开云体育

Sounds like it's time to stop buying from that chinese site. I know some people like the site, but at some point they will get you with something.

I opened a dispute on Aliexpress and linked on they wiki and on this posting to confirm the seller is selling unauthorized clones. Of course the seller rejected my dispute and claimed he sells same

Good Morning All, Didn't fail ST-9 this morning. I attached screen lock images of ST-7 and ST-8 failing tests. 73'sJoeKD9IEG? On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:13 AM, Erik Kaashoek<erik@...>

I purchased one from R&L last night. The one I had issues with was purchased off of Ebay (seller: ideafoxtrot)

Can you post a picture of the failing selftest #9? Test #9 was made more sensitive in newer FW, maybe too sensitive. ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to

I just purchased one from R & L which should be the real thing and they said they have plenty in stock as of Thursday. Should be at my brother tomorrow and will reply here if theirs any problems with

Eric, it fails test #9 with 77 I installed older firmware and could not get it to fail. also, is there a list of what each test is?

Which selftest fails with what message? -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/

If you have male-to-female connector savers on your SA they make a nice handy touch point for grounding yourself when you pick up the unit. 73 -Jim NU0C "Roger Need via groups.io"

Just tried the self test with some $900 GORE jumper cables and it passes all the time with 77, well so far. I wonder if its an noise issue, I have TONS of RFI here and the GORE is much better

Don't cheat yourself out of owning one of the finest pieces of test equipment available to the hobbyist/experimenter/ham radio enthusiast.? Buy from one of the suggested

Roger - Mine failed right out of the box and appears to be a clone model which I had no clue existed. Shipping back to seller tomorrow and will probably scratch the idea of buying one now. On Sun,

I had some difficulty getting the link to work but copy and paste it to the Google search window worked FB. A good read and excellent info to keep in mind for the Tinysa and the whatever flavour of

Some users have unfortunately experienced TinySA failures.? Some may be from production issues but others are probably due to exceeding safe levels at the input or perhaps from ESD (static)

Hello all, I purchased my SA from Amazon a few months ago and as far as i can tell it's the real deal? Anyways, it never failed self test until I upgraded firmware to 77 and now it will fail about 1

FWIW I have had no ESD issues with my early TinySA and I don't exactly baby it. It may be because after 30+ years of working with PCs both professionally and as a hobby I have developed ESD-safe

There is some ESD protection when the attenuator is set to manual minimum 10dB. -- ------------------------------------------ For more info on the tinySA go to https://tinysa.org/wiki/

Test 12 tests the attenuator so it's normal test 12 fails. As the levels are off due to wrong attenuator some other test may be critical . Not a real

Hello All; Hello:? ?My tinySA appears to have an attenuator issue also... it's a real unit, from R&L. I have also verified the PCB etc. My testing shows a large attenuator error pic 1, and pict 2

I wonder if there are some static issues. Not having a schematic I wonder if there is ESD protection on the input. An analyzer that can only be used if it is in a static free environment is kinda