¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: Google Protocol Buffers usage in the latest Java API
For future reference, here are the download links for API version 10.34.02 which is the last version that doesn't use Protocol Buffers:
By Orionn · #54227 ·
Re: disconnect on larger MKT, LMT orders on us equities
Hi J¨¹rgen, thank you for pointing out once more that it is a strange case and must be on my side. It actually was - i found it Albert
By albert@... · #54226 ·
Re: Google Protocol Buffers usage in the latest Java API
I agree with J¨¹rgen on this one.? I tried 10.36.02 on my Linux platform to test building and running it to see what benefits I got.? I even used the latest C++ protobuf/abseil libraries and, after
By tjisana · #54225 ·
Re: Google Protocol Buffers usage in the latest Java API
You are most likely correct in that all messages will eventually be converted to Protobuf style messages. Unfortunately, IBKR does not even communicate intentions or rationales to the member of the
By J¨¹rgen Reinold · #54224 ·
Re: Google Protocol Buffers usage in the latest Java API
Talking to myself here: I see in 10.37, he has added 13 new proto types, and all the order place / status msg's, and a lot more, now use protobuf.? So the full conversion is being forced onto us. I
By rossh_yh · #54223 ·
Re: disconnect on larger MKT, LMT orders on us equities
I cannot think of any reason why TWS/IBGW would disconnect your client in the scenario you have described. Is there a chance that your client calls disconnect() under certain circumstances and that
By J¨¹rgen Reinold · #54222 ·
disconnect on larger MKT, LMT orders on us equities
I am using TWS under python and when I place orders on us_equities like AAPL or so and they have more than e.g. 200 shares, the following happens: - sometimes I get filled right away, and in the next
By albert@... · #54221 ·
Moderated Re: Looking For TWS API Developer
JWoods Have you not been paying attention to the posts on this thread? We don¡¯t want your conversations on this topic to be sent to the whole group: you should communicate directly with the relevant
By Richard L King · #54220 ·
Moderated Re: Looking For TWS API Developer
The general setup is this. We want to build a system to assist with automating trading activities initially starting with very basic features and over time we grow the project with more features. The
By JWoods · #54219 ·
Moderated Re: Looking For TWS API Developer
I've unlocked this topic again because there was no way to find out what email address to reply to if you were trying to reply via the groups.io website. So if you want to reply in this way, set the
By Richard L King · #54218 ·
Moderated Re: Looking For TWS API Developer
I'm locking this topic as our thousands of members are not interested in individuals' responses to this request. If you want to contact the poster about the project, do so via a private message.
By Richard L King · #54217 ·
Moderated Re: Looking For TWS API Developer
Hi JWoods et al. I've 10y experience with IBKR's API but in C#. Coupled with MSSQL. I've always looked to partner with someone with regards to ATS software for IBKR. But somehow I find it difficult to
By Daniel Ferreira · #54216 ·
Moderated Looking For TWS API Developer
Hello Looking for experienced IBKR TWS C++ API developers to assist on long term project. Our team is new to TWS API and currently working our way through the samples , its unfortunate ibkr seems to
By JWoods · #54215 ·
Re: reqAccountSummary() socket API request unkown extra field (50000001)
Well in every Place_order message, you will have to send all the superfluous latest version extra fields, because the TWS engine will not accept only half the fields.? The same goes when getting the
By rossh_yh · #54213 ·
Re: reqAccountSummary() socket API request unkown extra field (50000001)
I have not yet tryed to find out what was this "binary Protobuf" thing. Will it replace the ASCII messages as well as the socket or is it just a replacement of ASCII messages with binary messages ? Of
By Tradiator · #54212 ·
Re: reqAccountSummary() socket API request unkown extra field (50000001)
Well, the difference is simple and pretty significant: * The TWS API interface contract is defined by the function signatures of requests (EClient) and responses (EWrapper) and the related data
By J¨¹rgen Reinold · #54211 ·
Re: reqAccountSummary() socket API request unkown extra field (50000001)
Thank you again Richard, I now know where to find the right information. I had tryed to use the recommended TWS API languages: C++, C#, Python (genered by chatGPT) but found this difficult as I dont
By Tradiator · #54210 ·
Re: reqAccountSummary() socket API request unkown extra field (50000001)
There is no such document, but since the code is freely accessible (and is already on your computer if you¡¯ve installed the API), it¡¯s easiest to just look at the code. For example the C-# API has
By Richard L King · #54208 ·
Re: reqAccountSummary() socket API request unkown extra field (50000001)
Hi, I still have a hard time trying to determine the correct sequence of bytes at the socket level for the "reqHistoricalData" request. Here is what I am sending: 00 00 00 66 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ;
By Tradiator · #54207 ·
Re: Correlate orders and fills from the API to those in Flex Report
Perhaps group members who use paper trading can elaborate and confirm an experience similar to yours. As for the regular trading account, my email subscription for flex reports has been delivering a
By ds-avatar · #54206 ·