Spliting into groups doesn't make sense to me.
Erik has created hashtags for #tinysa and #ultra and it makes sense to try to use those to identify relavence of messages. Groups.io allows "muting" tags so that people can filter the messages they see.
I say "try" to use hashtags because I suspect that many aren't even aware of the concept. But then I expect that the same would be true if an attempted was made to identify messages with simple word tags.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 01:08 PM, W0LEV wrote:
And the $80 / month = $960 / year is a huge discouragement for any new groups!
Anything and everything these days to make a buck on the part of Google.
?
Google?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 6:53 PM David J Taylor via <david-taylor=
[email protected]> wrote:
On 05/12/2022 17:43, Mike C. wrote:
> David,
>
> A little more detail, if you please, 'why aren't you in favor'? Please explain.
>
> Mike C. Sand Mtn GA
Mike,
It's as Gary says:? "As long as the TinySA and TinySA Ultra remain basically
the same I see no need to artificially separate the discussions about the two.".
Splitting discussions can make things more difficult to find - I think we see
that - at least to a degree - in the multiple "nanoVNA" groups.? Perhaps the
concept of "spectrum analyser" is more familiar to folk with modern equipment
already incorporating spectra and waterfalls.? Erik's videos help a lot, too.
The cost doesn't justify the gain.
Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software for you
Web:
Email: david-taylor@...
Twitter: @gm8arv
--
