开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Re: Physical size?
Same size, picture scaling went wrong -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki
By Erik Kaashoek · #19209 ·
Re: Quick general questions on persisting the calibration data
Lutz, The purpose of the calibration? indeed to remove the jump in the signal when it switches to harmonic mode. A jump in the noise is unavoidable as the signal path loss increases due to harmonic
By Erik Kaashoek · #19208 ·
Re: ZS-407 is here
Thanks. I also saw some results at? EEBlog, https://www.eevblog.com/forum/rf-microwave/the-new-tinysa-ultra/ Not bad
By Leif M · #19207 ·
Re: Quick general questions on persisting the calibration data
Erik, thanks again. I do have one more question, regarding the harmonic mixing part above 5.34GHz. I used the NanoVNA's generator's third harmonic (of 1.78GHz) at around -40dBm to run the calibration
By lschafer@... · #19206 ·
Re: Ham bands
Quote from WiKi: * *HAM BANDS* enables the gray shading showing the location of the USA ham bands *
By Clyde Lambert · #19205 ·
Re: Ham bands
Great idea. That’s what they did with that feature on the SARK110.
By Terry Perdue · #19204 ·
Physical size?
There’s a picture of the various tinySAs on the wiki that implies that the Ultra+ is physically larger than the Ultra. If it is, what are its dimensions? I can’t find them in the specs.
By Terry Perdue · #19203 ·
Re: Ham bands
Add a menu option to select the different ITU regions? 73 Stan KM4HQE
By Stan Gammons · #19202 ·
Re: Ham bands
The Wiki says ‘USA ham bands’.
By Terry Perdue · #19201 ·
Re: Ham bands
Of course.
By Terry Perdue · #19200 ·
Locked Re: Attenuation for Ultra
Yes, installation of a 40 dB attenuator and starting with 5-watts or +37 dBm (yes, your math is correct), will yield +37 dBm minus 40 dB = -3 dBm or 0.0005 watts. The "safe" input level Eric states
By W0LEV · #19199 ·
Locked Re: Attenuation for Ultra
OK, really quick... Your math is correct. +37dBm - 40dB= -3dBm To get to -25dBm --> you need +37 dBm - 62dB = -25 dBm 73, Geoff --> AB6BT
By Geoff Peters - AB6BT · #19198 ·
Locked Re: Attenuation for Ultra
This all makes sense. So what I do not understand is how with a 5w transmitter - which (if my math is right) is 37dbm, a 40db attenuator gets you to the minimum -25dbm safety threshold for the
By Joe Tomasone · #19197 ·
Locked Re: Attenuation for Ultra
OK, I'll try: Your confusion may come from not understanding the dB and logarithms related to actual power. 1) The advantage in reasoning/thinking in dB space is that the dB, like logarithms, add
By W0LEV · #19196 ·
Locked Attenuation for Ultra
I've been reading the responses to my own thread on here and watching several YouTube videos and still feel like I do not have a good handle on the attenuation required. In the videos, I have seen
By Joe Tomasone · #19195 ·
Re: Ham bands
They are correct for ITU Region 1, which is expected since Erik lives in that region. We are in Region 2. Larry - AC8YE Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) secure email.
By Larry - AC8YE · #19194 ·
Re: Ham bands
50 - 54 for 6m, not 50.1 [email protected]> wrote:
By Robin Midgett · #19193 ·
Re: Quick general questions on persisting the calibration data
Harmonic is sufficient Clear Config resets everything back to factory defaults. > > > > -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki
By Erik Kaashoek · #19192 ·
Re: Ham bands
Hi Erik, I just noticed that the Ham Band shading is incorrect for three of the USA band allocations. (I didn't check bands above 800MHz.) The 75/80 Meter band is 3.5 MHz - *4.0* MHz, but is only
By Terry Perdue · #19191 ·
Re: Quick general questions on persisting the calibration data
Thank you Erik. Regarding the level calibration for the higher part >5.34GHz, would a square signal with lower fundamental (e.g. 1.78GHz) containing a strong harmonic at exactly 5.34GHz be sufficient,
By lschafer@... · #19190 ·