开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: LCR recommendations?

 

Thanks to all, you've given me a lot of options.? I have already been investigating the LC-100A and the "transistor checker" to some extent before posting this inquiry here.? My only concern with those is their longevity as I read of problems sometimes developing months after purchase, particularly the loss of low level inductor and capacitor reading.

I wasn't aware of the NanoVNA's capability to measure inductors and caps.? Correctly me if I'm wrong as it doesn't seem to be a direct measurement according to the videos on the process.

I think under the circumstances, I might just wait a while until I build up more savings for a suitable unit.

Thanks again to all,

Jon

On 7/9/21 6:09 AM, Alan G4ZFQ wrote:
I ended up building a VK3BHR version of those testers and it measures low values very well.
Jim,

I started by building one of those.
It certainly works well, I consider it the best because it will give negative "zero" readings if calibration drifts in use. Particularly useful for low measurements.

73 Alan G4ZFQ




Re: LCR recommendations?

 

I ended up building a VK3BHR version of those testers and it measures low values very well.
Jim,

I started by building one of those.
It certainly works well, I consider it the best because it will give negative "zero" readings if calibration drifts in use. Particularly useful for low measurements.

73 Alan G4ZFQ


Re: LCR recommendations?

 

Hello Rob, Jon, and the group.

The GM328 testers like Rob recommends are good testers.? I have a couple here.? I do not know what experience Rob and his students had with those testers but I found very quickly that none of my GM328 testers would measure inductance or capacitance for low values.? The ones I had would not read (accurately or even ball park) for any inductor less than 3uh and capacitance less than 30pf.? In other words,? it did not and does not measure low values.? I ended up building a VK3BHR version of those testers and it measures low values very well.? If you are not concerned about low value inductance and capacitance then the stock GM328 testers that are so prevalent on ebay and apparently Amazon are good cheap testers.

Thank you.

Jim Pruitt
WA7DUY

On 7/8/2021 3:07 PM, Rob Frohne wrote:
Hi Jon,

My students and I have been using these cheap transistor testers <>. They will measure fairly accurately inductance and capacitance. It should save you from this problem in the future. You can get them cheaper elsewhere.

73,

Rob

KL7NA

On 7/8/21 2:55 PM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Walla Walla University email system.


After my recent experience discovering the bad capacitor only after
almost complete disassembly of the filter, I'm considering getting an
LCR meter but there's only one catch in my case: it has to be low cost.
I know low cost and reasonable quality stay mostly opposite but in
today's market, the relationship between them has increased...
sometimes.? So what would you recommend? Someone recently suggested an
LC-100A, but then I read that it can arrive with issues that make
reading of low value components impossible.? I suppose I could go that
route as long as it had free returns and only from China as the US
vendors are too expensive for me.

Thanks in advance.

Jon







Re: LCR recommendations?

 

Charles wrote:
This looks like the one I have.
My tests

You should not lose out if you buy from Amazon/Ebay, others I do not know. They have good support if the item is not satisfactory when it arrives. Long-term guarantee may not be so good.

73 Alan G4ZFQ


Re: LCR recommendations?

 

Hi Jon,

Another much more accurate instrument to use is the nanoVNA.

73,

Rob

KL7NA

On 7/8/21 3:07 PM, Rob Frohne via groups.io wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Walla Walla University email system.


Hi Jon,

My students and I have been using these cheap transistor testers
<;data=04%7C01%7Crob.frohne%40wallawalla.edu%7Cbc352f6471c84540230008d9425ccabf%7Cd958f048e43142779c8debfb75e7aa64%7C0%7C0%7C637613788575342095%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=w63Nv0MnWMmKoV%2BotdsEGfHV8lu4mTOHI4vGyaYrBGA%3D&amp;reserved=0>.
They will measure fairly accurately inductance and capacitance. It
should save you from this problem in the future. You can get them
cheaper elsewhere.

73,

Rob

KL7NA

On 7/8/21 2:55 PM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Walla Walla University
email system.


After my recent experience discovering the bad capacitor only after
almost complete disassembly of the filter, I'm considering getting an
LCR meter but there's only one catch in my case: it has to be low cost.
I know low cost and reasonable quality stay mostly opposite but in
today's market, the relationship between them has increased...
sometimes.? So what would you recommend? Someone recently suggested an
LC-100A, but then I read that it can arrive with issues that make
reading of low value components impossible.? I suppose I could go that
route as long as it had free returns and only from China as the US
vendors are too expensive for me.

Thanks in advance.

Jon






--
Rob Frohne, Ph.D. P.E.
E. F. Cross School of Engineering
Walla Walla University
100 SW 4th Street
College Place, WA 99362
(509) 527-2075




--
Rob Frohne, Ph.D. P.E.
E. F. Cross School of Engineering
Walla Walla University
100 SW 4th Street
College Place, WA 99362
(509) 527-2075


Re: LCR recommendations?

 


This works for me.? This is MY LC meter.? I tested against many known manufactured inductors and caps and it is accurate enough for my needs.

73
kc1enn

On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 5:55:58 PM EDT, JonI via groups.io <ji425bt@...> wrote:

After my recent experience discovering the bad capacitor only after
almost complete disassembly of the filter, I'm considering getting an
LCR meter but there's only one catch in my case: it has to be low cost.?
I know low cost and reasonable quality stay mostly opposite but in
today's market, the relationship between them has increased...
sometimes.? So what would you recommend? Someone recently suggested an
LC-100A, but then I read that it can arrive with issues that make
reading of low value components impossible.? I suppose I could go that
route as long as it had free returns and only from China as the US
vendors are too expensive for me.

Thanks in advance.

Jon


Re: LCR recommendations?

 

Hi Jon,

My students and I have been using these cheap transistor testers <>.? They will measure fairly accurately inductance and capacitance.? It should save you from this problem in the future. You can get them cheaper elsewhere.

73,

Rob

KL7NA

On 7/8/21 2:55 PM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Walla Walla University email system.


After my recent experience discovering the bad capacitor only after
almost complete disassembly of the filter, I'm considering getting an
LCR meter but there's only one catch in my case: it has to be low cost.
I know low cost and reasonable quality stay mostly opposite but in
today's market, the relationship between them has increased...
sometimes.? So what would you recommend? Someone recently suggested an
LC-100A, but then I read that it can arrive with issues that make
reading of low value components impossible.? I suppose I could go that
route as long as it had free returns and only from China as the US
vendors are too expensive for me.

Thanks in advance.

Jon





--
Rob Frohne, Ph.D. P.E.
E. F. Cross School of Engineering
Walla Walla University
100 SW 4th Street
College Place, WA 99362
(509) 527-2075


LCR recommendations?

 

After my recent experience discovering the bad capacitor only after almost complete disassembly of the filter, I'm considering getting an LCR meter but there's only one catch in my case: it has to be low cost.? I know low cost and reasonable quality stay mostly opposite but in today's market, the relationship between them has increased... sometimes.? So what would you recommend? Someone recently suggested an LC-100A, but then I read that it can arrive with issues that make reading of low value components impossible.? I suppose I could go that route as long as it had free returns and only from China as the US vendors are too expensive for me.

Thanks in advance.

Jon


Re: something odd

 

No weak signals so far after leaving the system off for a while. That's often when it would happen at start up.? A while back, I purchased a bunch of SO239's and PL259's off of Ebay.? Quite possibly Chinese made and there's a chance that center contact may not be what it should, so my experiment was to wrap some aluminum foil around 259's center and reinstall being careful not to compress the foil so it touched ground.? So far, so good.

On 7/8/21 8:05 AM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
Hi Bill,

The unun has SO239's on both ends that are connected by PL259's. The fit is very tight.? The ground is soldered to the casing. That being said, I am trying a little experiment and will report back results.

Jon


On 7/8/21 5:54 AM, Bill Cromwell wrote:
Hi,

You didn't mention the coax connectors. Is your coax soldered directly to the transformer wires? BNC? PL259? If there are plugs and sockets is the fit good? Especially the center conductor pins. Solid connection of the braid? You still are perfectly describing an intermittent connection.

73,

Bill? KU8H

bark less - wag more

On 7/8/21 1:57 AM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
Well, to my surprise, it's still doing it.? Disassembled the unun and found nothing disconnected or shorted.? I resoldered all the connections just in case, then reassembled.? Tonight, when I started the SDR, there was again no reception.? Reached out the window to barely wiggle the unun and everything comes back.? Not sure what to make of it as everything about the unun checks out ok.











Re: something odd

 

Hi Bill,

The unun has SO239's on both ends that are connected by PL259's. The fit is very tight.? The ground is soldered to the casing. That being said, I am trying a little experiment and will report back results.

Jon

On 7/8/21 5:54 AM, Bill Cromwell wrote:
Hi,

You didn't mention the coax connectors. Is your coax soldered directly to the transformer wires? BNC? PL259? If there are plugs and sockets is the fit good? Especially the center conductor pins. Solid connection of the braid? You still are perfectly describing an intermittent connection.

73,

Bill? KU8H

bark less - wag more

On 7/8/21 1:57 AM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
Well, to my surprise, it's still doing it.? Disassembled the unun and found nothing disconnected or shorted.? I resoldered all the connections just in case, then reassembled.? Tonight, when I started the SDR, there was again no reception.? Reached out the window to barely wiggle the unun and everything comes back.? Not sure what to make of it as everything about the unun checks out ok.







Re: something odd

 

Hi,

You didn't mention the coax connectors. Is your coax soldered directly to the transformer wires? BNC? PL259? If there are plugs and sockets is the fit good? Especially the center conductor pins. Solid connection of the braid? You still are perfectly describing an intermittent connection.

73,

Bill? KU8H

bark less - wag more

On 7/8/21 1:57 AM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
Well, to my surprise, it's still doing it. Disassembled the unun and found nothing disconnected or shorted. I resoldered all the connections just in case, then reassembled. Tonight, when I started the SDR, there was again no reception. Reached out the window to barely wiggle the unun and everything comes back. Not sure what to make of it as everything about the unun checks out ok.




Re: something odd

 

Well, to my surprise, it's still doing it. Disassembled the unun and found nothing disconnected or shorted. I resoldered all the connections just in case, then reassembled. Tonight, when I started the SDR, there was again no reception. Reached out the window to barely wiggle the unun and everything comes back. Not sure what to make of it as everything about the unun checks out ok.


Re: homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

 

Very sensitive, these capacitors, aren't they?? I, for one, never thought I'd encounter a bad ps cap as it had never been used and in my parts bin, but on the other hand it may have been bad from the start.

I'm not picking up images anymore, but new sources of interference.? I suspect it is from one or more of the neighbors as I seem to get it during daytime but not night.? Of course, only on longwave as it is more sensitive anyhow.

Jon

On 7/7/21 3:43 PM, Tony_AD0VC wrote:
It wasn't the ferrites. I rewound them all on T50-6 and T37-6 cores. Lots of turns for these and I still had the problem. The only thing left was the ceramic caps. The 2200pf caps were nice quality 5% npo caps that I bought for another project. The caps in the shunt branches were from a cheap capacitor kit with 30 of each value and 15 values. Replacing the cheapos fixed it. It is kind of surprising how bad the spurs were. I had heard of things like this but never actually experienced it.

Tony

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Tony_AD0VC <canthony15@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 9:35 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [softrock40] homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

I remember now. Ferrites are usually fine for transformers but not for inductors. I knew this and it just dropped off the radar. Sometimes I really hate getting old.

Anyway, I can fix this today. I have some 33uh and 22uh inductors that I can parallel for the 13uh and I have some T37-2 that I can wind for the smaller ones.

Tony

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Tony_AD0VC <canthony15@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 8:35 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [softrock40] homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

Just a heads up. I have been using the filter I built and I have a problem. I am seeing lots of IMD images of BC stations on the NDB band when my filter is installed. I tried installing an inline attenuator ahead of the filter because I thought maybe the low passband impedance was messing with the active loop amplifier but the images remained. Without the filter, no images so it is not coming from the loop amp. Finally, an alarm went off in my head as my poor memory dragged up an old recollection. I am pretty sure it is caused by the ferrites I chose for the filter. I have seen this before. I will have to try and locate some Txx cores in my junk box that will work in order to prove this.

As far as enclosures, I bought this pack of 3 from a**zon:

Amazon.com: 3 pcs 1590A Small Enclosure Box incl. Step Drill, PCB, Aluminum Guitar Effect Pedal Case, unpainted: Home Improvement<>

It includes a step drill which works fantastically well for the BNCs. But your filter is probably a bit too big for these boxes.

Tony

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of JonI via groups.io <ji425bt@...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 4:51 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [softrock40] homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

Here, it looks like your message came through twice, Gary, once last
night and then once today. Sometimes it takes a while to show after you
send it.

Unfortunately, don't own the Nano, but Tiny sure came in handy
yesterday, so much so that I ran down the battery and had to recharge
it. I'm not sure whether it takes on noise/ spurs/ harmonics if powered
via its port and didn't want to take any chances so let it charge for an
hour or so.

Well, about the only thing remaining with the filter is suitable
containment that's cheap! I found that I don't like the circuit board
containment I was originally going to use. I had soldered on three
sides and left one side open to make the filter, but found that I had
trouble getting the soldering iron into certain spots so decided to
remove the opposite side. It sure was a bear! A "bud" box is too
expensive for me for now. Any cheap alternative ideas welcome. With
the filter of course, I would like to have it shielded as well as
possible into the container.

Thanks,

Jon


On 7/6/21 5:50 AM, Gary wrote:
Let's try this again. I sent this message at 7 p.m. last night and it
hasn't shown up by 6 a.m. today. Did I commit some high crime and
misdemeanor?

Something that might be of interest is that the Surrey Amateur Radio
Club, VE7SAR, < <>ve7sar.net > has a wonderful newsletter that
comes out bi-monthly. The newsletter is usually around 110 pages.
The last several issues have had articles titled, Measurements with
the NanoVNA". The Nov - Dec 2020 article deals specifically with
"Establishing the Characteristics of Unknown Toroids".

73,
Gary - W6GVS
Dowagiac, MI

At 11:18 AM 7/5/2021, you wrote:
Thanks! Those are some good instructions, something I was looking
for yesterday on how to align the sections. Any advice to keep the
toroid turns in place once aligned? I find they can move quite a bit
during installation. Was thinking hot glue, but might hurt the enamel.

Jon


On 7/5/21 11:04 AM, Nick wrote:
On 05/07/2021 14:12, JonI via groups.io wrote:
I did check the inductance of the toroids before installation using
a separate capacitor, dip meter, and frequency counter.
Unfortunately, my dip meter doesn't go low enough to check the
resonances you indicate.
You should be able to do this with your noise source and TinySA.

Make up a test jig with a piece of scrap PCB and two BNC connectors.

Remove the resonators one by one from the filter and align as follows.

For the series resonators L1/C1 etc connect the two BNC centers and
strap the series resonator from there to ground.

Noise generator on one side, TinySA on the other. You should see a
sharp dip at the resonant frequency of 919kHz.? Squeeze or stretch
the toroid's turns to get that frequency, then reinstall the
resonator in the filter.

For the parallel resonators L2/C2 etc connect the resonator between
the two BNC centers. You should see a sharp dip at the resonant
frequency of 941kHz. Squeeze or stretch the toroid's turns to get
that frequency, then reinstall the resonator in the filter.

HTH

Nick





















Re: something odd

 

Yes, that is my suspicion.? I had a hard time soldering the toroid in the box I made as it was undersized.? Possible that I didn't solder one or more of the connections well.? I'll open it up in the next day or so to find out what is going on.? Thanks.

On 7/7/21 3:14 PM, Bill Cromwell wrote:
Hi,

You are perfectly describing and intermittent open. A poor connection, cracked connection, cold solder joint. It is located in the 'unun' device and could be a bad connector like the coax connector or the terminals where your antenna wire or ground connect. I have seen this many times in a variety of circuits.

73,

Bill KU8H

bark less - wag more

On 7/7/21 1:33 PM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
I'm finding sometimes that signals are about half of what they should be.? This happens when either Softrock is used and was going on before I starting using the filters.? As you know, I have coax feeding a 9:1 unun and the 100 foot wire attaches to that.? The unun and attachment points are right outside the window and I can easily reach outside to access the area from inside.? Now when I experience the signal loss, if I just wiggle the unun slightly or just barely move it, normal reception is returned. At first, I thought the wire 100 foot wire might be contacting ground and shorting out somewhere, but that is not the case.? Any ideas welcome.








Re: homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

 

It wasn't the ferrites. I rewound them all on T50-6 and T37-6 cores. Lots of turns for these and I still had the problem. The only thing left was the ceramic caps. The 2200pf caps were nice quality 5% npo caps that I bought for another project. The caps in the shunt branches were from a cheap capacitor kit with 30 of each value and 15 values. Replacing the cheapos fixed it. It is kind of surprising how bad the spurs were. I had heard of things like this but never actually experienced it.

Tony

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Tony_AD0VC <canthony15@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 9:35 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [softrock40] homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

I remember now. Ferrites are usually fine for transformers but not for inductors. I knew this and it just dropped off the radar. Sometimes I really hate getting old.

Anyway, I can fix this today. I have some 33uh and 22uh inductors that I can parallel for the 13uh and I have some T37-2 that I can wind for the smaller ones.

Tony

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Tony_AD0VC <canthony15@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 8:35 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [softrock40] homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

Just a heads up. I have been using the filter I built and I have a problem. I am seeing lots of IMD images of BC stations on the NDB band when my filter is installed. I tried installing an inline attenuator ahead of the filter because I thought maybe the low passband impedance was messing with the active loop amplifier but the images remained. Without the filter, no images so it is not coming from the loop amp. Finally, an alarm went off in my head as my poor memory dragged up an old recollection. I am pretty sure it is caused by the ferrites I chose for the filter. I have seen this before. I will have to try and locate some Txx cores in my junk box that will work in order to prove this.

As far as enclosures, I bought this pack of 3 from a**zon:

Amazon.com: 3 pcs 1590A Small Enclosure Box incl. Step Drill, PCB, Aluminum Guitar Effect Pedal Case, unpainted: Home Improvement<>

It includes a step drill which works fantastically well for the BNCs. But your filter is probably a bit too big for these boxes.

Tony

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of JonI via groups.io <ji425bt@...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 4:51 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [softrock40] homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

Here, it looks like your message came through twice, Gary, once last
night and then once today. Sometimes it takes a while to show after you
send it.

Unfortunately, don't own the Nano, but Tiny sure came in handy
yesterday, so much so that I ran down the battery and had to recharge
it. I'm not sure whether it takes on noise/ spurs/ harmonics if powered
via its port and didn't want to take any chances so let it charge for an
hour or so.

Well, about the only thing remaining with the filter is suitable
containment that's cheap! I found that I don't like the circuit board
containment I was originally going to use. I had soldered on three
sides and left one side open to make the filter, but found that I had
trouble getting the soldering iron into certain spots so decided to
remove the opposite side. It sure was a bear! A "bud" box is too
expensive for me for now. Any cheap alternative ideas welcome. With
the filter of course, I would like to have it shielded as well as
possible into the container.

Thanks,

Jon


On 7/6/21 5:50 AM, Gary wrote:
Let's try this again. I sent this message at 7 p.m. last night and it
hasn't shown up by 6 a.m. today. Did I commit some high crime and
misdemeanor?

Something that might be of interest is that the Surrey Amateur Radio
Club, VE7SAR, < <>ve7sar.net > has a wonderful newsletter that
comes out bi-monthly. The newsletter is usually around 110 pages.
The last several issues have had articles titled, Measurements with
the NanoVNA". The Nov - Dec 2020 article deals specifically with
"Establishing the Characteristics of Unknown Toroids".

73,
Gary - W6GVS
Dowagiac, MI

At 11:18 AM 7/5/2021, you wrote:
Thanks! Those are some good instructions, something I was looking
for yesterday on how to align the sections. Any advice to keep the
toroid turns in place once aligned? I find they can move quite a bit
during installation. Was thinking hot glue, but might hurt the enamel.

Jon


On 7/5/21 11:04 AM, Nick wrote:
On 05/07/2021 14:12, JonI via groups.io wrote:
I did check the inductance of the toroids before installation using
a separate capacitor, dip meter, and frequency counter.
Unfortunately, my dip meter doesn't go low enough to check the
resonances you indicate.
You should be able to do this with your noise source and TinySA.

Make up a test jig with a piece of scrap PCB and two BNC connectors.

Remove the resonators one by one from the filter and align as follows.

For the series resonators L1/C1 etc connect the two BNC centers and
strap the series resonator from there to ground.

Noise generator on one side, TinySA on the other. You should see a
sharp dip at the resonant frequency of 919kHz.? Squeeze or stretch
the toroid's turns to get that frequency, then reinstall the
resonator in the filter.

For the parallel resonators L2/C2 etc connect the resonator between
the two BNC centers. You should see a sharp dip at the resonant
frequency of 941kHz. Squeeze or stretch the toroid's turns to get
that frequency, then reinstall the resonator in the filter.

HTH

Nick





Re: something odd

 

Hi,

You are perfectly describing and intermittent open. A poor connection, cracked connection, cold solder joint. It is located in the 'unun' device and could be a bad connector like the coax connector or the terminals where your antenna wire or ground connect. I have seen this many times in a variety of circuits.

73,

Bill KU8H

bark less - wag more

On 7/7/21 1:33 PM, JonI via groups.io wrote:
I'm finding sometimes that signals are about half of what they should be.? This happens when either Softrock is used and was going on before I starting using the filters.? As you know, I have coax feeding a 9:1 unun and the 100 foot wire attaches to that.? The unun and attachment points are right outside the window and I can easily reach outside to access the area from inside.? Now when I experience the signal loss, if I just wiggle the unun slightly or just barely move it, normal reception is returned. At first, I thought the wire 100 foot wire might be contacting ground and shorting out somewhere, but that is not the case.? Any ideas welcome.





Re: something odd

 

No, I used some spare 24 gauge hookup wire.

Jon

On 7/7/21 1:45 PM, Tony_AD0VC wrote:
if it is enameled wire wrapped through a ferrite core, you should use a layer of tape to insulate the core before winding because ferrites are somewhat conductive and enamel can be scraped off. When it shorts to the core it can affect the signal. Just a possibility.

Tony

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of JonI via groups.io <ji425bt@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 11:33 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [softrock40] something odd

I'm finding sometimes that signals are about half of what they should
be. This happens when either Softrock is used and was going on before I
starting using the filters. As you know, I have coax feeding a 9:1 unun
and the 100 foot wire attaches to that. The unun and attachment points
are right outside the window and I can easily reach outside to access
the area from inside. Now when I experience the signal loss, if I just
wiggle the unun slightly or just barely move it, normal reception is
returned. At first, I thought the wire 100 foot wire might be contacting
ground and shorting out somewhere, but that is not the case. Any ideas
welcome.










Re: something odd

 

if it is enameled wire wrapped through a ferrite core, you should use a layer of tape to insulate the core before winding because ferrites are somewhat conductive and enamel can be scraped off. When it shorts to the core it can affect the signal. Just a possibility.

Tony

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of JonI via groups.io <ji425bt@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 11:33 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [softrock40] something odd

I'm finding sometimes that signals are about half of what they should
be. This happens when either Softrock is used and was going on before I
starting using the filters. As you know, I have coax feeding a 9:1 unun
and the 100 foot wire attaches to that. The unun and attachment points
are right outside the window and I can easily reach outside to access
the area from inside. Now when I experience the signal loss, if I just
wiggle the unun slightly or just barely move it, normal reception is
returned. At first, I thought the wire 100 foot wire might be contacting
ground and shorting out somewhere, but that is not the case. Any ideas
welcome.


something odd

 

I'm finding sometimes that signals are about half of what they should be.? This happens when either Softrock is used and was going on before I starting using the filters.? As you know, I have coax feeding a 9:1 unun and the 100 foot wire attaches to that.? The unun and attachment points are right outside the window and I can easily reach outside to access the area from inside.? Now when I experience the signal loss, if I just wiggle the unun slightly or just barely move it, normal reception is returned. At first, I thought the wire 100 foot wire might be contacting ground and shorting out somewhere, but that is not the case.? Any ideas welcome.


Re: homemade chebyshev 7th order BB band stop to begin soon

 

I didn't want to start a thread on this, so thought I'd tag it on here.? I don't know much about NooElec, where I ordered my BC stop filter from on the 4th, but I do know that they won't cancel orders and seem to completely ignore cancellation requests until after they've shipped.

Once I got the filter working, I cancelled orders from them for the filter and another source for the NPO ceramics I was going to use.? The other source cancelled immediately.

Perhaps your experience with NooElec was good, and they may in fact be a good firm to deal with, but don't try and cancel your order.

Jon