开云体育

Hey everyone, Some months ago I asked for help in the group and some of you gently answered my survey; now the research paper is out! You can check the preprint

I've not taken the time to look at the survey - sorry. However I did think the OP might be interested in a recent item from?Christiaan Verwijs:

I went on your personal page and discovered you've worked on polarization, biases and misinformation. Like Steve I was surprised by the content of the survey oriented "feelings" and wondered if your

Software development is a people problem, not a technical problem. Understand that you are actually researching people and how they work, so do not ignore hundreds of years of social science research

However, if you survey the people you observe, then you have something useful. If you are not doing observations of how people are actually working, it does not matter what your other dimensions are

Hi Steve! I see your point on the limits of surveys; that's why this is just on of the 3 dimensions we are looking at! And I think the survey is probably the weakest evidence due to the reasons you

Hi Gregory! I will for sure share the results when the paper is ready. What do you mean by polarization? Best, Pedro

Sorry, but as a retired academician and developer, such "promiscuous" surveys are totally worthless as a research tool. No control for biases, especially self-selection biases. Please, work directly

Hi Pedro, Is this work related to polarization ? Would you share with us your results ? Regards, Grégory

Hey folks, how are you? I am a member of a group of researchers interested in studying the impact of testing practices on developer's productivity and well-being. Our goal is to improve the software

wrote: I have a similar impression. You will probably notice, if you continue this way, that you will eventually be duplicating a lot of silly details about GraphQL in your tests, even though the

Hi Mike, my first impression is that you have some interesting logic that is now coupled to your GraphQL engine.? Are you sure you want this?? Since the business logic around your use case might be

I have a domain entity called a "Booking Window" that has a Start Date and End Date, and defines a period in which a Member can make a Booking.? The business is a mobile car wash, and Members can

Here are two techniques for injecting a dependency using the previous example with minimal modification: 1. A function that returns the Product function // the "real" production price logic function

This is what I had expected to do, but since I was working with methods that changed the state of variables closed inside the object... I was just very very wrong about the whole thing.

Indeed, this was the conceptual mistake I made on stage. I was overriding a method that queried a closed variable in the SUT and simultaneously expecting the underlying value to change later. It was a

I looked up Subclass to Test here, https://wiki.c2.com/?SubclassToTest and I'm still not sure if I'm understanding the use case correctly... However. One thing I like about JavaScript is the ability

Sadly Dave is right here - the contents of a closure are, well, closed. Hence the name. Luckily Crockford's Module Pattern is a rare sight these days, I can count on the fingers of one mouse the

I don't believe that using the prototype chain quite accomplishes what is being asked for. "Objects, but not classes" implies the usage of closures to encapsulate data, and I *think* that what is

Hi JB, This is trivially simple in JS, simply create a new object (your "subclass to test") that has its prototype set to your SUT object. All of your SUT methods and attributes will now be