开云体育

Hi Erik I also wondered about this low value. The -27dBm – 3dB is far to low a level but I could not produce a higher level of time of writing. That is simply that my R&S CRTU port 3 which

Here are my measurements. Only settings changed from default where RBW set to manual 10kHz in second measurement both with attenuation set to manual and 0dB First two signals at 0dBm with combiner

DiSlord So now you have two tinySA you can help me with the serial interface so one tinySA can control a second tinySA and do all kind of interesting measurements such as scalar S21 of frequency

Kurt In your document you state: "The combined signal tested with the R&S CRTU-RU And the IOP3 lower than -75dB relative carrier levels so it seem like the TinySA has an build in IOP3 of 4.7dB which

So... I ordered a tinySA today and the purchase page said delivery is estimated to be October 2020. Maybe that is so I won't be disappointed if it had said tomorrow by lunch time <evil grin>. I

DiSlord, I'm sure Erik and hugen would agree that your contributions to the tinySA FW were priceless, and I'm glad the 2 tinySA v0.3 devices did not take as long to reach you as your beta device did

Kurt, When I originally ran TinySA.exe the levels displayed in the application were 3dB different than those on the tinySA display.? I questioned Erik about the difference and he said it was caused

Nice job, Kurt.

TinySA internal for calculation use measure?data * 32, for not send negative values additional add 128 This 32 multiplier need for not use slow floating point calculations, and give error 1/32 ~ 0,03

I also add better timing measure (CW freq sync), triggers, remove many slow floating points operations, speedup sweep speed, update graphic plot code, and UI PS today i receive 2 tinySA v0.3 from

I have a Siglent I bought recently, plus I am hoping to find a good used HP or something to get me up closer to 20 gigs.? As a beta tester, I have two tinySAs here now. But as soon as they were

Hi All For those still considered to purchase a TinySA I have made a very rude report which gives an idea how it is to use the TinySA and see the complexity of this fantastic product My apology for

Hi Erik I slowly learn to treat the TinySA the right way. One funny detail is that the vertical grid lines for the Log sweep show up when Center frequency is set to 0 and the span to max

Bill, I collected a box of cable and TV tuners that I had been intending to use in a similar project by Science Dynamics, or? some company with a similar name.? It would have been fun, but no way my

Dick, Nice dB comparison.? I also continue to be surprised by how functional the NanoVNA-F, NanoVNA-H4 and SAA2 are in comparison to their price.? I have a couple of higher end spectrum analyzers

Hi, I jumped on the nanoVNA and I got satisfaction right away. I am not so sure the tinySA will do the same for me. I have already started on a homebrew SA to use with one of my O'scopes and based on

Considering the price difference between the tinySA and the Siglent is about 14dB, I don't expect equal performance. I just want to see how close they are. Similar comparisons with the nanoVNA and

Dick, The tinySA will pale in comparison to your Siglent, but for a hobbyist or student that can't afford a $1000 instrument and wants to learn the basis of spectrum analysis measurements it will be a

________________________________ Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 8:33 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [tinysa] How long till your tinySA is shipped? I placed my order a week or

My mistake, just checked PayPal. It wasn't that long. Must be my chomping at the bit to get my hands on it and compare it to my new Siglent. 73, Dick, W1KSZ ________________________________ Sent: