开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Wideband antenna


 

A better option to the discone is the bicone.? Sure, it's larger, but behaves a bit more like the LP over frequency, but without the directionality.? For his purpose, the discone may serve as the best choice.? I can't imagine what the Schwartzbeck costs.? It's a professional antenna widely used in EMC measurements for radiated emissions.?

If he really wants bandwidth, build a disc dipole.? I recently built an ugly version.? It measured well at or (mostly) under 2:1 from 135 MHz through 3 GHz and the pattern is dipolish.? Off hand I am not aware of anyone marketing such an antenna.? Someone should!

Dave - W?LEV

Dave - W?LEV

On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:01?PM Stan Dye via <standye=[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 01:09 PM, W0LEV wrote:
The Schwartzbeck log periodic is by far the better antenna.?
I agree 100%, Dave.
At least if directionality is the goal.
Since the OP originally posted a vertical antenna, I presumed he wanted omni-directionality with flat gain over a large bandwidth.
And if that is the case, the discone is a better choice than his vertical or the log periodic antenna.



--
Dave - W?LEV


Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.