Thanks for your e-mail. I will be out of town for 3 days and will respond
after returning. Please direct future e-mails to???????????
kybryan@...??????????????
thanks
marinindextrader wrote:
?I transfered this question to the VB message
board I haunt.
Here is a response from one guy there:
Re: C++ vs. C#.NET vs. VB.NET
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
In .NET, pretty much all the languages are on equal footing. I
think
VB is at a disadvantage with some of the OO stuff, though. I don't
think it has function overloading, which is extremely useful, and
I'm
still not sure how much inheritance it allows. I could be wrong
on
these, though. I haven't used VB.NET at all. 90% of code or more
will
be almost exactly the same with VB and C# because of the shared
framework, which is where almost everything in .NET comes from.
It
basically comes down to whether you want to use curly braces or
not.
The difference in the two is that small. I haven't looked too much
into C++, and I haven't seen much documentation on C++.NET at all.
In my opinion, C++ is useful for three kinds of developers:
1) Ones who find that speed isn't satisfactory in other languages
2) People who need low-level access to the system
3) Gluttons for punishment. :)
Chris
?
--- In twsapi@y..., "dtkamp" wrote:
> In recent thread on IB board, Kent commented that C++ was the
way
to
> go for creating serious apps. Is this really true any more if
you're
> starting from .NET, where all of its languages are based on same
> underlying runtime lib.s and architecture. For purposes of building
a
> killer trading app, does it really matter much whether you're
using
> VB.NET or C#.NET or C++? And can't you just mix in legacy C and
C++
> lib.s as necessary?
?
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
twsapi-unsubscribe@...
?
?
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
