid facility request/Facility parameter not
allowed)
*Dec 15 20:32:23.686: [193.219.181.219,1998/,25515]:
XOT I P6 Data (5) Q 128 lci 1 PS 0 PR 0
*Dec 15 20:32:23.690: [193.219.181.219,1998/,25515]:
XOT I P6 Data (107) 128 lci 1 PS 1 PR 0
*Dec 15 20:32:23.838: [193.219.181.219,1998/,25515]:
XOT I P6 Clear Confirm (3) 128 lci 1
On Wed, Dec 13,
2023 at 12:27?PM Christopher Collet via
<ccolletpdp11=
[email protected]>
wrote:
It doesn't look like the
Sparcstation 1 has jumpers on the motherboard to
set the serial ports to RS423... but I also have
a Sparcstation 4 and a 10 so I guess I'll just
use one of those instead. Thanks!
On Tue, Dec
12, 2023 at 8:12?PM Dave Brown <
dave@...>
wrote:
Assuming the SparcStation 1 supports
RS530 differential serial.? RS530 defines
the cable, and it uses EIA/RS-423 electrical
signaling.
Some Sparc serial ports can be set to
RS423. I think you might get lucky with
the SparcStation 1; and further assuming
it’s similar to the 4 or 5; they could. ?
Hello everyone,
I'd like to connect my
old Sparcstation 1 to
Telebahn. I've got a Cisco
1841 with a WIC-2T, can I
use a?CAB-SS-530MT cable
to connect the WIC-2T
directly to the serial
port on the Sparcstation?
And then run Sunlink on
the Sparc to connect to
Telebahn??
Btw my dad worked for
Telenet back in the 80's
and when I told him about
this project, he said "why
would anybody want to do
that?"??
