Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Crystals in Softrock LTE combined kit
I really don't understand what is happening with the crystals for 20 meters operation.
I understand that the counter needs a frequency that is four times that of the received signal to produce the two out of ?phase signals needed to produce the I an Q outputs.and I read that sampling is done at the 3rd overtone. ?Without a scope or spectrum analyzer I am having trouble trying to picture what the freq. is at the detector produced by the counter. ? The crystal supplied for 20 Meters is 18.73 megahertz. ?? Is the crystal operating at the third overtone to create the 56 Mhz signal or is something else going on? ? ?I think I better buy a scope to really see what is happening. |
On 20m and 30m, the Softrock Lite II uses 1/3 subharmonic sampling. That means that the final sample rate isn't 14 MHz on 20m, it's 14 divided by 3. The actual rate with that crystal is 4.6825MHz for a center frequency of 14.0475MHz. The receiver covers all the usual QRP frequencies with a 48KHz sound card and nearly the entire CW portion of 20m with a 96KHz sound card.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:05 PM, <jackmargolis@...> wrote:
|
Alan
Original Message -----
Subject: [softrock40] Crystals in Softrock LTE combined kit I really don't understand what is happening with the crystals for 20 meters operation. I understand that the counter needs a frequency that is four times that of the received signal to produce the two out of phase signals needed to produce the I an Q outputs.and I read that sampling is done at the 3rd overtone. Without a scope or spectrum analyzer I am having trouble trying to picture what the freq. is at the detector produced by the counter.A scope will not help:) and other messages referring to "Subharmonic" 73 Alan G4ZFQ |
See, also,? (the discussion on sub-harmonic sampling) On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Alan <alan4alan@...> wrote:
Cheers,
Robby
?
Richard R. (Robby) Robson
LTC USA (USA Retired)
|
开云体育On 4/11/2014 3:11 PM, R. R. (Robby)
Robson wrote:
?Hi Robby, That actually has it wrong.? The statement:
The mixer is sensitive to the fundamental and all harmonics of
the mixer sampling freq, but the transformer (with 180deg phasing)
and the hookup of the mixer cancels even harmonics of the freq;
leaving only the fundamental and odd harmonics. Just as you would see with a strobe light the signal will be
reduced (over the same time period).? The reduction for the 3rd
harmonic is 1/3 the voltage on the holding cap.? That give a
overall 20log(1/3) = -9.54dB loss in the signal compare to
receiving the fundamental.? This is the drawback to sub-sampling;
i.e. a reduction in sensitivity.? It does allow the mixer to
switch at a much lower rate which is why it is used. The front end filter rejects the fundamental and also the 5th and
higher harmonic products so you are left with only the third. The harmonic rich LO is often misstated as why the receiver works
with harmonics.? If the LO was a sine wave it would still work
fine (maybe more phase noise, but basically the same). 73,? Mike Collins?? KF4BQ |
Thanks, Mike. As my motto is "steal from the best with pride", do you mind if I lift most of your fine exposition onto my web pages?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Mike Collins <mikecol@...> wrote:
Cheers,
Robby
?
Richard R. (Robby) Robson
LTC USA (USA Retired)
|
开云体育Hey Robby,
Sure no problem.? I'm sure it could be clearer, but hopefully got the idea of the "sampling" for others to understand. 73 and thanks for all your work !! Mike Collins?? KF4BQ On 4/11/2014 4:06 PM, R. R. (Robby) Robson wrote: ? |
The use of subharmonic sampling is not so much to allow the mixer to operate at a lower rate. The switches in the QSD work reasonably well up to 10 meters, and they are used that way in the Ensemble RX II and Ensemble RXTX without subharmonic sampling. The issue in the Lite is that fundamental crystals for frequencies above 30 MHz (remember that the crystal has to be for 4x the operating frequency) are not readily available at a reasonable price. Overtone crystals, which used to be the main way to generate higher frequencies, are no longer easy to find and are not inexpensive. They have mostly been replaced by crystal oscillator modules that use lower frequency crystals and PLL multipliers. Cheap modules are fine for computer clocks but are unsuitable for ham radio LOs because they have not been designed for low phase noise. In fact, computer clocks are often INTENTIONALLY spread to lessen the size of narrow radiated emission peaks. Using an overtone crystal would also require adjustment of the oscillator stage and measurement with high performance test equipment to make sure the oscillator was actually functioning on the correct overtone, negating the goal of a simple and quick build.
If there were enough demand for a Lite variant that would be useful on the higher HF bands (17m through 10m) it might be possible to do a design that incorporated a fixed ratio PLL multiplier in the LO design. You would want to avoid a 4X multiplier because that would place the base LO right at the intended operating frequency and leakage of that signal would be hard to avoid. A 3X or 5X multiplier might be suitable if appropriate inexpensive crystals are available; the Lite uses inexpensive crystals that are mass produced for use as clock oscillators for microcontrollers and their associated peripherals.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Mike Collins <mikecol@...> wrote:
|
Hi Shirley, Mike et All Many thanks for discussing this issue. From my egoistic point of view, using this “sub-harmonic” mode has not only a financial advantage. I’ve remarked that spurious trying to "escape" from the receiver? -antenna circuit- on the fundamental frequency (I mean the Xtal/4 when using tayloe mixer the “traditional” way) are less important when using a sub-harmonic mode. That’s an important point when you are dealing with the high amplification levels of an I.F., even if you are using a high isolation coupler to pickup the signal. The softrock –and other direct conversion SDR using digital mixing devices- are definitely not “clean”. Have your measured the same results on your rigs ? The reason of my interest of this subject is that I’m trying to modify an almost conventional superhet transceiver, and I’m wondering if putting an xtal driven Softrock in the IF (for receiving AND transmitting) would’nt be a nice solution. This would addd new modulation schemes (FM, psk, rtty etc… ) to a “SSB/CW only” rig in RX and in TX. This approach would also give the ability to offer a free (as in beer) bandscope/spectrum-waterfall display to a analog transceiver. Nothing new in fact. I wonder if it would be smart to use the so called “subharmonic” mode? during receiving, and working on the fundamental during transmission (just switching the active xtal with a TX/RX signal, or changing a Si570 I2C word to do the same thing). A kind of “6.2 Lite” working in duplex mode for 10.7 or 9 MHz in other words. Stupid thoughts ? 73' Marc f6itu ? ? |
Alan
Original Message -----
Subject: [softrock40] Re: Crystals in Softrock LTE combined kit Many thanks for discussing this issue. From my egoistic point of view, using this “sub-harmonic” mode has not only a financial advantage. I’ve remarked that spurious trying to "escape" from the receiver -antenna circuit- on the fundamental frequency (I mean the Xtal/4 when using tayloe mixer the “traditional” way) are less important when using a sub-harmonic mode. That’s an important point when you are dealing with the high amplification levels of an I.F., even if you are using a high isolation coupler to pickup the signal. The softrock –and other direct conversion SDR using digital mixing devices- are definitely not “clean”.Marc, I have used this technique for a pandaptor at 47.05MHz As you say, there is no LO in the middle. But surely in the normal mode Softrocks this can be sufficiently reduced, the Z1000 (is that right?) has very good isolation. I'm not sure about any RX/TX combination. You have to interface a digital program with the radio, be it SDR or conventional. Most digimodes use SSB, unless you really want FM modulation is there really any point in making it more complicated? 73 Alan G4ZFQ |
Should you want to eliminate the subharmonic sampling, you can use an ICS501 with the crystal that came with the kit.? If you look in the files section, June 26 2007 I have an article called
Softrock-Lite with ICS501M.pdf Also can be found on my webpage In the article are some photos.? I actually "dead bug" wired the few parts on top of the PCB.? More recently I have used 8 pin SMT adapter boards or custom PCB's.? The parts are inexpensive, really easy to use and directly interface to the softrocks. Also can be found on my webpage I recently bought some 501's from Mouser, so they are still available. Mouser # 972-501MLFT? 1 @ $1,58 Dick K9IVB |