I have no objections at all, Richard, and documenting such a path may even be helpful for people who want to integrate other languages in the future.
I just want to avoid that the entire group will be exposed to the long and painful TWS API re-implementation process from scratch in PureBasic.
Looking forward to seeing what you came up with.
闯ü谤驳别苍
?
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 12:54 PM, Richard L King wrote:
Can I just say that @Tradiator’s earlier post today has actually opened up a possibility to move forward with PureBasic. I’m in the middle of drafting a response to it that will indicate a way to proceed. It’ll be a while before I’m ready to post it though.
?
So if no-one objects, I’ll post that response here in due course (in case it might be useful for someone else in future), and I can then follow up privately with @Tradiator if he wants to try my suggestion.
?
闯ü谤驳别苍. If you’d rather I didn’t, let me know and I’ll just send it direct to him.
?
Richard
?
