Indeed, see this
--

In the WIKI,? for the ULTRA I'm missing a desciption of the NF measurement "(TBD)".
Thnks,
Jos

New Ultra FW release
Version V1.4067
Changes:
- Added a MULTI TRACE option to the MULTI BAND menu. Enabling this option will scan the bands in a consecutive traces instead of scanning all bands in one trace. WARNING: at least waterfall does not work in this mode but other problems may emerge

The purpose of this release is to get feedback on this MULTI BAND feature. If you are not interested in this feature there is no need to install this new FW.

• Is it MULTI BAND usable?
• Where does it brake? (it will for sure brake certain features)

--

Use DISPLAY/SWEEP TIME setting to reduce the sweep speed
Use LEVEL/TRIGGER menu to enable a pre-trigger so the whole screen is used and set trigger to NORMAL and set the trigger level
You only have limited amount of pixels horizontally some many transmissions will not fit on one screen

--

Hi Folks,

I recently tried to use the TinySA in zero span mode at 433.92 MHz to look at the pulse train of a remote key fob.

It does show up, but the sweep speed is too fast and? I can't get the whole train in view, nor can I figure out if I can save it on screen.

I want to be able to identify the pulse widths in order to replicate the waveforms accurately with a 433 MHz eBay module.

Does anyone have any experience with this? I cannot afford a 500 MHz and up scope.

John KC1IDN

Steve,
many thanks, will update the wiki
--

开云体育

David,

Wow, you're tops, VERY nice job. Thanks.

Mike C. Sand Mtn GA

Hello Rob,

Either of these step attenuators is very portable, and you do not need to remove and replace it to change attenuation.



Neither is rated for more than 2 watts, though most other suggestions are 2 watts.

You can always put a 5 watts 6DB attenuator ahead of it.? The minimum attenuation is then 6DB.? That would reduce the power by 4 times.

I would suggest that you pick one that is fully shielded.? I have had issues with attenuators that are not fully enclosed.? Any stray RF can make its way into your measurements if not shielded.

73
Evan
AC9TU

First Use document attached

--

Steve Johnson

? ? ? K0OIL

Hello Zack!
Here
I've bought some of these, up to 8G?
73 de Vladimir, dl7pga

Hi Erik,

Normally you would manually just decide upon which combination of signals you wished to use, based on the usual formula, but I guess you could set them up automatically (or choose which sets to use) as long as you know the frequencies of the test signals in use.

So for an IMD 2 & 3 test you would probably only need four or six markers in total (including the two test signals) but would maybe need to be able to select which sets of IMD products you wish to use for the measurement. The usual constraints are the operating frequency range of the item under test, and which set of 2nd and 3rd IMD products that are produced are the highest in level. You would normally do a quick check of the various sets and then just use the worst case values.?

Let me think about this and I'll try and give an example. I think there may be some manufacturers guidance notes (possibly Keysight) somewhere on-line too.

Regards,

Martin

Maximum is 8 markers

Steve, great offer, much appreciated?
--

I think the markers are the more important features when using this mode.

Would it then be possible to add some additional measurement functions such as harmonic levels relative to carrier and also 2nd & 3rd order IMD.

Ideally with the option to specify an off-set to the level of the two test signal carrier levels, to compensate for any notch filters that may be used ahead of the analyser to prevent overload during such tests.

The ability to see small concurrent slices of narrow frequency bands, makes it possible to use small bandwidths in each slice, which is not possible with the wide sweep that would normally be required to encompass all of the carriers and their complex harmonics and IMD components.

IP2 & IP3 could then be calculated and read directly.

Regards,

Martin

I have created a GUI front-end for the script and complied it to a Windows .exe much simplifying the installation and operation of it.?

It also incorporates Jason Glass' amplitude bug correction.

Find it here:

https://github.com/bradbbot/TinySAforRFguys/tree/main/TinySA4RFDialog

--

Note that the qrpkits attenuator will not run at 5 watts continuous at all settings.? If only the 20dB stage is engaged, the 2 watt input resistor of the pi section sees over 4 watts.? If you are careful of which stages are engaged and which end is driven at high power, you can get the 5 watt performance.
--John Gord

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 01:15 PM, Roger Need wrote:

https://www.amazon.com/Nooelec-SMA-Attenuator-Kit-Line/dp/B07YYMT65T

I like that set as well.

larry

@Kurt, just watched your video and it is very good and very helpful.?

@Erik, I will rewrite your first use page incorporating my comments.? I'll post it here and you can decide to use none of it, all of it, or any portion of it as you wish.?
--

Steve Johnson

? ? ? K0OIL