开云体育

I'm sorry, here are the full screenshots this time. I just opened the CSV file and found out that the correct values are in WWB, which means the if the tinySA-App shows a frequency peaking at

Johann, In addition to 30 MHz, I would select the frequencies that I normally expect to measure, or failing that, since I believe that Erik's algorithm calculates the level compensation of the

Hi Hai, It is not my video: I found it by searching youtube. Just by visual from video, I think that I saw it could be bought online /ebay/amazon etc. By searching/reading recent posts/ "cca. last 30

Except the 30 MHz point you can choose all frequencies as you like. -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

Ok, works nice. Is there any specific reason for the certain selection of the frequencies for the curve points? - I do not see a mathematical system in the steps. Can I select them free w/o violating

It depends on which instrument you trust, and the type of modulation in use. It's difficult to tell from your screen grabs, but WWB seems to have a much higher noise floor, in relation to the peak

Hi everyone. I got a TinySA and I've been learning how to use the scans from the Windows App for coordinating wireless mics frequencies. A few days ago, I found out there is a difference of

Toni, Most dominant problem is seeing a mirror/ghost? at an offset of roughly 2 GHz from the actual signal. So whenever you see broadband signal 2 GHz away from another broadband signal you may

@ToniZG Hi, could you please specify what software you used to generate those graphs ?

You have to enter upfront the actual output level of the generator. Then you select each point, set the generator to the correct frequency and check if the signal is visible and the marker is

ok, thanks - i found it. How does it work? when I select this menu point, I am asked for the actual level - I assume I have to apply a single signal with known level, the tinySA software uses the

One thing I need to add The power of the short burst will only be measured correctly if their maximum power is at most 60 dB above the noise level as the AGC inside the tinySA can not react to such

Mike, Interesting experiment. I took a signal generator at 10 MHz and -10 dBm and changed the signal burst length starting with 0.1 micro seconds and 10 ms burst repetition time The tinySA was set to

Thanks Roger. <snip from keysight link> "With an FFT rate of almost 120,000 per second and FFT overlapping, each display update represents about 2,500 spectra of gap-free data capture." OK I get that

I now also placed order for pre-amp ZK-09BM from Zeenko store! BTW, I've received the good TinySA ultra from the Zeenko store yesterday, instead illegal clone, that I received earlier from unsafe

The TinySA sweep rate is not fast enough to capture short duration burst signals like this. The Fieldfox will do the job but it costs 100 times more. ?Optimized circuitry for these types of signals.

I recently purchased a TinySA Ultra in hopes of being able to measure the strength of a radar signal at various locations of my property. After weeks of comparing the (borrowed) Agilent FieldFox

Please see the mail I send, thanks.

Hello John, you can remove the USB port or scrape the solder resist of the wire near the USB port and solder the power supply. If you want us to make a version without the USB port, and if the power

Mine arrived today, really fast shipping. What impressed me was the small size. The gain and noise figure are as expected. It does roll off above 6GHz quickly but that is to be expected. I do wonder