my $0.02 says it is needlessly complex. So much of this Willys stuff
overlaps. Besides, I am interested in it all.
Ron, IA
43GPW, 51M38
missed out on the CJ2A I was supposed to look at
William T Wilson wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: William T Wilson <fluffy@...>
I was just thinking; another mailing list I'm on that deals with several
different "flavors" of vehicle under the same general topic encourages
their users to put in the subject line, which model they are referring to.
Would it be a good idea if we started doing the same thing here? For
example, they have [1], [2], [3] (for the three different "generations")
as well as [misc] and [none] - for things related but not to a particular
model, and things generally unrelated. [humor] is also in use; hopefully
self explanatory. :}
What this does is it gives people the opportunity to ignore messages that
they know aren't interesting to them. On the other hand, that's a pretty
high volume list; maybe we don't need a scheme like that here.
We could have [2a] [3a] [5] [PU] [DJ] [FC] and [W], for example.
Would this be of value, or just needlessly complex?
