Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
You said it yourself; you joined this group to talk with like-minded people.? Someone who only talks with like-minded people is hardly what I would consider to be open-minded. They can be
By
robfrankel
·
#1894
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
You said it yourself; you joined this group to talk with like-minded people. Someone who only talks with like-minded people is hardly what I would consider to be open-minded. On another note, someone
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1893
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
As an outsider, I have a few points to make regarding Cathy's last post. I am not delving into voter fraud. The statement insuating that the opposition is part of the silencing and discourse in the US
By
Allyson Taylor
·
#1892
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
You are absolutely correct . I know that the older a Democrat is the more he tends to believe that the Democrat party is the same one as John F. Kennedy or Franklin Roosevelt. Unfortunately, they not
By
robfrankel
·
#1891
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Funny to question the motives of True the Vote, but not the motives of the Washington Post, despite of years of it pushing proven lies. Normies are normies because they trust normie corporate news.
By
Douglas Minnick
·
#1890
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Ok Cathy.? We will obviously never see eye to eye.? I'm not angry, I'm tired.? Tired of the same back and forth that has been going on for years.? I joined this group to talk with like minded
By
sonja nyman
·
#1889
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Cathy, refusing to investigate factual data offered up to you is hardly indicative of your open mind. ?Further, merely copying and pasting others' biased opinions doesn't do much for your
By
robfrankel
·
#1888
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
The one thing I am is open minded otherwise, you and I would not be having this dialog. I deliberately use big font to post quotes from other sources. I am not merely regurgitating ¡°stuff¡± from
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1887
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Oh, I don't think Cathy's ruined anything at all.? She's entitled to her opinions, however much we may disagree with them. More to the point, she's doing us a favor by proving everything about
By
robfrankel
·
#1886
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
THIS is why Cathy should stick to Next Door.? She doesn't have the time to to watch something but has to time to clearly copy and paste stuff she regurgitates from the internet (the different fonts
By
sonja nyman
·
#1885
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
What makes me say that is your very clear bias without even investigating any of the facts, while hiding behind a "busy schedule". If you really were interested in the facts, you would investigate
By
robfrankel
·
#1884
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Now what makes you say that, Rob? Turns out the basis of that film is put out by a company with very dubious motives, mainly to line their own pockets by way of supporting the ¡°big lie¡±. Anything
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1883
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Cathy, You really should make the time.
By
sonja nyman
·
#1882
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Okay, so NOW we know that Cathy is just another diehard liberal, believing the lefty narratives no matter how baseless their arguments are, or devoid of any factual information, denying proven data
By
robfrankel
·
#1881
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
https://revealnews.org/article/true-the-vote-big-lie-election-fraud/?gclid=CjwKCAjwtIaVBhBkEiwAsr7-cxb623P4ognOmngZ2w37mNfdYYHJnMTkJM9e_vCGI_I4o11YKuscKBoCS7wQAvD_BwE Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 8:07
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1880
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
p.s. My TV¡¯s are still analog so I don¡¯t have online streaming. Is it available elsewhere? Seems to me there are now 3 HD TV¡¯s in my home but they have not been set up. People keep giving them
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1879
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Thank you Maybe. Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 7:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [valleyredspace] You wanted proof? Here's some Maybe she'll surprise you. -- Rob Frankel Chief
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1878
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
I wish I had the time! I don¡¯t see TV or movies or much of anything. I work and I work and I work. I run a law firm and a non-profit giant breed dog rescue. Both are 24/7. Sent: Thursday, June 9,
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1877
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Maybe she'll surprise you. -- Rob Frankel Chief Curmudgeon
By
robfrankel
·
#1876
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
I have too but from Cathy¡¯s emails, I don¡¯t she will even bother to see it. From: <[email protected]> on behalf of robfrankel <rob@...> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date:
By
Sheri Herman
·
#1875
·
|