The short answer is that yes, you do the next smallest step. I'm always
amazed how nice it is when I completely 'follow the rules' the process
exists cause its useful and works.
On Jan 21, 2013 9:28 PM, "Josue Barbosa dos Santos" <josuesantos@...>
wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Dave Rooney <daverooneyca@...>
wrote:
**
+1
Dave...
On 13-01-21 2:20 PM, Colin Vipurs wrote:
I can heartily recommend reading "Growing Object Oriented Software:
Guided
by Tests". (
).
It walks you through the entire process, and unlike alot of literature
doesn't shy away from some of the more "hairy" problems. The entire
book
is pretty much an answer to your question
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Matteo Vaccari vaccari@...
wrote:
**
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:47 PM, sh shvfn@...
wrote:
Dear Listables,
...
For example I expect to end up with
- an engine class,
- a scene or context
- a renderer,
- an event- or signal/slot-system,
- an entity/component system
- etc, etc.
When I now start to write my first tests, I guess I start with the
engine class.
... I would not start with that. I would more likely start with the
test
of a simple behaviour of the completed system. Then I'd build just as
little as possible to make the test pass.
Matteo
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--
Abra?os,
´³´Ç²õ³Ü¨¦
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
