Once you understand the workings of a vector network analyzer, going from one model to another, even the "professinal" models ($$$$), this is no longer an issue.? Spend the time to learn the VNA, and you won't have that problem.?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 6:40 PM Gary - W6GVS <gvsmith5@...> wrote:
I would like to add a thought to this discussion.? I'm also own a
NanoVNA-F.? I've owned it for two or three years.? I also
joined the nanovna users and nanovna-f reflectors.? The
nanovna users group is primarily for the H-series models with some
discussion of some of the other iterations not usually including the -F
model.? I've read all of the traffic on the two reflectors and I
have a difficult time separating what works on one model and not on the
other, etc.? I keep the two groups in separate mailboxes in my
e-mail client.? But I still get thoroughly confused by separate
discussions of which firmware and hardware and adjunct software works
with which model.? I have to go into each mailbox to find a answer
to any questions I have.? As long as the TinySA and TinySA Ultra
remain basically the same I see no need to artificially separate the
discussions about the two.
73,
Gary - W6GVS
At 10:08 PM 12/4/2022, you wrote:
Hey Guys,
Since the tinySA and Ultra are two very different animals,
has anyone kicked the can down the road to see if there is any interest
in a separate "Ultra" group? (just thinking, don't shoot the
messenger)
