开云体育

Hello, I bought a TinySA from the secure seller Eleshop B.V. Nevertheless, I am not so sure that it is an original. The following points: Switching on only works by toggling the power switch and when

I have a whole set of those SMA 2 watt attenuators I use for a lot of things. They are in 1 dB increments between 1 and 10 dB, and 5 dB increments from there to 30 dB. I also have a Kay switchable

Yep my HP 8660 leaks a small amount but as long as proper cables are used it still seems to be accurate into a 50 ohm load. Within about 1dB.

Even my HP 8648C set to -136 dBm (the minimum internally available output) plus additional external attenuation leaks just a wee tiny bit! Still good for receiver MDS evaluations. I've never looked at

My approach would be to use one of those small SMA connector attenuators. They're fairly inexpensive and you can get them in levels from 3DB to 30 dB. That's what I use. I even use it for low-level

Minimum output level used to be -120 dBm but not all HW was able to reach this level so the limit was set to -115 dBm The limiting factor is leakage which can not be improved within current cost and

Is there any future plan to drop the minimum signal level output available below -115 dbm? This would be more useful for receiver sensitivity testing since most radios levels are around -117 dbm to

passed selft test, updated to newest fw

According to tinysa.org banggood removed tinysa trademark and now is selling only clones. But now, there is only one option for tinysa different models to buy and all of them has tinysa trademark and

Topic closed -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

I have and use an 8556 in the 852 mainframe. Didn't know it is BWO based. The lowest range which tops out at 3 GHz is pretty clean. The other ranges are the problem. And, yes, the "ID" button for use

I had an old HP 856/8556 BWO-based spectrum analyzer at my first job, in 1975.? It, like all of the old non-preselected analyzers, had plentiful images and mixing products. It had a Signal Identifier

I have a Polarad. Haven't used it in years. No room for it on the bench. It was my first SA "W0LEV via groups.io" <davearea51a@...> wrote: -- 73 -Jim NU0C

Very pleased to say I went to grab a copy of the 175 bin file which was the one thatI had trouble with, and there was the 199 bin file (wasn't there before)which loaded perfectly (using StmCube) with

I would welcome someone looking at the code and suggesting better ways to remove spurs and mirrors Shifting the IF is already done. -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to

Do any of the readers of this group remember the original Polrad spectrum analyzers? Those were my introduction to spectrum analyzers. When you tuned them looking for your signal, there were copious

Did I read it? Oh, yes, but that was the first day I bought this device, was in a hurry to use it, and forgot about it, like about the fine print. My mistake! After I posted my message, I did a deeper

John, Can you explain for those that are less knowledgeable? -- Designer of the tinySA For more info go to https://tinysa.org/wiki

High pass filters are your friend when measuring in ultra mode.