开云体育

For anyone stumbling upon this thread and wanting files sorted differently, the underlying file access is at the raw FAT. Files on the SD card aren't sorted for display, they are listed based on the

Not a big deal, but I'm interested how to grab a screen capture after a completed selftest (no errors) on an ultra+. When the self test is complete it states touch the screen to exit, touching the SD

John, I am willing to discuss the details of the clone "in-private", but Erik didn't seem interested in my attempt to report another fake clone. Regards.

Hello fellow amateur radio user! All I wanted to do was to report a new fake clone which wasn't mentioned anywhere on the site. Simple as that. Regards.

But it was found on Amazon.? As the TinySA guys hold trademarks/copyright - that should give them more rights to get those took down. That's why I wanted to report it.

I think the OP was thinking of a list of where clones were on sale, rather than details of the differences. Better to stick to the list of where to buy real ones

The criteria are set a bit too strict. Will update the FW in the near future to solve this minor problem -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

Hi Hasan, that is exactly the same selftest behaviour than with me! I have sent my Tinysa back to vendor, but I wonder it might be a systematic error. Perhaps the tolerances of test#8 are a bit

I can confirm that the latest firmware has fixed the spurs as reported on my ZS-407. after installing the latest firmware did a self test - all ok, but I notice that the reference level (top left) and

Thanks Bob, seems there will be no other choice than to get it exchanged. But i still wonder how "severe" it is if not passed !

Hasan, This sounds a lot like the problem that was reported and resolved just yesterday in this thread: /g/tinysa/message/19737 Bob W6CP

Hi, ""So you don't want reports of new clones of your hardware?? Am I getting that right?"" yup ....? there's pretty much nothing that can e done about the clone sites anyway ""If so, that's

bad guys on how to avoid detection. That's not rocket science. Please apply brain to issue and conform to the wishes of the developers who have done such a spectacular job. ++++++++++++++ --

Erik, Thanks for replying, wasn't expecting the designer to reply. So you don't want reports of new clones of your hardware?? Am I getting that right? If so, that's fine and will leave it at

Hi guys, I got the? TinySA Ultra+ ZS406 today from Eleshop. I updated the firmware to tinySA4_v1.4-198-g996a67b.bin (Picture 1). Before that, I had a Firmware from January 2025. I did the Self test

No. Please do not share any information on clones here. -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

I don't like FAKE hardware clones.? The original developers/artists/etc deserve that (as one myself). Is this the right place to report a new clone I found? Thanks.

Erik, Maybe you want to lower the tolerance for this self test item. Roger

Hugen, your comment is interesting for me, because the test fail #8 did not occur in every test run. Sometimes there are 4 or 5 good runs , but the next fails. Sometimes there a 3 or 4 bad runs that

Sorry, it really isn't a clone. This is due to a deviation in the IF filter, and although we have rechecked it several times during the production process, there are still some with smaller deviations