Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- W4dccqa
- Messages
Search
Re: Readback CV's
Allan,
The thing that got me was: When I hooked up the decoder and MP15 motor to the program track and also the Atlas motor, pressed DISP to read the default address, both motors turned but only the Atlas motor gave a readback for the address. So, I programmed the decoder with the Atlas motor. No problem. The advice to put a resistor across the motor won't work in the loco because there is no room even to put it in temporarily. The motor leads are buried in the frame and inaccessable so that the wiring has to be done to the motor and then the motor put in the frame. At any rate, since both motors turned, that's what lead me to measure resistance on the motors with the MP15 motor measurimg a lot less, so my thought that it didn't have enough resistance to be read and give readback. Sure would like to know how many ohms the command station needs to read to give readback but it's not important since another way to program the decoder is available. Mike |
Re: Difficulting reading back CV's in N-scale locomotives
wirefordcc
They didn't say a whole lot, did they?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Their phrase "the decoder must see a load" is partially correct. Since the decoder is connected to the motor, you can say that the decoder sees the motor. But the decoder doesn't do anything with this. It merely causes a load to be seen by your command station. Your command station is what registers the presence of the motor. I do agree that if the decoder works with another motor, the decoder is working correctly. Their advice about connecting a resistor across the motor is also valid. It would have been nice if they suggested a value. I'd start with 100 ohms and work down to say 20 ohms if need be. Since you are talking N-scale, you probably don't have room inside the locomotive to leave the resistor. Use AT LEAST 1/2W resistor. Don't leave it attached, it will smoke. There was something else I intended to say earlier, but forgot. There are only 2 sets of CVs you need to program in the program mode. 1. The address CVs (either CV 01 for short addresses or CV 17 & 18 for long addresses) and 2. the configuration CV 29. Everything else you can program on the main in Ops mode, which does not try to read back CVs. You won't be able to read CVs back in Ops mode, but you also won't get noPG or noID in this mode. Allan Mike,Digitrax |
Re: Difficulting reading back CV's in N-scale locomotives
--- In WiringForDCC@..., "wirefordcc"
<wire4dcc_admin@c...> wrote: Mike,Digitrax told you. They should have answered your questions.This was Digitrax's answer: To program, the decoder must see a load on the motor outputs. We are not aware of the programming problem with this particular motor with the DZ143. That the decoder programs with another type motor proves that the decoder is OK. You might add an additional resistor across the motor leads to increase the load and lave it in place for future programming changes or remove after programming. Hope this helps current drawn and reads that as an acknowledgement by the decoder. If thesends, and the decoder receives, a value equal to that of a particularCV, the decoder again briefly puts power to the motor to acknowledgeout what value is in the CV. Note that the decoder has no way to sendthe command station for a CV to be programmed. I frequently programattached. I get noPG indicating that the command station did not receive thestation didn't receive the acknowledgement. You can get around this byout what values need to go into them manually. With the originalfigure these values in their manuals. I don't know if they still do.to program CV 29 for long addresses. The new Digitrax DT400, and Iprogram the decoder prior to placing it in the locomotive if you can. Usea 20 ohm, 2 watt resistor for the motor. Use the resistor only foras a motor, you may smoke the resistor. (You don't actually need to& Z or connect a resistor to them temporarily.station to the acknowledgement pulse. I don't know exactly how to dothis, but I suspect it is just a resistor change. If you contactsend back your command station so that they may make the change for you.Thanks for the info. I knew something had to get feedback from the motor load in order to enable readback. I'll try putting a 4 digit address in the 1st loco which is all together now. The other loco is still waiting for the decoder to be installed and I have programmed the decoder with using a resistor as you suggested. |
Re: Difficulting reading back CV's in N-scale locomotives
wirefordcc
Mike,
You asked some very good questions. I'm curious as to what Digitrax told you. They should have answered your questions. Your problem is reading back the CVs that you are programming in your N-scale locomotives. You were wondering if there was something that could be changed so that a decoder could see a motor and read back the CV. Actually, the process doesn't exactly work that way. The decoder doesn't see the motor. When a decoder receives a programming signal or a request to read a CV, ALL the decoder does is briefly apply power to the motor to acknowledge that it has received a request from the command station. The motor acts as a load and draws current. That's all the decoder does. So there is nothing to change in your decoder. Your programming station, such as a Chief, sees the surge in current drawn and reads that as an acknowledgement by the decoder. If the Chief is programming, it displays 'Good.' When trying to read back a CV, the Chief sequentally sends the decoder every possible value for a given CV. When the Chief sends, and the decoder receives, a value equal to that of a particular CV, the decoder again briefly puts power to the motor to acknowledge this particular value. In this way the command station figures out what value is in the CV. Note that the decoder has no way to send the value of the CV. The command station has to "guess" it. It is not essential that an acknowledgement pulse be received by the command station for a CV to be programmed. I frequently program decoders before I put them in locomotives without a motor attached. I get noPG indicating that the command station did not receive the acknowledgment pulse. But the CV is programmed nonetheless. So how come you can't program a long address? A long address is programmed in two CV's - 17 & 18. The command station is probably programming one of them and then looking for the acknowledgement pulse. It never programs the second CV because the command station didn't receive the acknowledgement. You can get around this by programming CV 17 and 18 individually. You will need to figure out what values need to go into them manually. With the original Digitrax throttles, this is what you did, so they had how to figure these values in their manuals. I don't know if they still do. Don't forget, when programming a long address, you will also need to program CV 29 for long addresses. The new Digitrax DT400, and I believe DT300, throttles make programming CV 29 easy for you. Or again, you can do them manually. The above is how to program a CV without getting an acknowledgement. So what can you do to get the acknowledgement? Usually the motor will do the track. I admit I don't have experience on N and Z scale locomotives. I suggest that you program the decoder prior to placing it in the locomotive if you can. Use a 20 ohm, 2 watt resistor for the motor. Use the resistor only for programming. If you try to "run" the decoder using the resistor as a motor, you may smoke the resistor. (You don't actually need to use a 2 W resistor for programming. The 2 W is only in case you apply power and forget you have the resistor as a motor. It will start to smoke, but you probably won't destroy it before you can power down.) I suppose it would be difficult to test some drop in decoders in N & Z or connect a resistor to them temporarily. The final choice is to change the sensitivity of the command station to the acknowledgement pulse. I don't know exactly how to do this, but I suspect it is just a resistor change. If you contact Digitrax, they may be able to tell you how to do it or have you send back your command station so that they may make the change for you. I hope this gives you some insight into the reading CVs and programming decoders |
CONCOR N SCALE MP15
I put a DZ143 into the 1st MP15 I got and get 'NO PG' on every CV I
try to read. I have a Chief, DT400, and seperate program track. The loco runs on default address and the lights function normally. I can program a different 2 digit address into it - again no read back - and it performs OK. Cannot program a 4 digit address tho. Took the 2nd loco motor and hooked it up to decoder and program track with the same results on another DZ143, Lenz 0511 and TCS M1. Took an Atlas motor and hooked it up and can read all CV's. This MP15 motor has no visible brushes, just wires going into the motor similar to the 12v motors on some toy cars. Read ohms on the Atlas motor = 159 Read ohms on the MP15 motor = 69 Apparently the decoder can't 'see' a motor, thus no feedback on CV's. My question: If the decoder is set to see a certain amount of resistance (which appears to be the case from my test) and this value is too low, can it be changed in the decoder? If not, what is the solution to feed back? I've run the scenario by Digitrax also. Only thing I could figure, is to hook up an Atlas (or Kato) motor to decoder and to program track and program the decoder with the 4 digit address I want and then install it in the MP15 which I'll try next. Any electronical wizard thoughts? Mike |
Re: The Most Aggravating Layout
With my P2K GP7 units, this is indicative not of DCC problems, but of split
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
gears. Check some of the other lists (RPM-forum, Proto2000, etc.) for running commentaries. It seems the consensus is that the axle gears need to be replaced with an Athearn equivalent. The part number is listed in some of those threads. If you have problems finding same, report back to me and I'll search for those emails tonight. Second possibility - my opinion to date is that DCC is more dirt-on-wheels sensitive than DC was, so you may need to spend a few minutes cleaning wheels and track. Blair Smith. -----Original Message-----
From: WiringForDCC@... [mailto:WiringForDCC@...]On Behalf Of hazel6ton Sent: May 4, 2005 22:46 To: WiringForDCC@... Subject: [WiringForDCC] The Most Aggravating Layout I have a 4 by 8 layout which I recently converted to DCC. I am using a Digitrax Zephyr System. It initially ran well at first, but then I started getting sporadic response in my engines. I especially get this sporadic response around 18" radius turns and in my turnouts. My layout consists of an outside oval mainline interconnected to an inside oval at several locations by turnouts. I am running two Proto 2000 engines. GP7 equipped with a Soundtraxx decoder. Also a Alco S-1 with a Digitrax decoder. What is uncanny about all this is my engines ran well then just started to barely respond to DCC. My analog engine runs better than my decoder engines. Can anyone shed light on this problem? Yahoo! Groups Links |
The Most Aggravating Layout
hazel6ton
I have a 4 by 8 layout which I recently converted to DCC. I am using a
Digitrax Zephyr System. It initially ran well at first, but then I started getting sporadic response in my engines. I especially get this sporadic response around 18" radius turns and in my turnouts. My layout consists of an outside oval mainline interconnected to an inside oval at several locations by turnouts. I am running two Proto 2000 engines. GP7 equipped with a Soundtraxx decoder. Also a Alco S-1 with a Digitrax decoder. What is uncanny about all this is my engines ran well then just started to barely respond to DCC. My analog engine runs better than my decoder engines. Can anyone shed light on this problem? |
Re: infrared operation digitrax
wirefordcc
Peter,
I am running Digitrax wireless. I don't have any experience with the IR. However, I can say that in wireless everything works as it should. I can't think of any reasons why IR should be any different. Does everything work properly when you are plugged into Loconet directly? I think you asked another Digitrax questions a few days ago regarding running on analog address 00. Long term operation on address 00 can damage some motors. Also, if the locomotive is running on track where the booster is set to autoreverse, the locomotive may leap into reverse derailing your train. So use of address 00 is probably best used for testing out new locomotives but not day to day operation. Allan --- In WiringForDCC@..., "mhn_416" <mhn_416@y...> wrote: i have set up an infrared system on my lay out . my question toyou is when in the tetherless mode with analog train certain functions donot work such as reverse ,emergancy stop. have i done something wrongin my set up .dt 400 throttle, ir operation with 2 ur90's |
infrared operation digitrax
mhn_416
i have set up an infrared system on my lay out . my question to you is
when in the tetherless mode with analog train certain functions do not work such as reverse ,emergancy stop. have i done something wrong in my set up .dt 400 throttle, ir operation with 2 ur90's peter. |
Re: Fw: [Digitrax] DT 300
I have a similar configuration to yours ecxept all my throttles are
DT100R or DT100IR and one ancient DT100. I have noticed that when I turn off power (the UP3/5s are powered) that the throttles show PS or IDLE, not always the same display on each throttle. I investigated a bit and couldn't come up with an explanation. So I don't worry about it. It doesn't seem to affect battery life (I leave the batteries installed all the time). Dale. --- In WiringForDCC@..., "Jim McMahon" <hotrains@n...> wrote: Tried the Digitrax group maybe someone here has an answer.still itpowered My DT 400R &DT300R show PS my DT 300 no longer shows PS downused to it now shows IDLE. & spank it.That hasn't worked. |
Re: Digest Number 27
Ulrich Albrecht
Analog engines will run slower on DCC as the did with DC. It is in the
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
nature of the way how analog engines are handled: A part of the DCC signal is stretched either in the positve or ngative part (depending on the direction of travel) to create a positive or negative bias in the signal. This bias is what drives the engine, but it can never reach the full strength of a DC-signal. Ulrich On 2 May 2005 WiringForDCC@... wrote:
There is 1 message in this issue. |
Fw: [Digitrax] DT 300
Jim McMahon
Tried the Digitrax group maybe someone here has an answer.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "hotrains2001" <hotrains@...> To: <Digitrax@...> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 8:59 PM Subject: [Digitrax] DT 300 i have a DCS 100 DB150 PM42 BdL162 Ur91. |
anologe train runs very slow on dcc address oo
mhn_416
i have a digitrax operating system power on ytacks read 7.5volts
x2=15volts.however when i try to run an anologe train on the address 00 the train runs very slowly i have tried dfferent anologe trains with the same result. any suggestions? peter |
Re: DT100
wirefordcc
If you want a detailed answer, you are going to have to wait about a
week and half when I have more time. Here is what you need to do. You need to clear the Chief's slots. If my memory serves me right, check options 32 thru 36. One of them is labeled something like clear roster, slots, or locos. If you are not using routes and things, it won't hurt to clear them all. To clear an option, flip the DCS100 to OPT. Using your DT100, hit mode until a black dot appears under Switch. Then dial up the option you want to change. Then press the c or t key. If you are not sure whether to hit c or t, hit them both (one at a time). Hopefully, this is enough info for you. Otherwise, you will need to wait until I am done with final exams. |
DT100
lhannahan
I got some answers earlier. I just don't quite get it yet. If anybody
can help me again, my DT100 is showing FF on the right hand side of the throttle. This of course, makes it unable to key in a loco address. I know the FF means the DCS100 is full. Can someone help me by telling me HOW to do away with the FF and get it back to normal? What I really need, is some detail steps on how to do this. I looked all over the book and cannot find the answer. Who ever can help me through this trauma; this will be most appreciated, please send me an e-mail at lhannahan@.... Thanks in advance. |
Re: Wiring Blocks Common Rail or Isolate both rails?
wirefordcc
Steve,
You have 4 possible areas of failure: 1. The BD4 isn't wired up correctly to the track. I don't see the BD4 manual on Digitrax's website so I can't help you much. I am using BD1s which require that a particular terminal go to your track. If the BD4 is like this, make sure you have it wired up correctly. You may want to connect your BD4 temporarily directly to your booster and a short section of track for test purposes. 2. The BD4 isn't wired up correctly to the DS54. You will just have to consult the manuals for the BD4 and DS54. 3. Your DS54 isn't programmed correctly. I provide a table of CV values for your DS54 which will enable block detection and send Loconet messages. 4. Your method of displaying detection messages on Loconet isn't set up correctly. I assume you are using a computer to detect to your Loconet messages from the DS54. You should also see messages from your throttles. Make sure it is picking them up. |
Re: Wiring Blocks Common Rail or Isolate both rails?
steve
My problem is that i have a BD4 occupancy detector, which i am
trying to use to trigger a DS54. All Blocks run through a Powershield circuit breaker and are all on one booster. the BD4 doesn't seem to be sensing and i'm not sure i'm connecting it correctly. Any assitance would be apreciated. --- In WiringForDCC@..., "wirefordcc" <wire4dcc_admin@c...> wrote: are okay with what you have.That's just a personal choice. If you have double gapped everything, youthe black for each booster are NOT connected together. NEVER connectthe outputs of boosters together. DO NOT have a common betweenboosters.
|
Re: Wiring Blocks Common Rail or Isolate both rails?
wirefordcc
Steve,
I'm not quite sure I am following your question. Maybe I'm not following you as to how you have your railroad wired. I think you are okay with what you have. Here is the URL from my website that shows two rails with all the associated wiring. The heavy black lines are labeled Rail "A" and "B". I double gap everything. I find it is easier on my sanity. That's just a personal choice. If you have double gapped everything, you are fine. Notice that my rail "B" has many gaps in it, but those gaps are effectively bridged by the white wire. The white wire is labeled COMMON BUS on the drawing. Notice however, that the white and the black for each booster are NOT connected together. NEVER connect the outputs of boosters together. DO NOT have a common between boosters. Hopefully, this information and the drawing answer your question. Allan --- In WiringForDCC@..., "steve" <snorring@a...> wrote: each section. I am using DCC and will be installing a BD4 to operatelayout, or can i leave both rails isolated? I have all my power comming |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss